Advertisement

Gendered Aspirations in Domestic Violence Law

  • Heather NancarrowEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology book series (PSVV)

Abstract

Drawing on key policy documents and parliamentary debates on legislative Bills, Chapter  3 demonstrates the intention of advocates and legislators to address a particular kind of violence (coercive control), perpetrated by men against women. This is the first time the specific intent of domestic violence legislation has been explicitly established, rather than assumed or implied. The advocacy, policy and legislation in Queensland, Australia, is used as a case study to do so. The analysis shows that a continued focus on the type of relationships to be covered in law, rather than the type of violence, entrenched the problem: laws designed to protect women being used against them. Further, it reveals an unlikely alliance between feminists and conservative governments in strengthening state power over women.

Keywords

Violence against women Feminist law reform Intimate partner violence Criminal law Civil law Coercive control Definitions Police Police power 

References

  1. ALRC & NSWLRC. (2010). Family violence—A national legal response. Sydney: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  2. Araji, S. (2000). Crimes of honor and shame: Violence against women in non-western and western societies. The Red Feather Journal of Postmodern Criminology. Retrieved from http://www.critcrim.org/redfeather/journal-pomocrim/vol-8-shaming/araji.html on May 18, 2013.
  3. Back, A. (2019). Warning about new trend in domestic violence. The Canberra Times. Retrieved from https://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/act/warning-about-new-trend-in-domestic-violence-20190111-p50qua.html.
  4. Beanland, D. (1999, November 11). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  5. Bligh, A. (1999a, June 8). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  6. Bligh, A. (1999b, November 12). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  7. Coker, D. (2001). Crime control and feminist law reform in domestic violence law: A critical review. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4(2), 801–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Copeland, S. (2002, March 7). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  9. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalising the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.Google Scholar
  10. Currie, S. (1996). A report on legislative options for non-spousal domestic violence. Brisbane: Queensland Government.Google Scholar
  11. Elliott, L. (1986). Break the silence: Report of the Taskforce on Domestic Violence to the Western Australian Government. Perth, WA: Western Australian Government.Google Scholar
  12. Fagan, J. (1996). The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. Paper presented at the Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Fitzgerald, G. E. T. (1989). Commission of inquiry into possible illegal activities and associated police misconduct. Brisbane: Queensland Government. Retrieved from http://www.QCMC.qld.gov.au/research-and-publications/publications/police/the-fitzgerald-inquiry-report-1987201389 on February 21, 2012.
  14. Flood, M. (2003). Deconstructing the culture of sexual assault: Violence prevention education among men. Conference paper presented at Practice and prevention: Contemporary issues in adult sexual assault in New South Wales, University of Technology Sydney.Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, H. (1989, April 11). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  16. Gamin, J. (1989, April 11). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  17. Goodmark, L. (2012). A troubled marriage: Domestic violence and the legal system. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Harris, A. P. (1990). Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. Stanford Law Review, 42, 581–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirschel, D., & Buzawa, E. (2002). Understanding the context of dual arrest with directions for future research. Violence Against Women, 8(12), 1449–1473.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107780102237965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hopcroft, R. (1983). Report of the Tasmanian review on domestic violence. Hobart, TAS: Department of Community Welfare, Tasmania.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  22. Kvinnoforum/Foundation of Women’s Forum. (2005). Honour related violence: European resource book for good practice: Based on the European project “Prevention of violence against women and girls in patriarchal families”. Stockholm: Kvinnoforum/Foundation for Women’s Forum.Google Scholar
  23. Nancarrow, H. (2012, November 7–9). Quasi criminal domestic violence laws: Australia’s primary response to intimate partner violence and its unintended consequences. Paper presented at Sexual violence, domestic violence: Exploring the continuum of violence against women and girls, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  24. New South Wales Task Force on Domestic Violence (NSWTFDV). (1981). Report of the New South Wales Task Force on Domestic Violence. Sydney: NSW Women’s Coordination Unit, Department of Premier and Cabinet.Google Scholar
  25. Queensland Domestic Violence Services Network (QDVSN). (2014). Submission to the Premier’s Special Taskforce on Domestic and Family Violence. Brisbane, QLD: Queensland Government.Google Scholar
  26. Queensland Domestic Violence Task Force (QDVTF). (1988). Beyond these walls. Brisbane: Queensland Government.Google Scholar
  27. Rathus, Z. (2013). Shifting language and meaning between social science and the law. UNSW Law Journal, 36(2), 359–389.Google Scholar
  28. Sherman, L. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sherman, L. W. (1995). Domestic violence and defiance theory. In D. Chappel & S. Egger (Eds.), Australian violence: Contemporary perspectives II (pp. 207–220). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  30. Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984a). Police Foundation Reports: The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment. Washington, DC: Police Foundation. Retreived from http://www.policefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Sherman-et-al.-1984-The-Minneapolis-Domestic-Violence-Experiment.pdf on 10 May 2012.
  31. Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984b). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261–272.Google Scholar
  32. Sherman, L. W., Smith, D. A., Schmidt, J. D., & Rogan, D. P. (1992). Crime, punishment and a stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sherrin, C. A. (1989, March 15). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  34. Simpson, F. (2002, March 8). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  35. Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the power of law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, A. (2001). Domestic violence laws: The voices of battered women. Violence and Victims, 16(1), 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spence, J. (2001, November 1). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  38. Spence, J. (2002, March 8). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  39. Stark, E. (2006). Commentary on Johnson’s “conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence”. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1019–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
  42. Wangmann, J. (2010). Gender and intimate partner violence: A case study from New South Wales. UNSW Law Journal, 33(3), 945–969.Google Scholar
  43. Warner, A. (1989, April 11). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  44. Warner, A. (1992, June 18). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  45. White, T. (1989, April 11). Queensland parliamentary debates (Hansard). Brisbane.Google Scholar
  46. Women’s Policy Co-ordination Unit. (1985). Criminal assault in the home: Social and legal responses to domestic violence. Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Government.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ANROWSSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations