Advertisement

Conclusions and Implications

  • Heather NancarrowEmail author
Chapter
  • 305 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology book series (PSVV)

Abstract

This Chapter discusses three major conclusions from the research, their implications, and potential strategies for action. It summarises the overarching concern of the book: the current formulaic legal response to domestic and family violence replaces individual male power with state (White, male) power, over women. This is especially detrimental to Indigenous women and more so for those in remote communities. A paradigm shift in the current response to domestic and family violence to accommodate an intersectional analysis is called for. However, retaining the gains of the feminist movement towards achieving unequivocal state sanctions against patriarchal coercive control may be compromised, and remains a key challenge to reform.

Keywords

Domestic violence law Alternative justice Perpetrator programs Behaviour change programs Indigenous Cultural authority Liminal space Aboriginal domain Structural reform Gender inequality Racial inequality State sanctions 

References

  1. Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). (2010). Social justice report 2009: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner. Sydney, NSW: AHRC.Google Scholar
  2. Bartels, L. (2010). Emerging issues in domestic/family violence research (Research in Practice No. 10). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  3. Behrendt, L. (2003). Achieving social justice: Indigenous rights and Australia's future. Sydney: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blagg, H. (2008). Crime, aboriginality and the decolonisation of justice. Sydney: Hawkins Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blagg, H., Bluett-Boyd, N., & Williams, E. (2015). Innovative models in addressing violence against Indigenous women: State of knowledge paper (ANROWS Landscapes, 08/2015). Sydney: ANROWS.Google Scholar
  6. Blagg, H., Williams, E., Cummings, E., Hovane, V., Torres, M., & Woodley, K. N. (2018). Innovative models in addressing violence against Indigenous women: Final report (ANROWS Horizons, 01/2018). Sydney: ANROWS.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, D., Cunneen, C., Schwartz, M., Stubbs, J., & Young, C. (2016). Justice reinvestment: Winding back imprisonment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Centre for Innovative Justice. (2015). Opportunities for early intervention: Bringing perpetrators of family violence into view. Melbourne: RMIT University.Google Scholar
  9. Clear, T., Marchetti, E., & McNamara, L. (2016). Justice reinvestment: Winding back imprisonment [Book review by D. Brown, C. Cunneen, M. Schwartz, J. Stubbs, & C. Young]. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 28(1).Google Scholar
  10. Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2011). The National Plan to reduce violence against women and their children 2010–2022. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Coker, D. (2002). Transformative justice: Anti-subordination practices in cases of domestic violence. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cussen, T., & Bryant, W. (2015). Domestic/family homicide in Australia. In Research in Practice: No. 38 May 2015. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, K. (2002). Sexual assault and restorative justice. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Daly, K. (2008). Seeking justice in the 21st century: Towards an intersectional politics of justice. In H. V. Miller (Ed.), Restorative justice: From theory to practice (sociology of crime, law and deviance) (Vol. 11, pp. 3–30). San Antonio, TX: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daly, K. (2016). What is restorative justice? Fresh answers to a vexed question. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 9–29.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1107797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daly, K., & Stubbs, J. (2006). Feminist engagement with restorative justice. Theoretical Criminology, 10(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, M. (2009). A woman’s place …. Griffith Review, Edition 24: Participation Society, 156–161.Google Scholar
  18. Douglas, H., & Fitzgerald, R. (2018). The domestic violence protection order system as entry to the criminal justice system for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 7(3), 41–57.Google Scholar
  19. Fagan, J. (1996). The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. Paper presented at the Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Farmer, E., & Callan, S. (2012). Beyond violence: Breaking cycles of domestic violence: A policy report for the Centre for Social Justice. London: Centre for Social Justice.Google Scholar
  21. Flood, M. (2003). Deconstructing the culture of sexual assault: Violence prevention education among men. Conference paper presented at Practice and Prevention: Contemporary Issues in Adult Sexual Assault in New South Wales, University of Technology, Sydney. Retrieved January 10, 2014, from http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/39933/20040202-0000/www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/cpd.nsf/files/flood.pdf/$FILE/flood.pdf.
  22. Goodmark, L. (2012). A troubled marriage: Domestic violence and the legal system. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Goodmark, L. (2018). Decriminalizing domestic violence: A balanced policy approach to intimate partner violence. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hudson, B. (1998). Restorative justice: The challenge of sexual and racial violence. Journal of Law and Society, 25(2), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hudson, B. (2002). Restorative justice and gendered violence: Diversion or effective justice? British Journal of Criminology, 42(1), 616–634.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.3.616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelly, L. (2002) Using restorative justice principles to address family violence in Aboriginal communities. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence (pp. 206–222). Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. KPMG. (2018). Maranguka justice reinvestment project impact assessment. Sydney: Maranguka and Just Reinvest NSW.Google Scholar
  28. Mackay, E., Gibson, A., Lam, H., & Beecham, D. (2015). Perpetrator interventions in Australia: Part oneLiterature review. State of knowledge paper (ANROWS Horizons 01/2015). Sydney: ANROWS.Google Scholar
  29. Marchetti, E. (2010). Indigenous sentencing courts and partner violence: Perspectives of court practitioners and Elders on gender power imbalances during the sentencing hearing. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(2), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marchetti, E. (2015). An Australian Indigenous-focused justice response to intimate partner violence: Offenders perceptions of the sentencing process. British Journal of Criminology, 55(1), 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marchetti, E. (2019). Indigenous courts, cultures and partner violence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marchetti, E., & Daly, K. (2017). Indigenous partner violence, Indigenous sentencing courts, and pathways to desistance. Violence Against Women, 23(12) 1513–1535.Google Scholar
  33. McGillivray, A., & Comaskey, B. (1999). Black eyes all of the time: Intimate violence, Aboriginal women and the justice system. London: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mosby, E., & Thomsen, G. (2014). Gatharr Weyebe Banabe program: Seeking behaviour change in Indigenous family violence. The No To Violence Journal, (Spring), 7–28.Google Scholar
  35. Nancarrow, H. (2006). In search of justice for domestic and family violence: Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian women’s perspectives. Theoretical Criminology, 10(1), 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nancarrow, H. (2010). Restorative justice for domestic and family violence: Hopes and fears of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian women. In J. Ptacek (Ed.), Restorative justice and violence against women (pp. 123–149). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nancarrow, H. (2016). Legal responses to intimate partner violence: Gendered aspirations and racialised realities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Griffith University, Australia.Google Scholar
  38. National Congress of Australia’s First Peoples. (2016). The Redfern statement. Retrieved from http://nationalcongress.com.au/the-redfern-statement/ on 16 June 2016.
  39. No To Violence & Red Tree Consulting. (2012). Towards safe families: A practice guide for men’s domestic violence behaviour change programs. Sydney: NSW Department of Attorney General and Justice.Google Scholar
  40. Our Watch. (2018). Changing the picture: A national resource to support the prevention of violence against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their children. Melbourne: Our Watch.Google Scholar
  41. Our Watch, ANROWS, & VicHealth. (2015). Change the story: A shared framework for the primary prevention of violence against women and their children in Australia. Melbourne: Our Watch.Google Scholar
  42. Respect. (2015). Respect briefing paper: Evidence base for interventions with domestic violence perpetrators. London: Respect.Google Scholar
  43. Robertson, B. (2000). The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women’s task force on violence report. Brisbane: Queensland Government.Google Scholar
  44. Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  45. Schwartz, M., Brown, D. B., & Boseley, L. (2012, June 6). The promise of justice reinvestment. Retrieved May 16, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2078715.
  46. Sherman, L. W. (1995). Domestic violence and defiance theory. In D. Chappel & S. Egger (Eds.), Australian violence: Contemporary perspectives II (pp. 207–220). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  47. Stark, E. (2006). Commentary on Johnson’s “conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence”. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1019–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Stubbs, J. (1994). Women, male violence and the law. Sydney: The Institute of Criminology, Sydney University Law School.Google Scholar
  50. Stubbs, J. (2002). Domestic violence and women’s safety: Feminist challenges to restorative justice. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. SuccessWorks. (2009). Review of the integrated response to family violence: Final report. Hobart: Department of Justice, Tasmanian Government.Google Scholar
  52. Wangmann, J. (2009). ‘She said…’ ‘he said…’: Cross applications in NSW apprehended domestic violence order proceedings (Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Faculty of Law), University of Sydney, NSW.Google Scholar
  53. Watson, I. (1997). ‘Indigenous peoples’ law-ways: Survival against the colonial state. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 39, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ANROWSSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations