Skip to main content

Design and Analysis of a Robotics Day Event to Encourage the Uptake of a Career in STEM Fields to Pre-GCSE Students

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Robotics in Education (RiE 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1023))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper investigates a single day event intended to encourage school students to take up STEM subjects from an early age, in order to access STEM fields later in their educational cycle and thus careers. The event was hosted at Queen’s University Belfast in conjunction with the QUB iAMS group and the IEEE. Teaching theories such as Bloom’s Taxonomy and constructivism, including social constructivism and constructionism, were used to optimize student learning. The students were given a number of tasks based on these theories and asked to rate them at the end. There was an overwhelmingly positive response from most students, both observed and in ratings. For each activity, the more learning theories applied, the better it was rated. Based on the results, the day was branded a success and will no doubt have a positive effect on encouraging pre-GCSE students to take up STEM subjects and fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Engineering UK 2018, Synopsis and Recommendations. EngineeringUK (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amer, A.: Reflections on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 4(1), 213–230 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.C.: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition. Longman, White Plains (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bloom, B.S., et al.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Cognitive Domain, vol. 1, pp. 20–24. McKay, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fosnot, C.T., Perry, R.S.: Constructivism: a psychological theory of learning. Constr. Theory Perspect. Pract. 2, 8–33 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74(1), 59–109 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gamoran, A., Secada, W.G., Marrett, C.B.: The organizational context of teaching and learning. In: Handbook of the Sociology of Education, pp. 37–63. Springer, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greeno, J.G., Collins, A.M., Resnick, L.B., et al.: Cognition and learning. In: Handbook of Educational Psychology, vol. 77, pp. 15–46 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kabátová, M., Pekárová, P.J.: Lessons learned with lego mindstorms: from beginner to teaching robotics. Researchgate 74, 216–222 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khan, Z.: Attitudes Towards Intelligent Service Robots, vol. 17. NADA KTH, Stockholm (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R.B., Doshi, P., Thai, C.N.: Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ stem engagement, learning, and teaching. Comput. Educ. 91, 14–31 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mascolo, M.F., Fischer, K.W.: Constructivist theories. In: Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development, pp. 49–63 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mauch, E.: Using technological innovation to improve the problem-solving skills of middle school students: educators’ experiences with the lego mindstorms robotic invention system. Clearing House 74(4), 211–213 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McKay, M.M., Lowes, S., Tirhali, D., Camins, A.H.: Student learning of stem concepts using a challenge-based robotics curriculum. In: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, pp. 1–25 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, Inc. (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Piaget, J.: The Moral Judgment of the Child. Routledge (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Meter, P., Stevens, R.J.: The role of theory in the study of peer collaboration. J. Exp. Educ. 69(1), 113–127 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vygotsky, L.: Interaction between learning and development. Read. Dev. Child. 23(3), 34–41 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lau, K.W., Tan, H.K., Erwin, B.T., Petrovič, P.: Creative learning in school with LEGO(R) programmable robotics products, vol. 2, pp. 26–31 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shane Trimble , Daniel Brice , Chè Cameron or Michael Cregan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Trimble, S., Brice, D., Cameron, C., Cregan, M. (2020). Design and Analysis of a Robotics Day Event to Encourage the Uptake of a Career in STEM Fields to Pre-GCSE Students. In: Merdan, M., Lepuschitz, W., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1023. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics