Abstract
From the perspective of an ethnomethodological (Garfinkel H, Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Prentice-Hall, 1967) approach of learning (Nishizaka A, Res Lang Soc Interact 39:119–154, 2006; Berducci D, Pragmat Cogn 19:476–506, 2011) and of a conversation analytic and multimodal approach of writing (Mondada L, Svinhufvud K, Language and Dialog 6:1–53, 2016), this chapter proposes to reconceptualise the connections between language, learning and literacy by examining their temporal and multimodal dimensions in social interaction. I focus on the case of the interactional processes through which a teacher and students teach and learn a foreign language with a textbook. Examination of the interactional processes specific to foreign language learning in the classroom presents two heuristic interests: (1) to show that within social interaction, practices such as talking, listening, reading and writing, are not strictly separated but are embedded within a single course of action. (2) observation of how participants articulate these practices within their interaction reflexively indicates how they organize the teaching/learning of a foreign language in an institutional setting.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149, 91–130.
Berducci, D. (2011). THIS → is learning: A learning process made public. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19, 476–506.
Breen, M. (1989). The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 187–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR). http://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages. Accessed 27 Sept 2017.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall: Polity Press.
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge University Press/Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Heritage, J., & Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Structures of social action studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jakonen, T. (2016). Gaining access to another participant’s writing in the classroom. Language and Dialogue, 6, 179–204.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerner, G. H. (2002). Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 225–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lubben, F., Campbell, B., Choshi, K., Hileni, K., Noah, G., & Utji, K.-M. (2003). Teachers’ use of textbooks: Practice in Namibian science classrooms. Educational Studies, 29, 109–125.
Luke, C., De Castell, S., & Luke, A. (1989). Beyond criticism: The authority of the schoolbook. In S. De Castell, A. Luke, & C. Luke (Eds.), Language, authority and criticism (pp. 245–260). London: Falmer Press.
McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183–213.
Mehan, H. (1979). ‘What time is it, Denise?’: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory Into Practice, 28, 285–294.
Mondada, L. (2001–2014). Conventions for multimodal transcription. https://franz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/franz/user_upload/redaktion/Mondada_conv_multimodality.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2018.
Mondada, L. (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1977–1997.
Mondada, L. (2013). Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-interaction. In P. Auer, M. Hilpert, A. Stukenbrock, & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Space in language and linguistics: Geographical, interactional and cognitive perspectives (pp. 247–275). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Mondada, L., & Svinhufvud, K. (2016). Writing-in-interaction, studying writing as a multimodal phenomenon in social interaction. Language and Dialogue, 6, 1–53.
Mori, J., & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27, 195–219.
Nishizaka, A. (2006). What to learn: The embodied structure of the environment. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39, 119–154.
Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In G. Rod & W. Johannes (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 346–380). London: Continuum.
Preston, A., Balaam, M., Seedhouse, P., Rafiev, A., Jackson, D., & Olivier, P. (2015). Can a kitchen teach languages? Linking theory and practice in the design of context-aware language learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 2, 1–19.
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel Abraham and Jefferson Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.
Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn : The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295–1345.
Seedhouse, P. (2013). Conversation analysis and classroom interaction. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 954–958). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Seedhouse, P., & Almutairi, S. (2009). A holistic approach to task-based interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 311–312.
Suchman, L. (1985). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Palo Alto: Palo Alto Research Center.
Weinbrenner, P. (1992). Methodologies of textbook analysis used to date. In H. Bourdillon (Ed.), History and social studies – Methodologies of textbook analysis (pp. 21–34). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lefebvre, A. (2019). The Anatomy of Learning a Foreign Language in Classroom with a Textbook: An Interactional and Multimodal Approach. In: Bagga-Gupta, S., Golden, A., Holm, L., Laursen, H., Pitkänen-Huhta, A. (eds) Reconceptualizing Connections between Language, Literacy and Learning. Educational Linguistics, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26994-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26994-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26993-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26994-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)