Abstract
California’s Graduated Driver Licensing program helps combat the disproportionately high rate of motor vehicle collisions and resulting traumatic brain injuries involving young drivers, particularly those under the age of 18. By allowing new drivers the opportunity to gain experience through exposure of conditions that gradually increase in risk, drivers are able to understand and curb some risks. Certain conditions include having a nighttime driving component, highway driving age restrictions, and supervisions while driving. Under graduated licensing, young drivers are initially granted partial driving privileges so that they may gain the necessary driving experience under conditions of reduced risk. As they gain experience and mature, they are awarded broader privileges until they finally receive a full license.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Automobile Association. (2004). Teen drivers: A guide to graduated driver license.: Retrieved August 12, 2004, from http://www.csaa.com/global/articledetail/0,1398,1004040000%257C1274,00.html
Boase, P., & Tasca, L. (1998). Graduated licensing system evaluation: Interim report. Toronto, ON: Safety Policy Branch, Ontario Ministry of Transportation.
California State Senate. (1997). Legislative Council Digest: Senate Bill 1329 Introduction.: Retrieved August 1, 2004, from http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=sb_1329&sess=9798&house=B&site=sen
Canadian Paraplegic Association. (2000). Spinal cord injury in Canada. Ottawa. Retrieved August 1, 2004, from www.canparaplegic.org
Chen, L. H., Baker, S. P., Braver, E. R., & Li, G. (2000). Carrying passengers as a risk factor for crashes fatal to 16- and 17-Year-old drivers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1578–1582.
Department of Motor Vehicles. (2004). Driver License and Identification Card Information: How to apply for a provisional permit if you are under 18. Retrieved August 13, 2004, from http://www.dmv.ca.gov/dl/dl_info.htm#PERMINOR
Haddon, W. Jr. (1980). Advances in the epidemiology of injuries as a basis for public policy. Public Health Reports, 95(5), 411–421.
Hagge, R. A., & Marsh, W. C. (1988). The traffic safety impact of provisional licensing (Report No. 116). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2001). Status Report, 36(6), 4–5.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety & National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2004). Questions & answers: Teenagers: Graduated driver licensing. Online report. Retrieved July 21, 2004, from http://www.iihs.org/safety_facts/qanda/images/grad_lic.pdf
Lin, M. L., & Fearn, K. T. (2003). The provisional license: Nighttime and passenger restrictions. Journal of Safety Research, 34(1), 49–51.
Masten, S. V., & Hagge, R. A. (2003). Evaluation of California’s graduated driver licensing program. California Department of Motor Vehicles, Report RSS 03-205.
Mayhew, D. R., Simpson, H. M., & Pak, A. (2003). Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. Accident Analysis Prevention, 35(5), 683–691.
National Conference of State Legislatures. (2000). NCSL transportation review: Graduated Licensing for Teen Drivers. Retrieved July 21, 2004, from http://www.ncsl.org/programs/transportation/trgradli.htm
Ontario Ministry of Transportation. (2002). Ontario road safety annual report 2002: Building safe communities. Safety Education Policy Branch. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/safety/orsar/orsar02/summary.htm
Rice, T. M., Peek-Asa, C., & Kraus, J. F. (2004). Effects of the California graduated driver licensing program. Journal of Safety Research, 35(4), 375–381.
Simpson, H. M. (2003). Evolution and effectiveness of graduated licensing. Journal of Safety Research, 34, 25–34.
SMARTRISK Foundation. (1998). The economic burden of unintentional injury in Canada. Toronto, ON: SMARTRISK Foundation.
Takhar, H. (2004). Introduction of an act to enhance the safety of children and youth on Ontario’s roads. Statement by the Ontario Minister of Transportation, Queen’s Park, Toronto. Retrieved June 20, 2004, from http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/news/statements/stat040504.htm
Trauma Foundation. (2004). Making change happen: Over 25 years of injury prevention. Retrieved August 13, 2004, from http://www.tf.org/tf/images/TFOverview.pdf
Volpe, R. (2004). The conceptualization of injury prevention as change in complex systems. Life Span Adaptation Projects. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Williams, A. F. (2001). Barriers and opportunities in reducing motor vehicle injuries. Injury Prevention, 7, 83–84.
Williams, A. F. (2003). Teenage drivers: Patterns of risk. Journal of Safety Research, 34, 5–15.
Williams, A. F., & Mayhew, D. R. (2004). Graduated licensing: A blueprint for North America. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Retrieved July 1, 2003, from http://www.highwaysafety.org/safety_facts/teens/blueprint.pdf
Williams, A. F., Nelson, L. A., & Leaf, W. A. (2002). Responses of teenagers and their parents to California’s graduated licensing system. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34(6), 835–842.
Yaksich Jr., S. (1982). Teenagers under attack. Journal of Traffic Safety Education, 29, 7–11.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to express sincere appreciation to the key informants for this case study: Anne Drumm of the American Automobile Association in Sacramento, CA, USA and Juanita Curranco of the California Department of Motor Vehicles in Sacramento, CA, USA—whose consultation made this project possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
BRIO Model: Graduated Driver Licensing Program, California
Group Served: Young novice drivers .
Goal: To help combat the high rate of collisions involving young novice drivers.
Background | Resources | Implementation | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
California was one of the first jurisdictions to implement a few basic elements of a preliminary GDL model (provisional licensing) in 1983, which was shown to be effective in reducing MVCs among young drivers July 1998 a more comprehensive and rigorous GDL law was implemented, entitled “Brady/Jared Teen Driver Safety Act of 1997” after two teens who were killed in MVCs in California | Primary collaborators before the law was passed were the Automobile Club of Southern California (ACSC) and the California State Automobile Association After the law came into effect, the California Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) was responsible for a portion, with an entire coalition of stakeholders and supporters consisting over 50 different traffic safety groups, parent and teacher associations, injury prevention groups, law enforcement officials, and medical professionals Costs were minimal as the DMV did not have to change many of the basic procedures of obtaining the license | The model consists of 3 stages: learner’s permit, provisional/intermediate license, full license After the law came into effect, supporters set out to educate the public through press releases, high school visits, and parent–teacher associations Greatest challenge was the implementation of the nighttime driving restriction, which was successfully compromised on after much debate DMV responsible for licensing young drivers as well as inspecting and regulating state driving schools and setting criteria, as well as implementing and communicating any changes in law Evaluations continue to occur | Separate traffic safety research groups examined the impact of California’s GDL system Results from the studies generally indicate that parents strongly approved Significant reductions in injuries and fatalities specific to the introduced nighttime driving and passenger restrictions were witnessed |
Life Space Model : Graduated Driver Licensing Program, California
Sociocultural: civilization/community | Interpersonal: primary and secondary relationships | Physical environments: where we live | Internal states: biochemical/genetic and means of coping |
---|---|---|---|
Overall support and compliance for CA’s GDL by parents and teens, safety groups, politicians, and others within the CA communities Parents and police will be the primary enforcers of this legislation in order to ensure teenagers are following the restrictions | Young drivers will have to learn to say no to their teenage peers who want to drive around with them while unsupervised by an adult Teenagers are being trained and supervised while driving with their parents or guardian during the learner’s permit stage and the intermediate GDL stage | Teenagers will not be allowed to drive when it is nighttime unless supervised by an adult | Teenagers, passengers, and parents will understand the importance of complying with the passenger and nighttime restriction for their safety and well being |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kiriakou, S. (2020). Graduated Driver Licensing: California Program. In: Volpe, R. (eds) Casebook of Traumatic Injury Prevention. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27419-1_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27419-1_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27418-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27419-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)