Abstract
Most imaging centers have more than one make and model of CT scanner in use across multiple locations within a hospital, city, or geographical region. These different scanners must fulfill identical imaging requests while often simultaneously realizing local site-specific exams. Many sites have in the hundreds of CT protocols to satisfy the hundreds of order sets a clinical diagnostic CT scanner receives. These clinical and logistical realities make CT protocol management challenging. This chapter defines this problem in more detail. We discuss strategies to address CT protocol management. We define a CT protocol from the perspective of clinical, compliance, workflow, and technical details. We discuss why we need a CT protocol optimization team and team membership. Lastly, we review solutions for documenting CT protocols and disseminating them to one’s CT scanner fleet.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boland GW. Enhancing CT productivity: strategies for increasing capacity. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(1):3–10.
ACR appropriateness criteria. American College of Radiology Web site. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria Accessed 23rd Jan 2019.
Brunnquell CL, Avey GD, Szczykutowicz TP. Objective evaluation of CT time efficiency in acute stroke response. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(6):876–80.
Szczykutowicz TP, Brunnquell CL, Avey GD, Bartels C, Belden DS, Bruce RJ, Field AS, Peppler WW, Wasmund P, Wendt G. A general framework for monitoring image acquisition workflow in the radiology environment: timeliness for acute stroke CT imaging. J Digit Imaging. 2018;31(2):201–9.
AAPM CT Lexicon Version 1.3. AAPM Web site. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/CTProtocols/documents/CTTerminologyLexicon.pdf Accessed 23rd Jan 2019.
TJC The Joint Commission Diagnostic Imaging Standards. https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/AHC_DiagImagingRpt_MK_20150806.pdf. Retrieved 18th Jan 2019.
Szczykutowicz TP, Pozniak M. A team approach for CT protocol optimization. J Assoc Med Imaging Manag Radiol Manag. 2016. Available at http://www.radiologymanagement-digital.com/radiologymanagement/11122016.
Szczykutowicz TP, Rubert N, Belden D, Ciano A, Duplissis A, Hermanns A, Monette S, JanssenSaldivar E. A wiki based CT protocol management system. Radiol Manage. 2015;(6):25–9.
DICOM. DICOM Supplement 121: CT Protocol Storage. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup121_ft.pdf Accessed 23rd Jan 2019.
Szczykutowicz TP, Rubert N, Belden D, Ciano A, Duplissis A, Hermanns A, Monette S, Saldivar EJ. A wiki-based solution to managing your institution’s imaging protocols. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(7):822–4.
Sachs PB, Hunt K, Mansoubi F, Borgstede J. CT and MR protocol standardization across a large health system: providing a consistent radiologist, patient, and referring provider experience. J Digit Imaging. 2017;30(1):11–6.
Cody DD, Fisher TS, Gress DA, Jr RRL, McNitt-Gray MF, Jr RJP, Fairobent LA. AAPM medical physics practice guideline 1. A: CT protocol management and review practice guideline. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14(5):3–12.
Siegelman JRQW, Gress DA. Radiology stewardship and quality improvement: the process and costs of implementing a CT radiation dose optimization committee in a medium-sized community hospital system. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10(6):416–22.
Kofler JM, Cody DD, Morin RL. CT protocol review and optimization. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11(3):267–70.
Trattner S, Pearson GD, Chin C, Cody DD, Gupta R, Hess CP, et al. Standardization and optimization of CT protocols to achieve low dose. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11(3):271–8.
Szczykutowicz TP, Bour RK, Pozniak M, Ranallo FN. Compliance with AAPM practice Guideline 1. a: CT protocol management and review—from the perspective of a university hospital. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16(2):443–57.
Szczykutowicz TP, Bour RK, Rubert N, Wendt G, Pozniak M, Ranallo FN. CT protocol management: simplifying the process by using a master protocol concept. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015c;16(4):228–43.
Zhang D, Savage CA, Li X, Liu B. Data-driven CT protocol review and management—experience from a large academic hospital. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(3):267–72.
Grimes J, Leng S, Zhang Y, Vrieze T, McCollough C. Implementation and evaluation of a protocol management system for automated review of CT protocols. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(5):523–33.
IHE Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise: Management of Acquisition Protocols (MAP). https://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/Radiology/IHE_RAD_Suppl_MAP.pdf. Retrieved 18th Jan 2019.
Bohl M, Szczykutowicz T. A challenge to radiology and its professional associations: advocate for the implementation of IHE’s management of acquisition protocols (MAP) profile. Published in the Radiology Business Management Association (RBMA) Bulletin November–December 2018.
Szczykutowicz TP, Siegelman J. On the same page—physicist and radiologist perspectives on protocol management and review. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(8):808–14.
Szczykutowicz TP, Malkus A, Ciano A, Pozniak M. Tracking patterns of nonadherence to prescribed CT protocol parameters. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(2):224–30.
Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology. 2010;256(1):32–61.
Kalra MK, Saini S, Rubin GD, editors. MDCT: from protocols to practice. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009. Chapter 2 by KT Bae.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Szczykutowicz, T.P. (2020). CT Practice Management. In: Samei, E., Pelc, N. (eds) Computed Tomography . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26957-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26957-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26956-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26957-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)