Abstract
Violence tends to the destruction of meaningful entities and of that through which such entities are meaningful. Not all violence is annihilating in its effects, but violence aims towards a nothingness which discloses a certain fragility of meaning. The obliteration of the singular, the reduction of organic and structural unity to charred flesh and rubble, is not simply an event within a world, but an event that threatens worldly sense. The constitution of such worldly sense is dependent on time, on the interweaving of temporal tendencies, or orientations, in Husserlian terms: retention and protention. But this interweaving of temporal orientations requires a minimal order of continuity whereby retention, both near and far, and near and far protention allow for a sense of temporal stretch which has a unity and a sense. This is true even though every now may be new, temporal relations being of self-differentiation. Annihilating violence—whether of the individual raped and tortured or the community left bereft through war, colonization or natural disaster—has a traumatizing effect which results in a disconnection from the past and derealization of that which profoundly modifies the retentional and protentional orientations. The vulnerability of temporal constitution, which violence discloses, reveals a fundamental absence at the core of time itself and a nothingness threatening the stability of normalized meaningful entities and spaces while revealing a groundless space of the emergence of meaning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Dastur (2000) gives a powerful phenomenology of the surprising, but understands the surprising as a general term for what I am here distinguishing as the surprising, shocking and horrific. But the shocking and the horrific are themselves partly constituted by the surprising.
- 2.
Husserl notes himself that continuity is a paradigm here. See Husserl (2001, p. 48).
- 3.
The relation between this discussion and the later account of the chora in the Timaeus cannot be pursued here.
Bibliography
Amery, J. (2009). At the Mind’s Limits: Contemplations by a Survivor on Auschwitz and Its Realities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. London: Allen Lane.
Aristotle. (1984). The Physics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barthes, R. (2002). A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments. London: Vintage Classics.
Benjamin, W. (1968). Theses on the Philosophy of History. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 253–265). New York: Schocken Books.
Benjamin, W. (1986). The Critique of Violence. In Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings (E. Jephcott, Trans.) (pp. 277–300). New York: Schocken Books.
Bergson, H. (1991). Matter and Memory (N. M. Paul & W. S. Palmer, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.
Blanchot, M. (2015). The Writing the Disaster (A. Smock, Trans.). London: University of Nebraska Press.
Brison, S. (2011). Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of the Self. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Cavarero, A. (2009). Horrorism: Naming Contemporary Violence (W. McCuaig, Trans.) New York: Columbia University Press.
Dastur, F. (2000). Phenomenology of the Event: Waiting and Surprise. Hypatia, 15(4), 178–189.
Derrida, J. (1992). The Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundations of Authority”. In D. Connell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice (pp. 3–67). London: Routledge.
Husserl, E. (2001). In R. Bernet & D. Lohmar (Eds.), Die Bernauer Manuskripte über das Zeitbewusstsein (1917/18). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1965). The Structure of Behavior. London: Metheun.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the invisible (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013). The Phenomenology of Perception (D. Landes, Trans.). London: Routledge.
Ó Murchadha, F. (2002). Being and Ruination. Simmel and Heidegger on the Phenomenology of Ruins. Philosophy Today, 46(SPEP Supplement), 10–18.
Ó Murchadha, F. (2017). Speaking After the Phenomenon: The Promise of Things and the Future of Phenomenology. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 48(1), 99–115.
Plato. (1961a). Parmenides. In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.), The Complete Dialogues of Plato. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Plato. (1961b). Timaeus. In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.), The Complete Dialogues of Plato. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ratcliffe, M. (2017). Grief and the Unity of Emotions. Mid-West Studies in Philosophy, XLI, 154–174.
Ravaisson, F. (2009) Of Habit (C. Carlisle & M. Sinclaire, Trans.). London: Continuum.
Ricoeur, P. (1994). Time and Narrative vol. 1 (K. McLaughlin, Trans.) Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Simmel, G. (1996). “Die Ruine” in Philosophische Kultur. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Staudigl, M. (2015). Phänomenologie der Gewalt. Dordrecht: Springer.
Tengelyi, L. (2004). The Wild Region in Life-History. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ó Murchadha, F. (2019). The Temporality of Violence: Destruction, Dissolution and the Construction of Sense. In: Lauwaert, L., Smith, L., Sternad, C. (eds) Violence and Meaning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27173-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27173-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27172-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27173-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)