Colloquially referred to as Itamaraty, after the palace that has housed the ministry since its inception in the nineteenth century, the Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs began as an institution reserved primarily for the aristocracy. Though still an elite institution, Itamaraty has since become more open and modern, with respected diplomats who are widely regarded as among the most distinguished and effective in the world. Because of its prominence in Brazilian history, Itamaraty traditionally has played a strong role in the making and execution of foreign policy, with relatively little political interference during periods of democratic and authoritarian rule alike. Itamaraty’s distinctive role is beginning to change however, as decision making has become more centralized in the office of the president.


Brazil Itamaraty Diplomacy Diplomats Foreign policy Foreign ministry 



The authors wish to thank the following diplomats and scholars who were consulted in researching and writing this chapter: Larissa Schneider Calza, Jean Karydakis, Franklin Neto, Jose Estanislau do Amaral Souza Neto, Carla Silva-Muhammad, Antonio de Aguiar Patriota, Paulo Sotero, and Chandler Stolp.


  1. Amorim, C. 2014, March 11. Let Us In: Why Barack Obama Must Support Brazil’s Drive for a Permanent Seat on the U.N. Security Council. Foreign Policy, March 11, 2014.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2017. Acting Globally: Memoirs of Brazil’s Assertive Foreign Policy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Batista, D.N. 2010. Habitus diplomático: um estudo do Itamaraty em tempos de regime militar (1964–1985). Federal University of Pernambuco. Accessed February 4, 2019.
  4. ‘Brazil Is Too Important to Stay Out of Global Issues,’ Says Celso Amorim. Instituto Lula. Accessed February 9, 2019.
  5. Burges, S.W., and F.H. Chagas Bastos. 2017. The Importance of Presidential Leadership for Brazilian Foreign Policy. Policy Studies 38 (3): 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Concurso de admissao a carreira diplomatica. 2017. Instituto Rio Banco. Accessed February 11, 2019.
  7. de Faria, C.A.P., D.B. Lopes, and G. Casarões. 2013. Itamaraty on the Move: Institutional and Political Change in Brazilian Foreign Service Under Lula Da Silva’s Presidency (2003–2010). Bulletin of Latin American Research 32 (4): 468–482. Scholar
  8. French Republic. n.d. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Accessed February 11, 2019.
  9. Garcia, E.V., M.C.P. Tusco, and S.E. Moreira Lima, eds. 2017. A Security Council for the 21st Century: Challenges and Prospects. Brasilia: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão.Google Scholar
  10. Garcia-Navarro, L. 2016, September 29. For Affirmative Action, Brazil Sets up Controversial Board to Determine Race. National Public Radio. Accessed February 11, 2019.
  11. Instituto Rio Branco. 2010. The International Forum on Diplomatic Training.
  12. Itamaraty and the Foreign Service Careers. n.d.. Accessed February 11, 2019.
  13. Mallea, R., M. Spektor, and N.J. Wheeler, eds. 2012. The Origins of Nuclear Cooperation: A Critical Oral History Between Argentina and Brazil. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Accessed February 9, 2019.Google Scholar
  14. Milani, C.R.S., and L. Pinheiro. 2017. The Politics of Brazilian Foreign Policy and Its Analytical Challenges. Foreign Policy Analysis (2017): 278–296.Google Scholar
  15. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. n.d. Itamaraty. Accessed February 11, 2019.
  16. de Oliveira, C. 2017, April 5. Brazil’s New Problem with Blackness. Foreign Policy. Accessed February 11, 2019.
  17. Open or Closed? The Contradictions of Brazil’s New Foreign Policy. 2019, January 12. The Economist, 30.Google Scholar
  18. Parecer preliminar: Projeto de lei orcamentaria para 2015 (Preliminary opinion: Draft budget law for 2015). 2014. Congreso Nacional, Comissão Mista de Planos, Orcamentos Publicos e Fiscalizacao. Accessed February 11, 2019.
  19. Pimentel, J.V.S., ed. 2016. Brazilian Diplomatic Thought—Policymakers and Agents of Foreign Policy (1750–1964). Brasilia: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão.Google Scholar
  20. Post, F. 2018, October 24. CIEX: Itamaraty and the Military Dictatorship. Revista Opera. Accessed February 4, 2019.
  21. Stuenkel, O. 2014, December 12. Brazilian Foreign Policy: Into the Dark. Post-Western World.
  22. ———. 2015. The BRICS and the Future of Global Order. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2017, May 1. The Domestic Politics of Brazilian Foreign Policy. Post-Western World. Accessed February 3, 2019.
  24. Stuenkel, O., and M.M. Taylor. 2015. Brazil on the Global Stage: Origins and Consequences of Brazil’s Challenge to the Global Liberal Order. In Brazil on the Global Stage: Power, Ideas, and the Liberal International Order, ed. O. Stuenkel and M.M. Taylor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Telles, E.E. 2014. Another America: The Significance of Skin Color in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. The Wholesale Attack on Brazilian Sovereignty: An Interview with Former Foreign Minister Celso Amorim. 2018, May 23. Truthdig. Accessed February 3, 2019.
  27. Tickner, A.B. 2012. Rising Brazil and South America. In Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases, ed. S. Smith, A. Hadfield, and T. Dunne, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.2018 Master of Arts Degree, Global Policy StudiesThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.2017 Master of Arts Degree, Global Policy Studies, and 2015 Master of Arts Degree, Russian, East European, and Eurasian StudiesThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  3. 3.Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public AffairsThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations