Abstract
This chapter summarizes the common method and indicators used throughout this book to assess the sustainability performance of Food Quality Schemes (FQS) and their reference products. It contains the list of 23 indicators used to assess sustainability in food and agri-food value chains. This list was drawn up on the basis of a literature review and the FAO’s Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems (SAFA) indicators (FAO 2013). The chapter presents the assumptions and choices, the process of data collection and the indicator estimation methods designed to assess the three sustainability dimensions within a reasonable time constraint, i.e. three person.months for each food quality scheme and its non-certified reference product. Several prioritizations were set regarding data collection (indicator, variable, value chain level) together with a level of representativeness specific to each variable and product type (country and sector). This chapter also summarizes how relatively common variables (e.g., number of animals per hectare, …) collected for each case study are combined into indicators (e.g., carbon footprint), thus providing the key for their interpretation in subsequent chapters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For example, if 25% of the total volume is sold in national supermarkets at price a, 50% by direct selling at price b and 25% is exported at price c, the average price will be (0.25∗a + 0.5∗b + 0.25∗c). The same logic applies for different presentation and type of products (raw or processed product, packaging, more or less aged, etc.).
- 2.
Adapted for seafood: either irrelevant (for wild fish) or UAA replaced by area of fish/seafood farms.
- 3.
Based on expert practice of carbon footprint calculation, some farm-level variables are nevertheless classified as secondary when they tend to represent a negligible fraction of the total footprint.
References
Acosta-Alba, I., & Van der Werf, H. (2011). The use of reference values in indicator-based methods for the environmental assessment of agricultural systems. Sustainability, 3, 424–442. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3020424.
Argyres, N. S., & Liebeskind, J. P. (1999). Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1580440.
Bellassen, V., Giraud, G., Hilal, M., Arfini, F., Barczak, A., Bodini, A., Brennan, M., Drut, M., Duboys de Labarre, M., Gorton, M., Hartmann, M., Majewski, E., Muller, P., Monier-Dilhan, S., Poméon, T., Tocco, B., Tregear, A., Veneziani, M., Vergote, M.-H., Vitterso, G., Wavresky, P., Wilkinson, A. (2016). Methods and indicators for measuring the social, environmental and economic impacts of food quality schemes, Strength2Food project, deliverable 3.2. INRA, Dijon, France. www.strength2food.eu/2016/10/03/methodological-handbook/
Bockstaller, C., Feschet, P., & Angevin, F. (2015). Issues in evaluating sustainability of farming systems with indicators. Oilseeds and Fats, Crops and Lipids, 22, D102. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2014052.
Chatellier, V. (2002). Les exploitations laitières françaises sont-elles assez performantes pour faire face à une baisse du prix du lait ? INRA Productions Animales, 15, 17–30.
Chatellier, V., & Delattre, F. (2003). La production laitière dans les montagnes françaises: une dynamique particulière pour les Alpes du Nord. INRA Productions Animales, 16, 61–76.
Coff, R. W. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.2.119.
Coff, R. W. (2010). The coevolution of rent appropriation and capability development. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 711–733.
Colomb, V., Bernoux, M., Bockel, L., Chotte, J.L., Martin, S., Martin-Phipps, C., Mousset, J., Tinlot, M., Touchemoulin, O. (2012). Review of GHG calculators in agriculture and forestry. (ADEME, IRD, and FAO).
Eco-Invent database. (2012). www.ecoinvent.ch
FAO (2010). ‘CROPWAT 8.0 model’ www.fao.org/nr/water/infores_databases_cropwat.html.
FAO. (2013). SAFA indicators. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
Filippi, M., & Muller, P. (2013). Le jeu des Communautés de Pratique au sein des Coopératives agricoles : le cas des filières fromagères vache d’appellation d’origine du Massif Central. In A. Torre & F. Wallet (Eds.), Les Enjeux Du Développement Régional et Territorial En Zones Rurales (pp. 27–58). Paris: L’Harmattan.
FranceAgriMer, Observatoire de la formation des prix et des marges des produits alimentaires. (2011). “Chapitre 2. Les matériaux et les méthodes de l’observatoire de la formation des prix et des marges des produits alimentaires”. https://observatoire-prixmarges.franceagrimer.fr/ (sources et méthodes, Méthodes toutes filières, Chapitre II du rapport de juin 2011).
Gan, X., Fernandez, I. C., Guo, J., Wilson, M., Zhao, Y., Zhou, B., & Wu, J. (2017). When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators. Ecological Indicators, 81, 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068.
Halpern, D. (1999). Social capital: The new golden goose. Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Cambridge University. Unpublished review.
Hillier, J., Walter, C., Malin, D., Garcia-Suarez, T., Mila-i-Canals, L., & Smith, P. (2011). A farm-focused calculator for emissions from crop and live-stock production. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, 1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.014.
Hillygus, D. S. (2005). The missing link: Exploring the relationship between higher education and political behavior. Political Behavior, 27(1), 25–47.
JRC. (2010). International reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook – general guide for life cycle assessment – detailed guidance. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Luxembourg. Publications Office of the European Union.
Just, R. E., & Pope, R. D. (2001). The agricultural producer: Theory and statistical measurement. Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 1, 629–741.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone – The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rigby, D., Woodhouse, P., Young, T., & Burton, M. (2001). Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice. Ecological Economics, 39, 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00245-2.
Röös, E., Sundberg, C., & Hansson, P.-A. (2014). Carbon footprint of food products. In S. S. Muthu (Ed.), Assessment of carbon footprint in different industrial sectors. Singapore.
Schoon, I., et al. (2010). Social status, cognitive ability, and educational attainment as predictors of liberal social attitudes and political trust. Intelligence, 38, 144–150.
Touboulic, A., Chicksand, D., & Walker, H. (2014). Managing imbalanced supply chain relationships for sustainability: A power perspective. Decision Sciences, 45, 577–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12087.
UNDP. (2018). Human development indices and indicators 2018 statistical update technical notes. [online]. Available at http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2018_technical_notes.pdf. Last accessed on 4 Dec 2018.
Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. (2008). Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 3508–3513. https://doi.org/10.1021/es702969f.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bellassen, V. et al. (2019). Common Methods and Sustainability Indicators. In: Arfini, F., Bellassen, V. (eds) Sustainability of European Food Quality Schemes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27508-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27508-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27507-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27508-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)