Skip to main content

Transformative Problem-Posing Teacher Education: A Framework for Engaging with Teachers’ Beliefs Through Teacher Education in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching and Teacher Education

Part of the book series: South Asian Education Policy, Research, and Practice ((SAEPRP))

Abstract

Despite growing realization around the central role of cultural beliefs in restricting pedagogical change in India, there remains little clarity on how to address such beliefs among Indian teachers. This chapter presents a rationale and framework for engaging with teachers’ beliefs within Indian teacher education. It draws from a review of global research and a few Indian teacher education programs that have attempted to engage with teachers’ beliefs. It proposes a theoretically ground yet practice-oriented framework that weaves insights from two approaches used in Western contexts for bringing change in adult learners’ beliefs and practice, but rarely before applied to Indian teacher education: Transformative Learning and Freirean problem-posing. Building commitment to learner-centered beliefs could be one way of developing Indian teachers as professionals and intellectuals able to determine the most effective context-specific practices best suited for helping all their learners succeed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Learner-centered’ pedagogy is being defined here as an approach that values every learner’s background, capacities, interests, and active participation, and designs learning experiences around these to engage learners in discovering new knowledge for themselves, in contrast to more teacher-centered knowledge-transmission approaches. The author’s understanding could be more aptly termed ‘learning-centered’ education, which is similar to the understanding contained in literature on learner-centered education (see Schweisfurth, 2013) and in India’s own educational policy frameworks (see NCF, 2005), but implies a greater focus on the underlying beliefs driving this approach than on the specific practices used, which may vary in different contexts (see Brinkmann, 2018).

  2. 2.

    The terms ‘teacher training’ and ‘teacher education’ are used interchangeably in this chapter, as in Indian education reforms, although there is an implicit difference between them. As suggested by Peters (1967), training usually implies the acquisition of a skill through some amount of drill, without necessarily developing a deeper understanding of the underlying cognitive principles involved—as involved in the educational process. Moreover, the chapter focuses predominantly on in-service TE, although insights from the proposed framework could equally be applied to preservice TE.

  3. 3.

    This chapter focuses on teachers in the government sector, which caters to nearly two-thirds of children enrolled in elementary schools—primarily from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (NUEPA, 2015).

  4. 4.

    An ideology is a set of beliefs that supports the dominance of certain groups in a society and the oppression of others, which may become internalized as natural, taken-for-granted, common-sense wisdom—a process Gramsci (1971) called ‘hegemony’.

  5. 5.

    I found very few examples of frameworks that explicitly blend Transformative Learning with Freirean Problem-Posing (e.g. Brookfield, 2001; Brown, 2004; Curry-Stevens, 2007), even fewer applied specifically to TE, and none within an Indian context.

  6. 6.

    Such as equality, knowledge construction, a sense of mission, and other beliefs listed in Table 12.1.

References

  • Ashton, P., & Gregoire-Gill, M. (2003). At the heart of teaching: The role of emotion in changing teachers’ beliefs. In J. Raths & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp. 99–122). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank. (2017). Innovative strategies for accelerated human resource development in South Asia: Teacher professional development. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, P. (2005). Voice and agency of teachers: A missing link in the National Curriculum Framework. Economic and Political Weekly,40(36), 4347–4356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, P. (2006, May). Locating the agency of teachers in a changing Indian educational context. Paper presented at the Conference on Preparing Teachers for a Changing Context, Institute of Education, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, S. (2009). Inequities in elementary education. In P. Rustagi (Ed.), Concerns, conflicts and cohesions: Universalization of elementary education in India (pp. 102–124). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, P. (2013). Teacher education and classroom practice in India: A critique and propositions. In S. Chunawala & M. Kharatmal (Eds.), The epiSTEME reviews (Vol. 4): Research trends in science, technology and mathematics education (pp. 159–186). New Delhi: Narosa. Retrieved from http://episteme4.hbcse.tifr.res.in/review-volume/.

  • Bhattacharjea, S., Wadhwa, W., & Banerjee, R. (2011). Inside primary schools: A study of teaching and learning in rural India. New Delhi: ASER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2016). The role of teachers’ beliefs in the implementation of learner-centered education in India (PhD thesis). London: UCL Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2017). Improving education quality in South Asia: A review of UNICEF’s efforts. Kathmandu: UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs and educational reform in India: From ‘learner-centered’ to ‘learning-centered’ education. Comparative Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2018.1541661.

  • Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2001). Repositioning ideology critique in a critical theory of adult learning. Adult Education Quarterly,52, 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2006). Developing critical thinkers [Course reader, 13 and 14th September]. New York: Teachers’ College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. M. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly,40(1), 77–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantu, D. A. (2001). An investigation of the relationship between social studies teachers’ beliefs and practice. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. (2001). Teaching and learning: The culture of pedagogy. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P. (2002). Teaching for transformation. In J. M. Ross-Gordon (Ed.), Contemporary viewpoints on teaching adults effectively: New directions for adult and continuing education (pp. 63–71). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry-Stevens, A. (2007). New forms of transformative education: Pedagogy for the privileged. Journal of Transformative Education,5, 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshkal Society. (2010). Report on inclusive classroom, social inclusion/exclusion and diversity: Perspectives, policies and practices. New Delhi: Deshkal Publication. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/india/13.__National_Report_on_Inclusive_Classroom.pdf.

  • Dirkx, J. M. (1998). Transformative learning theory in the practice of adult education: An overview. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning,7, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, C. (2004). District institutes of education and training: A comparative study in three Indian states (Researching the Issues’ Series, No. 55). London: Department for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, M. (2010). What might a person-centered model of teacher education look like in the 21st century? The transformism model of teacher education. Journal of Transformative Education,8(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970 [2000]). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1998). Teachers as cultural workers. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1985). Change processes and strategies at the local level. Elementary School Journal,85, 391–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2006). Changing minds: The art and science of changing our own and other people’s minds. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2010). Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan 11th Joint Review Mission & mid-term review—Aide Memoire. New Delhi: MHRD. Retrieved from http://14.139.60.153/bitstream/123456789/1459/1/SARVA%20SHIKSHA%20ABHIYAN-%20ELEVENTH%20JOINT%20REVIEW%20MISSION%20%26MID%20TERM%20REVIEW%2015TH%20TO%2029TH%20JANUARY%2C%202010.%20AIDE%20MEMOIRE.pdf.

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. In Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith (Eds.). New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher,15(5), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. G. (2008). Transformative learning for a new worldview: Learning to think differently. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, J., & Jhingran, D. (2005). Elementary education for the poorest and other deprived groups: The real challenge of universalization. New Delhi: Manohar.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, K. P. (2005). Bringing transformative learning to life. Malabar, FL: Kreiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education,20, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (2008). A pedagogue’s romance. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundeberd, M. A., & Levin, B. B. (2003). Prompting the development of pre-service teachers’ beliefs through cases, action research, problem-based learning, and technology. In J. Raths & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp. 23–42). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, S. (2006). Reforming elementary education in India: A menu of options. International Journal of Educational Development,26(3), 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCF. (2005). National Curriculum Framework 2005. New Delhi: NCERT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies,19(4), 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NUEPA. (2015). DISE 2010–11 Flash Statistics. New Delhi: NUEPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • OPEPA. (1997). Final report of the workshop on training on attitudinal issues of tribal area teachers [Unpublished report]. Bhubaneswar: Orissa Primary Education Programme Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research,62(3), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. S. (1967). What is an educational process? In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The concept of education (pp. 1–23). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. (1998). Engendering development: Lessons from the social sector programmes in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies,5(1), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. (2005). Why school teachers are demotivated and disheartened. Economic and Political Weekly,40(21), 2141–2144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V., Bhattarcharjea, S. & Sheshagiri, K. M. (2008). Primary school teachers: The twists and turns of everyday practice. New Delhi: Educational Resource Unit. Retrieved from http://www.eruindia.org/files/Teacher%20booklet%20edited%20final%2028%20Oct%2008.pdf.

  • Rao, N., Cheng, K., & Narain, K. (2003). Primary schooling in China and India: Understanding how socio-contextual factors moderate the role of the state. International Review of Education,49(1/2), 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raths, J. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and teaching beliefs. Early Childhood Research and Practice,3(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2000). Education, literacy and humanization: Exploring the work of Paulo Freire. London: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, M. N., & Osguthorpe, R. D. (2011). Teacher education, preservice teacher beliefs, and the moral work of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education,27(3), 569–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarangapani, P. M. (2003). Constructing school knowledge: An ethnography of learning in an Indian village. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth, M. (2013). Learner-centered education in international perspective: Whose pedagogy for whose development? London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. K. (2006). Impact of in-service training of teachers: The experience of BEP (DPEP III). Patna: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, C., & Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: Pre-service teachers’ experiences, beliefs, and classroom practices. Journal of Teacher Education,51(2), 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. W. (Ed.). (2006). Teaching for change (New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 109). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. W. (2009). Fostering transformative learning. In J. Mezirow & E. W. Taylor (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp. 3–17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, H. H. (1997). Stability and change in student teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Teacher Education,20(3), 209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brinkmann, S. (2019). Transformative Problem-Posing Teacher Education: A Framework for Engaging with Teachers’ Beliefs Through Teacher Education in India. In: Setty, R., Iyengar, R., Witenstein, M.A., Byker, E.J., Kidwai, H. (eds) Teaching and Teacher Education. South Asian Education Policy, Research, and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26879-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26879-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26878-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26879-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics