Advertisement

Global Shifts and Their Impact on Russia-EU Strategic Communication

  • Evgeny PashentsevEmail author
Chapter
First Online:
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the changes in the global economy and geopolitics in the context of great shifts in technologies with special attention to artificial intelligence, robotics, cyborgization and human genetic engineering. Besides the current race of different countries in the development of the existing narrow artificial intelligence, the author analyses different global consequences of possible creation of general artificial intelligence. The author characterizes the current unstable dynamic social equilibrium and the prospect models for future social development. The author also examines the level of adaptation of these new realities, via strategic communication, by the EU and Russia, who are both strategic actors of the current world order ready for future great challenges that promise to transform mankind more radically than has ever happened before.

Keywords

Global shifts Sophisticated technologies Strategic communication Artificial intelligence Genetic engineering The European Union Russia 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson S (2016) Immigrants and billion dollar startups. National Foundation for American Policy – NFAP Policy Brief, March. National Foundation for American Policy, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  2. Baggaley K (2017) There are two kinds of AI, and the difference is important. Popular Science. 23 Feb. https://www.popsci.com/narrow-and-general-ai. Accessed 11 May 2019
  3. Bank of America and Merrill Lynch (2015) Creative disruption: the impact of emerging technologies on the creative economy. World Economic Forum, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  4. Bank of England (2015) Labour’s share – a speech by Andy Haldane, chief economist. News Release. 12 Nov. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/news/2015/november/labours-share-speech-by-andy-haldane.pdf?la=en&hash=C6EAEB5422EAAE9270B4C0EF1D38288A838F2652. Accessed 24 May 2019
  5. Baum SD (2017) A survey of artificial general intelligence projects for ethics, risk, and policy. Global Catastrophic Risk Institute, StockholmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumgartner F, Jones BD (1993) Agendas and Instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertalanffy L (1969) General system theory. George Brazillier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. BGI (2018) About BGI. 12 Feb. www.bgi.com/global/company/about-bgi/. Accessed 7 May 2018
  9. Bogdanov A (1989) Tektologija: vseobshhaja organizacionnaja nauka (Tectology: universal organizational science). Ekonomika, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  10. Bostrom N (2014) Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Brzezinski Z (2012) Strategic vision: America and the crisis of global power. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Chace C (2018) Artificial intelligence and the two singularities. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  13. Chalmers D (2010) The singularity: a philosophical analysis. J of Consciousness Studies 17:7–65Google Scholar
  14. China Copyright and Media (2017) A next generation artificial intelligence development plan. China copyright and media. 20 Jul. Updated on 1 Aug. https://chinacopyrightandmedia.wordpress.com/2017/07/20/a-next-generation-artificial-intelligence-development-plan/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  15. Cunningham AC (ed) (2017) Artificial intelligence and the technological singularity. Greenhaven Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Dickson B (2017) What is narrow, general and super artificial intelligence. TechTalks. 12 May. https://bdtechtalks.com/2017/05/12/what-is-narrow-general-and-super-artificial-intelligence/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  17. Djankov S (2015) Russia’s economy under Putin: from crony capitalism to state capitalism. Peterson Institute for International Economics. https://piie.com/publications/pb/pb15-18.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2019
  18. Echo of Moscow (2018) Putin rasterjal doverie rossijan – indeks odobrenija Prezidenta za god ruhnul v 2 raza (Putin has lost the trust of Russians – the index of approval of the President for the year collapsed 2 times). https://echo.msk.ru/blog/kremlmother/2320864-echo/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  19. Edelman (2019) 19th Edelman trust barometer. https://www.edelman.com/research/edelman-trust-barometer-archive. Accessed 11 May 2019
  20. Elliott L (2015) Robots threaten 15m UK jobs, says Bank of England’s chief economist. The Guardian. 15 Nov. www.theguardian.com/business/2015/nov/12/robots-threaten-low-paid-jobs-says-bank-of-england-chief-economist. Accessed 11 May 2019
  21. Eror A (2013) China Is engineering genius babies. Vice. 15 Mar. www.vice.com/en_us/article/5gw8vn/chinas-taking-over-the-world-with-a-massive-genetic-engineering-program. Accessed 11 May 2019
  22. Eugenios J (2015) Ray Kurzweil: Humans will be hybrids by 2030. CNN Tech. 4 Jun. https://money.cnn.com/2015/06/03/technology/ray-kurzweil-predictions/index.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  23. Euractiv (2013) Record 60% of Europeans “tend not to trust” EU. 25 Jun. https://www.euractiv.com/section/elections/news/record-60-of-europeans-tend-not-to-trust-eu/ Accessed 11 May 2019
  24. European Commission (2018a) Press release. Member States and Commission to work together to boost artificial intelligence “made in Europe”. 7 Dec. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-6689_en.htm. Accessed 11 May 2019
  25. European Commission (2018b) Press release. EU budget: Commission proposes most ambitious Research and Innovation programme yet. 7 Jul. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-4041_en.htm. Accessed 11 May 2019
  26. European Commission (2018c) Press release. EU budget: Commission proposes €9.2 billion investment in first ever digital programme. 6 Jun. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-4043_en.htm. Accessed 11 May 2019
  27. European Parliament (2017) Resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL). www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2017-0051+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN#BKMD-13. Accessed 11 May 2019
  28. European Parliament (2019) Resolution of 12 March on the state of EU-Russia political relations. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P8-TA-2019-0157&language=EN. Accessed 11 May 2019
  29. European Union (2018) Eurostatistics. Feb. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  30. Everitt T, Goertzel B, Potapov A (eds) (2017) Artificial general intelligence. 10th international conference on artificial general intelligence, Melbourne, 15–18 August 2017. Lecture notes in computer science (Lecture notes in artificial intelligence), vol 10414. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  31. Executive Office of the President, National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Technology (2016) Preparing for the Future. National Science and Technology Council of Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Expert Rating Agency (2008) Macroeconomic and institutional prerequisites for the successful development of the financial sector. https://raexpert.ru/strategy/conception/part1/part2/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  33. Forbes (2019) Billionaires 2019. https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/#43ade4b4251c. Accessed 24 May 2019
  34. Frase P (2016) Four futures: life after capitalism. Verso, London – New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Frey CB, Osborne M (2013) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Oxford Martin School, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Frey CB, Osborne M (2016) Technology at work v.2.0. The future is not what it used to be. Oxford Martin School, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  37. Giaritelli A (2016) Trump’s new foreign policy: “We will stop looking to topple regimes”. Washington Examiner. 01 Dec. www.washingtonexaminer.com/trumps-new-foreign-policy-we-will-stop-looking-to-topple-regimes/article/2608687. Accessed 11 May 2019
  38. Gilens M, Page BI (2014) Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens. J Perspectives on Politics 12(3):564–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goertzel B (2016) AGI revolution: An inside view of the rise of artificial general intelligence. Humanity+ Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  40. Goertzel B, Pennachin C (eds) (2007) Artificial general intelligence. Springer, Berlin – HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  41. Goertzel B, Pennachin C, Geisweiller N (2014) Engineering general intelligence. Part 1: A path to advanced AGI via embodied learning and cognitive synergy. Atlantis Press, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gore A (2013) The Future. WH Allen, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Grace K, Salvatier J, Dafoe A, Zhang B, Evans O (2018) When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI experts. J of Artificial Intelligence Research 62:729–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hosman E (2016) Hateful politics infiltrate human genome editing debate in France. The Niche. 29 Jun. www.geneticsandsociety.org/biopolitical-times/hateful-politics-infiltrate-human-genome-editing-debate-france. Accessed 11 May 2019
  45. Iklé M, Franz A, Rzepka R, Goertzel B (eds) (2018) Artificial general intelligence. 11th international conference on artificial general intelligence, Prague, 22–25 August 2018. Lecture notes in computer science (Lecture notes in artificial intelligence), vol 10999. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  46. International Organization for Standardization (2019a) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42. Artificial intelligence. https://www.iso.org/committee/6794475.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  47. International Organization for Standardization (2019b) Participation. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42. Artificial Intelligence. https://www.iso.org/committee/6794475.html?view=participation. Accessed 11 May 2019
  48. Kessler S (2017) The optimist’s guide to the robot apocalypse // Quartz. 09.03.2017. URL: https://qz.com/904285/the-optimists-guide-to-the-robot-apocalypse/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  49. Komsomolskaya Pravda (2012) 620 tysjach rublej – i ty kandidat nauk! (620 thousand rubles – and you are a PhD!). 23 May. https://www.kp.ru/daily/25887/2848481/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  50. Lee K-F (2018) AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, BostonGoogle Scholar
  51. Lenin VI (1904) Pis’mo k tovarishhu o nashih organizacionnyh zadachah (A letter to a comrade on our organizational tasks). In: Lenin VI (1967) Complete collection of works, vol. 7. Moscow: Political Literature Publishers, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  52. Lind M (2013) Is revolution coming to the US? Salon. 7 May. http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/. Accessed 24 May 2019
  53. Lipton G (2019) Graphic Truth: Europeans Don’t Trust Europe. Gzero Media. 6 Mar. https://www.gzeromedia.com/graphic-truth-europeans-dont-trust-europe. Accessed 11 May 2019
  54. Lu Y, Qian D, Fu H, Chen W (2018) Will supercomputers be super-data and super-AI machines? J Communications of the ACM 61(11):82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Manjoo F (2017) Why Silicon Valley Wouldn’t Work Without Immigrants. The New York Times. 08 Feb. URL: www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  56. Manyika J, Chui M, Miremadi M, Bughin J, George K, Willmott P, Dewhurst M (2017) A future that works: automation, employment, and productivity. Executive summary. McKinsey Global Institute, San Francisco – Chicago – Brussels – New Jersey – LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. McCourt D (2019) A quarter of Europeans trust AI robots more than politicians. AndroidPIT Magazine. https://www.androidpit.com/europeans-trust-ai-robots-over-politicians. Accessed 11 May 2019
  58. Melnik M (2013) Strukturno-dinamicheskoe ravnovesie social’no-ekonomicheskih system (Structural-Dynamic Balance of Social and Economic Systems). J Chelovecheskij kapital (Human Asset) 11(59):45–51Google Scholar
  59. Merce CC, Merce E, Roman L (2015) Economic and social polarization of the world. J Analele Universității din Oradea, Fascicula: Ecotoxicologie, Zootehnie și Tehnologii de Industrie Alimentară (Annals of the University of Oradea: Ecotoxicology, Animal Husbandry and Food Industry Technologies) 14(B):309–316, ref. 7Google Scholar
  60. Merler S (2015) How do Europeans feel about the EU? World Economic Forum. 11 Jun. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/06/how-do-europeans-feel-about-the-eu/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  61. Mishra D, Deichmann U, Chomitz K, Hasnain Z, Kayser E, Kelly T, Kivine M, Larson B, Monroy-Taborda S, Sahnoun H, Santos I, Satola D, Schiffbauer M, BooKang S, Tan S, Welsum D (2016) Digital dividents. World development report. Overview. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  62. Mukhamedzyanova D (2017) Rossija ustanovila antirekord robotizacii (Russia has established an anti-record of robotization). Haitek (High-Tech). 1 Apr. https://hightech.fm/2017/04/11/robosector. Accessed 11 May 2019
  63. My Future America (2014) Simon Wiesenthal Center: Whitewashing Nazis in Eastern Europe Equate Nazism to Communism: Expert. 31 Oct. http://myfutureamerica.org/?p=5466. Accessed 11 May 2019
  64. Nacional’naja tehnologicheskaja iniciativa (National technology initiative) (2019) Competence centers. http://www.nti2035.ru/technology/competence. Accessed 11 May 2019
  65. Nasyrov E (2013) Fal’shivye dissertacii nachali vyjavljat’ desjatkami (Dozens of fake dissertations were identified). Chastniy Korrespondent (Private Correspondent). http://www.chaskor.ru/article/falshivye_dissertatsii_nachali_vyyavlyat_desyatkami_30887. Accessed 11 May 2019
  66. NSfuture (2009) Media and The CIA Predict The Next American Revolution, Rebellion and Resistance by 2014. YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtI_zspZBkI. Accessed 24 May 2019
  67. Novokmet F, Piketty T, Yang L, Zucman G (2018) From communism to capitalism: private versus public property and inequality in China and Russia. American economic association papers and proceedings 108:109–113.  https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181074. Accessed 24 May 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. OECD (2017) Understanding the Socio-Economic Divide in Europe. Background Report. 26 Jan. OECD Centre for Opportunity and Equality, ParisGoogle Scholar
  69. Parsons T (1978) Action Theory and the Human Condition. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Partnership for a New American Economy (2011) The “New American” fortune 500: a report. Partnership for a New American Economy, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Pashentsev EN (1990) Krizis i obshhestvo (Crisis and Society). Slovo Fund, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  72. Pashentsev EN (1992) Levye partii Rossii: problemy i perspektivy (The Left Parties of Russia: Problems and Prospects). J Zarubezhnyj vestnik (Foreign Bulletin) 2:23–37Google Scholar
  73. Pashentsev EN (1993) The modern crisis and political alternatives in Russia. J Russian Progressive Review 3:23–31Google Scholar
  74. Pashentsev EN (1994) Russia’s left political movement. J Russian Progressive Review 3:46–59Google Scholar
  75. Pashentsev EN (1997) The Left Parties of Russia. SIMS Ltd., MoscowGoogle Scholar
  76. Pol E, Reveley J (2017) Robot-induced technological unemployment: towards a youth-focused coping strategy. J Psychosociological issues in human resource management 5(2):169–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Popov V, Sundaram JK (2017) What Explains the Post-Soviet Russian Economic Collapse? The Wire. 10 Jun. https://thewire.in/economy/post-soviet-russian-economic-collapse. Accessed 22.05.2019
  78. Rao AS, Verweij G (2018) Sizing the Prize. What’s the Real Value of AI for Your Business and How Can You Capitalise? PWC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. RBC (2019) Rossija zanjala poslednee mesto rejtinga doverija k obshhestvennym institutam (Russia took the last place in the rating of trust in public institutions). https://www.rbc.ru/society/22/01/2019/5c4632139a7947d392889cfd. Accessed 11 May 2019
  80. Reedy C (2017) Kurzweil Claims That the Singularity Will Happen by 2045. Futurism. 05 Oct. https://futurism.com/kurzweil-claims-that-the-singularity-will-happen-by-2045/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  81. Regnum (2018) Sociologi zajavili o snizhenii doverija grazhdan RF k institutam vlasti (Sociologists announced a decrease in the confidence of Russian citizens in the institutions of power). 4 Oct. https://regnum.ru/news/2494482.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  82. Remizov D (2017) Chinovniki i deputaty nosjat uchenuju stepen’, kak bantik (Officials and MPs wear academic degree of, as a ribbon). Rosbalt. 10 Apr. http://www.rosbalt.ru/russia/2017/10/04/1650789.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  83. Reynolds S (2006) Nuffield Poultry Study Group. Visit to Russia. 6–14 October. Nuffield farming scholarship trust, Nuffield, UKGoogle Scholar
  84. RIA Novosti (2017) Putin rasskazal o tehnologijah bolee strashnyh, chem jadernaja bomba (Putin told about technologies more terrible than a nuclear bomb). 21 Oct. https://ria.ru/20171021/1507317926.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  85. Robles P (2018) China plans to be a world leader in Artificial Intelligence by 2030. South China Morning Post. 1 Oct. https://multimedia.scmp.com/news/china/article/2166148/china-2025-artificial-intelligence/index.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  86. Robogeek (2016) Promyshlennaja robotizacija v Rossii (Industrial Robotics in Russia). 27 Sep. www.robogeek.ru/intervyu/promyshlennaya-robotizatsiya-v-rossii. Accessed 11 May 2019
  87. Rothwell J (2017) Myths of the 1 percent: what puts people at the top. The New York Times. 17 Nov. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/17/upshot/income-inequality-united-states.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  88. RT (2017) Whoever leads in AI will rule the world: Putin to Russian children on Knowledge Day. 01 Sep. www.rt.com/news/401731-ai-rule-world-putin/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  89. Schmidt E, Thrun S (2016) Let’s Stop Freaking Out About Artificial Intelligence. Fortune. 28 Jun. http://fortune.com/2016/06/28/artificial-intelligence-potential/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  90. Sharma K (2018) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Market to Garner $169,411.8 Million, Globally, by 2025. Allied Market Research. https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/press-release/artificial-intelligence-market.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  91. Siddique H (2016) British researchers get green light to genetically modify human embryos. The Guardian. 1 Feb. www.theguardian.com/science/2016/feb/01/human-embryo-genetic-modify-regulator-green-light-research. Accessed 11 May 2019
  92. Simon CJ (2018) Will computers revolt? Preparing for the future of artificial intelligence. Future AI, Annapolis, MDGoogle Scholar
  93. Simons G, Sillanpaa A (eds) (2016) The Kremlin and Daesh Information Activities. NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence, RigaGoogle Scholar
  94. Simons JW (2019) Exclusive: We’ll write your PhD thesis… for £6,173! British students cheat their way to doctorates by paying companies to write their dissertations. Daily Mail Online. 30 Mar. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6861373/British-students-cheat-way-doctorates-paying-companies-write-dissertations.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  95. Solon O (2017) Elon Musk says humans must become cyborgs to stay relevant. Is he right? The Guardian. 15 Feb. www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/15/elon-musk-cyborgs-robots-artificial-intelligence-is-he-right. Accessed 11 May 2019
  96. Sputnik (2006) Russia to restore GDP, industry by 2007 end, no oil price fears. 22 Sep. https://sputniknews.com/russia/2006092254177388/. Accessed 22.05.2019
  97. Stow N (2019) Bad Education. British uni students cheating their way to PhD – by paying £6k for expert to write dissertation. The Sun. 30 Mar. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8754255/british-uni-sstudents-cheat-phd-pay-dissertation/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  98. Superjob.ru (2016) Rynok truda: itogi 2016, prognozy 2017 (The labor market: results of the forecasts for 2016 to 2017). 16 Dec. https://www.superjob.ru/research/articles/112068/rynok-truda/. Accessed 11 May 2019
  99. The Moscow Times (2019) 8 Russians named among world’s 100 richest billionaires—Forbes. 5 Mar. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/03/05/8-russians-named-among-worlds-100-richest-billionaires-forbes-a64714. Accessed 24 May 2019
  100. The World Bank (2017) Constant GDP per capita for the Russian Federation. Federal Reserve Economic Data – FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/NYGDPPCAPKDRUS. Accessed 24 May 2019
  101. The World Bank (2019) GDP per capita (constant 2010 US$). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD. Accessed 22.05.2019
  102. Trading Economics (2019a) Russia GDP. https://tradingeconomics.com/russia/gdp. Accessed 11 May 2019
  103. Trading Economics (2019b) European Union GDP. https://tradingeconomics.com/european-union/gdp. Accessed 19 Apr 2019
  104. UN Conference on Trade and Development (2016) Robots and industrialization in developing countries. Policy Brief 50. Oct. https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/presspb2016d6_en.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2019
  105. US Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2018) Report to Congressional Committees National Security. Long-Range Emerging Threats Facing the United States as Identified by Federal Agencies. GAO-19-204SP. GAO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  106. Voennoe obozrenie (Military Review) (2017) Razrabotchik nazval Rossiju liderom v sozdanii boevyh robotov (The developer called Russia a leader in the creation of combat robots). 29 Nov. https://topwar.ru/130757-razrabotchik-nazval-rossiyu-liderom-v-sozdanii-boevyh-robotov.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  107. Vzglyad (View) (2017) ES poobeshhal Kievu finansovuju pomoshh’ v obmen na ukrainskij les (The EU promised financial aid to Kiev in exchange for the Ukrainian forest). Vzglyad (View) – Business Newspaper. 10 Feb. https://vz.ru/news/2017/2/10/857495.html. Accessed 11 May 2019
  108. Wang P, Goertzel B (eds) (2012) Theoretical foundations of artificial general intelligence. Atlantis Press, ParisGoogle Scholar
  109. Winters JA, Page BI (2009) Oligarchy in the United States? J Perspectives on Politics 7(4):731 – 751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. World Economic Forum (2016) The Future of Jobs Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Executive Summary. World Economic Forum, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  111. Zuroff E (2009) The Nazi whitewash. The Guardian. 28 Sep. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/sep/28/eric-pickles-tories-latvia-nazi. Accessed 11 May 2019
  112. Zvezdina N, Kazakunova G, Gavrilko-Alekseev A (2018) Jeksperty nazvali vuzy—rekordsmeny po zashhite “fal’shivyh” dissertacij (Experts identified the universities – champions for the ‘fake’ dissertations). RBC. 17 Jan. https://www.rbc.ru/society/17/01/2018/5a5c5fcc9a79470152e8bbe9. Accessed 11 May 2019

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian FederationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options