Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Comparative Studies of Political Agendas ((CSPA))

  • 287 Accesses

Abstract

The policy agenda represents the set of problems facing the society and is a product of strategic choices and preferences of a variety of political actors including elected politicians, political parties, the public, and the media. Societal problems are often complex and require immediate attention. However, human beings and the institutions they inhabit have limited attention spans, as a result of which many of the important policy problems facing the society fail to get onto the political agenda, even if they succeed, they seldom receive enough attention to trigger policy change. In this book, we attempt to explore the dynamics of the policymaking process in a system with an additional layer of complication, political instability that arose from weak political institutionalization, ideological fragmentation, and the failure to solidify democratic gains. This chapter introduces our motivation to undertake this study and our contribution to the study of comparative public policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baumgartner, F.R., M. Carammia, D.A. Epp, B. Noble, B. Rey, and T.M. Yildirim. 2017. Budgetary Change in Authoritarian and Democratic Regimes. Journal of European Public Policy 24 (6): 792–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward G., and James Stimson. 1993. On the Evolution of Political Issues. In Agenda Formation, ed. W. Riker, 151–168. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Daniel J. 2009. Clientelism Versus Ideology Problems of Party Development in Brazil. Party Politics 15: 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froio, Caterina, Shaun Bevan, and Will Jennings. 2017. Party Mandates and the Politics of Attention Party Platforms, Public Priorities and the Policy Agenda in Britain. Party Politics 23 (6): 692–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D.C., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, Will, Shaun Bevan, and Peter John. 2011. The Agenda of British Government: The Speech from the Throne, 1911–2008. Political Studies 59: 74–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Bryan D., and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert. 2013. Democratic Accountability and Linkages Project. Durham, NC: Duke University. https://sites.duke.edu/democracylinkage/data/.

  • Kitschelt, Herbert, Kirk Hawkins, Juan Pablo Luna, Guillermo Rosas, and Elizabeth Zechmeister. 2010. Latin American Party Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambur, Bilal. 2009. The Great Transformation of Political Islam in Turkey: The Case of Justice and Development Party and Erdogan. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies 2 (2): 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vliegenthart, R., S. Walgrave, F.R. Baumgartner, S. Bevan, C. Breunig, S. Brouard, L.C. Bonafont, E. Grossman, W. Jennings, P.B. Mortensen, and A.M. Palau. 2016. Do the Media Set the Parliamentary Agenda? A Comparative Study in Seven Countries. European Journal of Political Research 55 (2): 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, M., B.D. Jones, and F.R. Baumgartner. 2013. A Failure to Communicate: Agenda Setting in Media and Policy Studies. Political Communication 30 (2): 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alper T. Bulut .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bulut, A.T., Yildirim, T.M. (2020). Introduction. In: Political Stability, Democracy and Agenda Dynamics in Turkey. Comparative Studies of Political Agendas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27458-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics