Skip to main content

Preventing Infections in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an uncommon complication after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) but leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Prevention is one of the most important strategies in combating PJI after UKA. There are many prevention strategies, and they can be categorized as preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative. Preoperative strategies emphasize medically optimizing the host, modifying patient risk factors for PJI, appropriate skin cleansing, and infection screening. Intraoperative strategies are focused on creating and maintaining a sterile environment, antibiotic prophylaxis, and limiting operating room time. Postoperative strategies are focused on avoiding allogeneic blood transfusions, utilizing aspirin for venous thromboembolic event prophylaxis, and antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental, genitourinary, or gastrointestinal procedures. Future research is warranted to determine the most cost-effective and clinically efficacious strategies to preventing PJI after UKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ryu KJCORR. Insights®: infection after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a high risk of subsequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;Publish Ahead of Print:1; https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000437.

  2. Brown NM, Sheth NP, Davis K, Berend ME, Lombardi AV, Berend KR, et al. Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. J Arthroplast. 2012;27:86–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiranek W, Kigera JWM, Klatt BA, Küçükdurmaz F, Lieberman J, Moser C, et al. General assembly, prevention, host risk mitigation - general factors: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections. J Arthroplast. 2018;34:S43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Webster J, Osborne S. Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(26):CD004985. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004985.pub5.

  5. Shohat N, Parvizi J. Prevention of Periprosthetic joint infection: examining the recent guidelines. J Arthroplast. 2017;32:2040–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kapadia BH, Zhou PL, Jauregui JJ, Mont MA. Does preadmission cutaneous chlorhexidine preparation reduce surgical site infections after Total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:1592–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4767-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kapadia BH, Elmallah RK, Mont MA. A randomized, clinical trial of preadmission chlorhexidine skin preparation for lower extremity Total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:2856–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aggarwal VK, Tischler EH, Lautenbach C, Williams GR, Abboud JA, Altena M, et al. Mitigation and education. J Arthroplast. 2014;29:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartzokas CA, Johnson R, Jane M, Martin MV, Pearce PK, Saw Y. Relation between mouth and haematogenous infection in total joint replacements. BMJ. 1994;309:506–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Young H, Hirsh J, Hammerberg EM, Price CS. Dental disease and periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:162–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tokarski AT, Patel RG, Parvizi J, Deirmengian GK. Dental clearance prior to elective arthroplasty may not be needed for everyone. J Arthroplast. 2014;29:1729–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moroski NM, Woolwine S, Schwarzkopf R. Is preoperative staphylococcal decolonization efficient in Total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:444–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Herwaldt LA, Cullen JJ, French P, Hu J, Pfaller MA, Wenzel RP, et al. Preoperative risk factors for nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25:481–4. https://doi.org/10.1086/502426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sporer SM, Rogers T, Abella L. Methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization to reduce surgical site infection in elective Total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:144–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Courville XF, Tomek IM, Kirkland KB, Birhle M, Kantor SR, Finlayson SRG. Cost-effectiveness of preoperative nasal mupirocin treatment in preventing surgical site infection in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33:152–9. https://doi.org/10.1086/663704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen AF, Heyl AE, Xu PZ, Rao N, Klatt BA. Preoperative decolonization effective at reducing staphylococcal colonization in total joint arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplast. 2013;28:18–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips M, Rosenberg A, Shopsin B, Cuff G, Skeete F, Foti A, et al. Preventing surgical site infections: a randomized, open-label trial of nasal mupirocin ointment and nasal povidone-iodine solution. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:826–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/676872.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Torres EG, Lindmair-Snell JM, Langan JW, Burnikel BG. Is preoperative nasal povidone-iodine as efficient and cost-effective as standard methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening protocol in Total joint arthroplasty? J Arthroplast. 2016;31:215–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. AlBuhairan B, Hind D, Hutchinson A. Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:915–9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20498.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Peel TN, Cheng AC, Buising KL, Choong PFM. Microbiological aetiology, epidemiology, and clinical profile of prosthetic joint infections: are current antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines effective? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:2386–91. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.06246-11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guideline Writers Workgroup. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Am J Surg. 2005;189:395–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hansen E, Belden K, Silibovsky R, Vogt M, Arnold WV, Bicanic G, et al. Perioperative antibiotics. J Arthroplast. 2014;29:29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rybak MJ, Lomaestro BM, Rotschafer JC, Moellering RC, Craig WA, Billeter M, et al. Vancomycin therapeutic guidelines: a summary of consensus recommendations from the infectious diseases Society of America, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:325–7. https://doi.org/10.1086/600877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan TL, Springer BD, Ruder JA, Ruffolo MR, Chen AF. Is vancomycin-only prophylaxis for patients with penicillin allergy associated with increased risk of infection after arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:1601–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4672-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenberg AD, Wambold D, Kraemer L, Begley-Keyes M, Zuckerman SL, Singh N, et al. Ensuring appropriate timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:226–32. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Owens CD, Stoessel K. Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70(Suppl 2):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(08)60017-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor T, Tanner J. Razors versus clippers. A randomised controlled trial. Br J Perioper Nurs. 2005;15:518–20–522–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Edmiston CE, Okoli O, Graham MB, Sinski S, Seabrook GR. Evidence for using chlorhexidine gluconate preoperative cleansing to reduce the risk of surgical site infection. AORN J. 2010;92:509–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2010.01.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dumville JC, McFarlane E, Edwards P, Lipp A, Holmes A, Liu Z. Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(120):CD003949. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003949.pub4.

  30. Maiwald M, Chan ESY. The forgotten role of alcohol: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and perceived role of chlorhexidine in skin antisepsis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hibbard JS, Mulberry GK, Brady AR. A clinical study comparing the skin antisepsis and safety of ChloraPrep, 70% isopropyl alcohol, and 2% aqueous chlorhexidine. J Infus Nurs. 2002;25:244–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Milandt N, Nymark T, Jørn Kolmos H, Emmeluth C, Overgaard S. Iodine-impregnated incision drape and bacterial recolonization in simulated total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2016;87:380–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1180577.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bitkover CY, Marcusson E, Ransjö U. Spread of coagulase-negative staphylococci during cardiac operations in a modern operating room. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1110–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rezapoor M, Alvand A, Jacek E, Paziuk T, Maltenfort MG, Parvizi J. Operating room traffic increases aerosolized particles and compromises the air quality: a simulated study. J Arthroplast. 2018;33:851–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Quraishi ZA, Blais FX, Sottile WS, Adler LM. Movement of personnel and wound contamination. AORN J. 1983;38:146–7–150–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pokrywka M, Byers K. Traffic in the operating room: a review of factors influencing air flow and surgical wound contamination. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2013;13:156–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Young SW, Zhu M, Shirley OC, Wu Q, Spangehl MJ. Do “Surgical helmet Systems” or “body exhaust suits” affect contamination and deep infection rates in arthroplasty? A systematic review. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:225–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tayton ER, Frampton C, Hooper GJ, Young SW. The impact of patient and surgical factors on the rate of infection after primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 64,566 joints from the New Zealand joint registry. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B:334–40. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.36775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Singh S, Reddy S, Shrivastava R. Does laminar airflow make a difference to the infection rates for lower limb arthroplasty: a study using the National Joint Registry and local surgical site infection data for two hospitals with and without laminar airflow. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27:261–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1852-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bischoff P, Kubilay NZ, Allegranzi B, Egger M, Gastmeier P. Effect of laminar airflow ventilation on surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:553–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30059-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sikka RS, Prielipp RC. Forced air warming devices in orthopaedics: a focused review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e200–1–7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Austin PN. Forced-air warmers and surgical site infections in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2017;35:179–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shirozu K, Kai T, Setoguchi H, Ayagaki N, Hoka S. Effects of forced air warming on airflow around the operating table. Anesthesiology. 2018;128:79–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001929.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Espehaug B, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE, Havelin LI, Langeland N. Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty. Review of 10,905 primary cemented total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register, 1987 to 1995. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:590–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bohm E, Zhu N, Gu J, de Guia N, Linton C, Anderson T, et al. Does adding antibiotics to cement reduce the need for early revision in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:162–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3186-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Khan RJK, Fick D, Yao F, Tang K, Hurworth M, Nivbrant B, et al. A comparison of three methods of wound closure following arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:238–42. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.16923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Liu S, Wang Y, Kotian RN, Li H, Mi Y, Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of nonabsorbable and absorbable suture in Total knee arthroplasty. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:7563–9. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910785.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Chan VWK, Chan P-K, Chiu K-Y, Yan C-H, Ng F-Y. Does barbed suture lower cost and improve outcome in Total knee arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplast. 2017;32:1474–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sah AP. Is there an advantage to knotless barbed suture in TKA wound closure? A randomized trial in simultaneous bilateral TKAs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:2019–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4157-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Apisarnthanarak A, Singh N, Bandong AN, Madriaga G. Triclosan-coated sutures reduce the risk of surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36:169–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2014.22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sprowson AP, Jensen C, Parsons N, Partington P, Emmerson K, Carluke I, et al. The effect of triclosan-coated sutures on the rate of surgical site infection after hip and knee arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial of 2546 patients. Bone Joint J. 2018.;100-B;100-B:296–302. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B3.BJJ-2017-0247.R1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Wyles CC, Jacobson SR, Houdek MT, Larson DR, Taunton MJ, Sim FH, et al. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: running subcuticular closure enables the Most robust perfusion after TKA: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4209-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hopper GP, Deakin AH, Crane EO, Clarke JV. Enhancing patient recovery following lower limb arthroplasty with a modern wound dressing: a prospective, comparative audit. J Wound Care. 2012;21:200–3. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2012.21.4.200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Abuzakuk TM, Coward P, Shenava Y, Kumar VS, Skinner JA. The management of wounds following primary lower limb arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised study comparing hydrofibre and central pad dressings. Int Wound J. 2006;3:133–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Cai J, Karam JA, Parvizi J, Smith EB, Sharkey PF. Aquacel surgical dressing reduces the rate of acute PJI following Total joint arthroplasty: a case–control study. J Arthroplast. 2014;29:1098–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.11.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Grosso MJ, Berg A, LaRussa S, Murtaugh T, Trofa DP, Geller JA. Silver-impregnated occlusive dressing reduces rates of acute Periprosthetic joint infection after Total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2017;32:929–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Nam D, Sershon RA, Levine BR, Valle Della CJ. The use of closed incision negative-pressure wound therapy in Orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26:295–302. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Al-Houraibi RK, Aalirezaie A, Adib F, Anoushiravani A, Bhashyam A, Binlaksar R, et al. General assembly, prevention, wound management: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections. J Arthroplast. 2018;34:S157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bohl DD, Ondeck NT, Darrith B, Hannon CP, Fillingham YA, Valle Della CJ. Impact of operative time on adverse events following primary Total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2018;33:2256–2262.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Namba RS, Inacio MCS, Paxton EW. Risk factors associated with deep surgical site infections after primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 56,216 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:775–82. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Schweizer ML, Callaghan JJ. The incidence of and risk factors for 30-day surgical site infections following primary and revision Total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Jacobs JJ, Mont MA, Bozic KJ, Valle Della CJ, Goodman SB, Lewis CG, et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic surgeons clinical practice guideline on: preventing venous thromboembolic disease in patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:746–7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.9408.ebo746.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Arnold WV, Bari AK, Buttaro M, Huang R, Mirez JP, Neira I, et al. General assembly, prevention, postoperative factors: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections. J Arthroplast. 2018;34:S169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kulshrestha V, Kumar S. DVT prophylaxis after TKA: routine anticoagulation vs risk screening approach - a randomized study. J Arthroplast. 2013;28:1868–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kim JL, Park J-H, Han S-B, Cho IY, Jang K-M. Allogeneic blood transfusion is a significant risk factor for surgical-site infection following Total hip and knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplast. 2017;32:320–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Everhart JS, Sojka JH, Mayerson JL, Glassman AH, Scharschmidt TJ. Perioperative allogeneic red blood-cell transfusion associated with surgical site infection after Total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2018;100:288–94. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.00237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1710–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0209-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Ong KL, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry DJ, Parvizi J. Prosthetic joint infection risk after total hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Arthroplast. 2009;24:105–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig J. J. Della Valle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hannon, C.P., Della Valle, C.J.J. (2020). Preventing Infections in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. In: Gerlinger, T. (eds) Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27411-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27411-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27410-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27411-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics