Abstract
Despite growing realization around the central role of cultural beliefs in restricting pedagogical change in India, there remains little clarity on how to address such beliefs among Indian teachers. This chapter presents a rationale and framework for engaging with teachers’ beliefs within Indian teacher education. It draws from a review of global research and a few Indian teacher education programs that have attempted to engage with teachers’ beliefs. It proposes a theoretically ground yet practice-oriented framework that weaves insights from two approaches used in Western contexts for bringing change in adult learners’ beliefs and practice, but rarely before applied to Indian teacher education: Transformative Learning and Freirean problem-posing. Building commitment to learner-centered beliefs could be one way of developing Indian teachers as professionals and intellectuals able to determine the most effective context-specific practices best suited for helping all their learners succeed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
‘Learner-centered’ pedagogy is being defined here as an approach that values every learner’s background, capacities, interests, and active participation, and designs learning experiences around these to engage learners in discovering new knowledge for themselves, in contrast to more teacher-centered knowledge-transmission approaches. The author’s understanding could be more aptly termed ‘learning-centered’ education, which is similar to the understanding contained in literature on learner-centered education (see Schweisfurth, 2013) and in India’s own educational policy frameworks (see NCF, 2005), but implies a greater focus on the underlying beliefs driving this approach than on the specific practices used, which may vary in different contexts (see Brinkmann, 2018).
- 2.
The terms ‘teacher training’ and ‘teacher education’ are used interchangeably in this chapter, as in Indian education reforms, although there is an implicit difference between them. As suggested by Peters (1967), training usually implies the acquisition of a skill through some amount of drill, without necessarily developing a deeper understanding of the underlying cognitive principles involved—as involved in the educational process. Moreover, the chapter focuses predominantly on in-service TE, although insights from the proposed framework could equally be applied to preservice TE.
- 3.
This chapter focuses on teachers in the government sector, which caters to nearly two-thirds of children enrolled in elementary schools—primarily from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (NUEPA, 2015).
- 4.
An ideology is a set of beliefs that supports the dominance of certain groups in a society and the oppression of others, which may become internalized as natural, taken-for-granted, common-sense wisdom—a process Gramsci (1971) called ‘hegemony’.
- 5.
- 6.
Such as equality, knowledge construction, a sense of mission, and other beliefs listed in Table 12.1.
References
Ashton, P., & Gregoire-Gill, M. (2003). At the heart of teaching: The role of emotion in changing teachers’ beliefs. In J. Raths & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp. 99–122). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Asian Development Bank. (2017). Innovative strategies for accelerated human resource development in South Asia: Teacher professional development. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
Batra, P. (2005). Voice and agency of teachers: A missing link in the National Curriculum Framework. Economic and Political Weekly,40(36), 4347–4356.
Batra, P. (2006, May). Locating the agency of teachers in a changing Indian educational context. Paper presented at the Conference on Preparing Teachers for a Changing Context, Institute of Education, London.
Batra, S. (2009). Inequities in elementary education. In P. Rustagi (Ed.), Concerns, conflicts and cohesions: Universalization of elementary education in India (pp. 102–124). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Batra, P. (2013). Teacher education and classroom practice in India: A critique and propositions. In S. Chunawala & M. Kharatmal (Eds.), The epiSTEME reviews (Vol. 4): Research trends in science, technology and mathematics education (pp. 159–186). New Delhi: Narosa. Retrieved from http://episteme4.hbcse.tifr.res.in/review-volume/.
Bhattacharjea, S., Wadhwa, W., & Banerjee, R. (2011). Inside primary schools: A study of teaching and learning in rural India. New Delhi: ASER.
Brinkmann, S. (2016). The role of teachers’ beliefs in the implementation of learner-centered education in India (PhD thesis). London: UCL Institute of Education.
Brinkmann, S. (2017). Improving education quality in South Asia: A review of UNICEF’s efforts. Kathmandu: UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia.
Brinkmann, S. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs and educational reform in India: From ‘learner-centered’ to ‘learning-centered’ education. Comparative Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2018.1541661.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brookfield, S. (2001). Repositioning ideology critique in a critical theory of adult learning. Adult Education Quarterly,52, 7–22.
Brookfield, S. (2006). Developing critical thinkers [Course reader, 13 and 14th September]. New York: Teachers’ College, Columbia University.
Brown, K. M. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly,40(1), 77–108.
Cantu, D. A. (2001). An investigation of the relationship between social studies teachers’ beliefs and practice. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.
Clarke, P. (2001). Teaching and learning: The culture of pedagogy. New Delhi: Sage.
Cranton, P. (2002). Teaching for transformation. In J. M. Ross-Gordon (Ed.), Contemporary viewpoints on teaching adults effectively: New directions for adult and continuing education (pp. 63–71). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Cranton, P. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Curry-Stevens, A. (2007). New forms of transformative education: Pedagogy for the privileged. Journal of Transformative Education,5, 33.
Deshkal Society. (2010). Report on inclusive classroom, social inclusion/exclusion and diversity: Perspectives, policies and practices. New Delhi: Deshkal Publication. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/india/13.__National_Report_on_Inclusive_Classroom.pdf.
Dirkx, J. M. (1998). Transformative learning theory in the practice of adult education: An overview. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning,7, 1–14.
Dyer, C. (2004). District institutes of education and training: A comparative study in three Indian states (Researching the Issues’ Series, No. 55). London: Department for International Development.
Dyson, M. (2010). What might a person-centered model of teacher education look like in the 21st century? The transformism model of teacher education. Journal of Transformative Education,8(1), 3–21.
Freire, P. (1970 [2000]). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
Freire, P. (1998). Teachers as cultural workers. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Fullan, M. (1985). Change processes and strategies at the local level. Elementary School Journal,85, 391–421.
Gardner, H. (2006). Changing minds: The art and science of changing our own and other people’s minds. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Government of India. (2010). Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan 11th Joint Review Mission & mid-term review—Aide Memoire. New Delhi: MHRD. Retrieved from http://14.139.60.153/bitstream/123456789/1459/1/SARVA%20SHIKSHA%20ABHIYAN-%20ELEVENTH%20JOINT%20REVIEW%20MISSION%20%26MID%20TERM%20REVIEW%2015TH%20TO%2029TH%20JANUARY%2C%202010.%20AIDE%20MEMOIRE.pdf.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. In Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith (Eds.). New York: International Publishers.
Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher,15(5), 5–12.
Jackson, M. G. (2008). Transformative learning for a new worldview: Learning to think differently. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jha, J., & Jhingran, D. (2005). Elementary education for the poorest and other deprived groups: The real challenge of universalization. New Delhi: Manohar.
King, K. P. (2005). Bringing transformative learning to life. Malabar, FL: Kreiger.
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education,20, 77–97.
Kumar, K. (2008). A pedagogue’s romance. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Lundeberd, M. A., & Levin, B. B. (2003). Prompting the development of pre-service teachers’ beliefs through cases, action research, problem-based learning, and technology. In J. Raths & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp. 23–42). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Mehrotra, S. (2006). Reforming elementary education in India: A menu of options. International Journal of Educational Development,26(3), 261–277.
Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
NCF. (2005). National Curriculum Framework 2005. New Delhi: NCERT.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies,19(4), 317–328.
NUEPA. (2015). DISE 2010–11 Flash Statistics. New Delhi: NUEPA.
OPEPA. (1997). Final report of the workshop on training on attitudinal issues of tribal area teachers [Unpublished report]. Bhubaneswar: Orissa Primary Education Programme Authority.
Pajares, F. M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research,62(3), 307–322.
Peters, R. S. (1967). What is an educational process? In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The concept of education (pp. 1–23). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ramachandran, V. (1998). Engendering development: Lessons from the social sector programmes in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies,5(1), 49–63.
Ramachandran, V. (2005). Why school teachers are demotivated and disheartened. Economic and Political Weekly,40(21), 2141–2144.
Ramachandran, V., Bhattarcharjea, S. & Sheshagiri, K. M. (2008). Primary school teachers: The twists and turns of everyday practice. New Delhi: Educational Resource Unit. Retrieved from http://www.eruindia.org/files/Teacher%20booklet%20edited%20final%2028%20Oct%2008.pdf.
Rao, N., Cheng, K., & Narain, K. (2003). Primary schooling in China and India: Understanding how socio-contextual factors moderate the role of the state. International Review of Education,49(1/2), 153–176.
Raths, J. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and teaching beliefs. Early Childhood Research and Practice,3(1), 1–10.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York: McMillan.
Roberts, P. (2000). Education, literacy and humanization: Exploring the work of Paulo Freire. London: Bergin & Garvey.
Sanger, M. N., & Osguthorpe, R. D. (2011). Teacher education, preservice teacher beliefs, and the moral work of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education,27(3), 569–578.
Sarangapani, P. M. (2003). Constructing school knowledge: An ethnography of learning in an Indian village. New Delhi: Sage.
Schweisfurth, M. (2013). Learner-centered education in international perspective: Whose pedagogy for whose development? London: Routledge.
Singh, S. K. (2006). Impact of in-service training of teachers: The experience of BEP (DPEP III). Patna: UNICEF.
Stuart, C., & Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: Pre-service teachers’ experiences, beliefs, and classroom practices. Journal of Teacher Education,51(2), 113–121.
Taylor, E. W. (Ed.). (2006). Teaching for change (New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 109). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Taylor, E. W. (2009). Fostering transformative learning. In J. Mezirow & E. W. Taylor (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp. 3–17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tillema, H. H. (1997). Stability and change in student teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Teacher Education,20(3), 209–212.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brinkmann, S. (2019). Transformative Problem-Posing Teacher Education: A Framework for Engaging with Teachers’ Beliefs Through Teacher Education in India. In: Setty, R., Iyengar, R., Witenstein, M.A., Byker, E.J., Kidwai, H. (eds) Teaching and Teacher Education. South Asian Education Policy, Research, and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26879-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26879-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26878-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26879-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)