Character Assassination as Strategic Communication in EU-Russia Relations

  • Sergei A. SamoilenkoEmail author
  • Marlene LaruelleEmail author


This chapter examines character assassination as a set of strategies used by conflicting parties in international affairs. Specifically, it views character assassination as strategic communication embedded in the context of political standoff. Mass media manufacture political conflicts by incorporating character assassination into their framing strategies and tactics. The chapter highlights differences between the European Union (EU) and Russia in their strategic application of character assassination, which inevitably contributes to the current geopolitical tensions between the parties. The authors advocate for future research into character assassination as strategic communication in the areas of international affairs, public diplomacy, and crisis communication.


International affairs Character assassination Strategic communication Framing Gayropa Enmification 


  1. Altheide DL (2006) Terrorism and the politics of fear. Altamira Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson PJ (2004) The greater non-communicator? The mass communication deficit of the European Parliament and its Press Directorate. J of Common Market Studies 42:5:897–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspriadis N, Takas E, Samaras AN (2019) Country reputation assassination during the Greek memorandum re-negotiations. In: Samoilenko SA, Icks M, Keohane J, Shiraev E (eds), The Routledge handbook of character assassination and reputation management. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakhtin MM (1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  5. BBC (2014) Strip Russia of World Cup – Clegg. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  6. Boffey D (2018) Russia-bashing must stop, says Jean-Claude Juncker. The Guardian. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  7. Botan CH (2006) Grand strategy, strategy and tactics in public relations. In: Botan CH, Hazleton V (eds), Public relations theory II. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, p 223–247Google Scholar
  8. Botan CH (2017) Strategic communication: Theory and practice. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  9. Botan C, Soto F (1998) A semiotic approach to the internal functioning of publics: Implications for strategic communication and public relations. Public Relations Review 24:21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Browning L, Morris GH (2012) Stories of life in the workplace: An open architecture for organizational narratology. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burrett T (2011) Television and presidential power in Putin’s Russia. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Casier T, DeBardeleben J (2017) EU-Russia relations in crisis: Understanding diverging perceptions. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castiglioni F (2012) The chilly wind of crisis. The European. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  14. Cienski J (2019) Murder of Gdańsk mayor highlights Poland’s polarization. Politico. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  15. Congressional Research Service (2018) The European Union: Ongoing challenges and future prospects. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  16. Daucé F (2015) The duality of coercion in Russia: Cracking down on “foreign agents”. Demokratizatsiya: The J of Post-Soviet Democratization 23:1:57–75.Google Scholar
  17. DeBardeleben J (2016) Backdrop to the Ukraine crisis: The revival of normative politics in Russia’s relations with the EU? In: Kanet RE, Sussex M (eds) Power, politics and confrontation in Eurasia. Foreign policy in a contested region. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, p 161–185Google Scholar
  18. Dewey J (1927) The public and its problems. Henry Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Entman RM (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J of Communication 43:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Entman RM (2004) Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Esser F (2013) Mediatization as challenge: Media logic versus political logic. In: Kriesi H, Lavenex S, Esser F et al. (eds) Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, p 155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Euractiv (2014) It’s official: Last EU election had lowest-ever turnout. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  23. Euromaidan Press (2017) The Nazi-obsession of pro-Kremlin propagandists. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  24. European Parliament Think Tank (2018) The EU’s Russia policy: Five guiding principles. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  25. EUvsDisinfo (2017) Russian TV: Council of Europe a “gay park” and warnings of a “big war” in Ukraine. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  26. Filatova O, Bolgov R (2018) Strategic communication in the context of modern information confrontation: EU and NATO vs Russia and ISIS. In: Hurley JS, Chen JQ (eds) ICCWS 2018: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, Washington, DC, USA, 8–9 March 2018. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Ltd., Sonning Common, UK, p 208–218.Google Scholar
  27. Foxall A (2019) From Evropa to Gayropa: A critical geopolitics of the European Union as seen from Russia. J Geopolitics 24:1:174–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haller M (2008) European integration as an elite process: The failure of a dream? Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Habermas J (1962) Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft (The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society). Neuwied, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  30. Harre R, Langenhove LV (1991) Varieties of positioning. J for the Theory of Social Behaviour 21:4:393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hellberg U (2011) Securitization as a modern strategy of constructing identity: ‘Negative proof identity’ in the European Union. Malmö University Conference PapersGoogle Scholar
  32. Herman ES, Chomsky N (1988) Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Icks M, Shiraev E (2014) Character assassination throughout the ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kettley S (2017) Polish reject ‘EU occupation’: Voices rise for Polexit as Brussels ‘regressing’ nation. Daily Express. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  35. Knight B (2018) How oligarchs captured Central Europe’s media. Deutsche Welle. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  36. Korosteleva E (2017) Putting the EU Global Security Strategy to test: ‘Cooperative orders’ and othering in EU-Russia relations. J International Politics 20:94:1–17Google Scholar
  37. Laruelle M (2017) Putin’s regime and the ideological market: A difficult balancing game. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Task Force White Paper. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  38. Levitsky S (2010) Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewis J (2012) Terrorism and news narratives. In: Freedman D, Thussu DK (eds) Media and terrorism: Global perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, p 257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luxmoore M (2015) Putin’s No-Spin Zone. Foreign Policy, December 28, 2015,
  41. Maass A-S (2016) EU-Russia relations, 1999–2015: From courtship to confrontation. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Manners I, Murray P (2016) The End of a Noble narrative? European integration narratives after the Nobel Peace Prize. J of Common Market Studies 54:1:185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marshall MG, Gurr TR (2014) Polity IV individual country regime trends, 1946–2013. Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2013. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  44. Mehta A (2018) Estonia’s defense minister Juri Luik on Russian threats and defending the Baltics. DefenseNews. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  45. Meraz S, Papacharissi Z (2013) Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International J of Press/Politics 18:2:138–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Merler S (2015) How do Europeans feel about the EU? World Economic Forum. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  47. Meyer C (1999) Political legitimacy and the invisibility of politics: Exploring the European Union’s communication deficit. J of Common Market Studies 37:4:617–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mickiewicz E (2008) Television, power, and the public in Russia. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mr Boss (2015) Yevropa tsarstvo geev Territoriya zabluzhdeniy s Igorem Prokopenko 2015 (Europe, the Kingdom of gays. The territory of misconceptions with Igor Prokopenko 2015). YouTube. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  50. Neumann I (1998) Uses of the other: “The East” in European identity formation. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  51. Nicotera AM, Mahon MM (2013) Between rocks and hard places: Exploring the impact of structurational divergence in the nursing workplace. Management Communication Quarterly 27:1:90–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ojuland K (2013) Why the EU needs a Magnitsky Act. Politico. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  53. O’Keefe DJ (2002) Persuasion: Theory and research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  54. Pearce B, Littlejohn S, Alexander AA (1989) The Quixotic quest for civility: Patterns of interaction between the new Christian right and secular humanists. In: Hadden JK, Shupe A (eds) Secularization and fundamentalism reconsidered: Religion and the political order, vol. 3. Paragon, New York, p 152–177Google Scholar
  55. Petrov N, Lipman M, Hale, H (2014) Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia from Putin to Putin. J Post-Soviet Affairs 30:1:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pew Research Center (2018) Eastern and Western Europeans differ on importance of religion, views of minorities, and key social issues. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  57. Pézard S, Radin A, Szayna TS, Larrabee S (2017) European relations with Russia: threat perceptions, responses, and strategies in the wake of the Ukrainian crisis. Rand Corporation. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  58. Putin V (2013) Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  59. Putnam LL, Poole MS (1987) Conflict and negotiation. In: Jablin FM, Putnam LL, Roberts KH, Porter LW (eds) Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, p 549–599Google Scholar
  60. Rachlin A (1988) News as hegemonic reality: American political culture and the framing of news accounts. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Rácz A, Raik K (2018) EU-Russia relations in the new Putin era: Not much light at the end of the tunnel. Estonian Foreign Policy Institute. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  62. Reporters without Borders (2018) 2018 world press freedom index. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  63. Riabova T, Riabov O (2014) Gayromaidan: Gendered aspects of the hegemonic Russian media discourse on the Ukrainian crisis. J of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society 1(1): 83–107Google Scholar
  64. Rieber RW, Kelly RJ (1991) Substance and shadow: Images of the enemy. In: Rieber RW (ed) The psychology of war and peace: The image of the enemy. Springer, New York, p 3–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Robinson O (2018) Analysis: Guide to Russian political talk shows. BBC Monitoring. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  66. Rothrock K (2017) Russian TV’s Favorite Chumps. The Moscow Times. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  67. Russia Insight (2015) Vladimir Zhirinovsky trolling John McCain and Angela Merkel. YouTube. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  68. Saburova O (2017) “Mezhdunarodnaya pilorama”: kak Keosayan opustilsya nizhe Kiseleva (“International sawmill”: as Keosayan fell below Kiselev). Sobesednik. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  69. Samoilenko SA (2016) Character assassination. In: Carroll C (ed) The encyclopedia of corporate reputation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, p 115–118Google Scholar
  70. Samoilenko SA (2019) Character assassination and reputation management in the context of mediated complexity. In: Sriramesh K, Verčič D (eds) The global public relations handbook: Theory, research, and practice. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Samoilenko SA, Erzikova E, Davydov S, Laskin AV (2017) Different media, same messages: Character assassination in the television news during the 2014 Ukrainian crisis. International Communication Research J 52(2): 31–52Google Scholar
  72. Sharafutdinova G (2014) The Pussy Riot affair and Putin’s démarche from sovereign democracy to sovereign morality. Nationalities Papers 42(4): 615–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shiraev E (2014) Character assassination: How political psychologists can assist historians. In: Icks M, Shiraev E (eds) Character assassination throughout the ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, p 15–36Google Scholar
  74. Shuster S (2014) Russians Rewrite History to Slur Ukraine Over War. Time, October 29, 2014,
  75. Simons G (2016) News and Syria: Creating key media moments in the conflict. Cogent Social Sciences 2:1–16Google Scholar
  76. Simons G (2019) The role of propaganda in the character assassination of world leaders in international affairs. In: Samoilenko SA, Icks M, Keohane J, Shiraev E (eds) The Routledge handbook of character assassination. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Snow N (2003) Information war: American propaganda, free speech and opinion control since 9/11. Seven Stories Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. Snyder J (1991) Myths of empire: Domestic politics and international ambitions. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  79. Štětka V (2015) The rise of oligarchs as media owners. In: Zielonka J (ed) Media and politics in new democracies: Europe in a comparative perspective. Oxford Scholarship Online. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  80. Stone J (2018) Brexit: Nigel Farage is a ‘fifth columnist’ Putin cheerleader, says Guy Verhofstadt. The Independent. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  81. Taylor PM (2003) Munitions of the mind: A history of propaganda from the ancient world to the present day. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  82. Tedeschi JT, Reiss M (1981) Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research. In: Tedeschi J (ed) Impression management theory and social psychological research. Academic Press, New York, p 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tolz V, Teper Y (2018) Broadcasting agitainment: A new media strategy of Putin’s third presidency. J Post-Soviet Affairs 34:4:213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tuman JS (2010) Communicating terror: The rhetorical dimensions of terrorism. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  85. Ukraine Crisis Media Center (2018) Image of Europe in Russian media: journalism or creation of enemy image? Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  86. Valenti C (2008) Political communication in international settings. The Case of the European Union. J of International Communication 14(2):102–116Google Scholar
  87. Van de Steeg M (2002) Rethinking the conditions for a public sphere in the European Union. European J of Social Theory 5(4):499–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Van Dijk TA (1998) Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  89. Wagnsson C, Hellman M (2018) Normative power Europe caving in? EU under pressure of Russian information warfare. J of Common Market Studies 56(5):1161–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Waller N (2019) European Parliament says Russia is no longer ‘a strategic partner’. New Europe. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  91. Walton D (1998) Ad Hominem arguments. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, ALGoogle Scholar
  92. Zwolski K (2018) European security in integration theory. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.George Washington UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations