Skip to main content

Abstract

A breast cancer diagnosis is established using the triple assessment approach (‘triple test’). This comprises the clinical, imaging and pathological assessment of a breast lesion. Not all components of the triple test are necessarily required to establish a benign diagnosis. Mammography and ultrasonography are the most frequently used methods of assessing palpable breast lesions, and mammography is widely used for breast cancer screening before a palpable mass develops. Significant findings that can be identified on imaging include a mass lesion (regular, irregular or spiculated), a non-specific or asymmetric density, an architectural disturbance and microcalcifications. The final component within the ‘triple assessment approach’ is cytopathological or histopathological correlation. The goal of biopsy is to obtain sufficient material using the least invasive approach to obtain a diagnosis. In all cases, correlation of the FNAB and/or CNB results with the clinical and imaging findings is essential for accurate diagnosis. With appropriate use of the triple test, it should be possible to obtain a definitive diagnosis in almost all cases. Optimal management of breast cancer patients requires a multidisciplinary approach.

The following chapter discusses the IAC Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy management protocols associated with the five categories and their risk of malignancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225(1):165–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelsoon EB, et al. ACR BI-RADS atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. 5th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, et al. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(1):35–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(2):75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Menezes GLG, Knuttel FM, Stehouwer BL, Pijnappel RM, van den Bosch MAAJ. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: a literature review and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5:61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibbons CE, Quinn CM, Gibbons D. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy management of the axilla in primary breast carcinoma. Acta Cytol. 2019;63:314–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. National Breast Cancer Centre. Multidisciplinary meetings for cancer care: a guide for health service providers. Camperdown: National Breast Cancer Centre; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Treatment of primary breast cancer. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, et al. American Joint Committee in Cancer. Breast. In: AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Non-operative Diagnosis Working Group of the UK National Coordinating Committee for Breast Pathology. Guidelines for non-operative diagnostic procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening. UK National Health Service Breast Screening Program (NHBSP) and The Royal College of Pathologists. February 2017. Publication number G150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew S. Field .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cohen-Hallaleh, R. et al. (2020). Clinical Management. In: Field, A.S., Raymond, W.A., Schmitt, F. (eds) The International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26883-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26883-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26882-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26883-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics