Abstract
Approximately 2000 secondary school teachers, many for the first time, experienced participating in a technology-enabled, practice-based, blended learning teacher professional development programme. A majority of the teachers work in schools situated in rural and remote locations, teaching students from socio-economically marginalised backgrounds. Thus far, the programme has enabled university-school linkages through the formation of teacher communities of practice and through certification courses. This chapter explores the teachers’ voices, experiences and changes in beliefs and practices through participating in the continuous professional development programme implemented at scale in the Indian context to evaluate the processes and argues that the integration of academic, administrative and policy goals at every level of the intervention is vital for sustaining teacher professional development quality at scale.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For more detailed information about CLIx, please visit https://clix.tiss.edu/.
- 2.
Fourteen modules have been developed in communicative English, mathematics and science for secondary school students as Open Educational Resources. The modules are (1) Digital Literacy—Invitation to CLIx, (2) English Beginner, (3) English Elementary, (4) Geometric Reasoning—Part I, (5) Geometric Reasoning Part II, (6) Proportional Reasoning, (7) Linear Equations, (8) Atomic Structure, (9) Basic Astronomy, (10) Ecosystem, (11) Health and Disease, (12) Sound, (13) Understanding Motion, and (14) Reflecting on Values. Each of the modules are divided into units and further divided into lessons. The lessons have a variety of activities for students that are classroom, technology-enabled and hands-on with different levels of facilitation required by teachers. The modules are accessed in schools via the CLIx learning platform specifically designed to work offline, providing a connected learning experience through local area network.
- 3.
The CLIx programme is being implemented in four Indian states namely, Chhattisgarh (CG), Mizoram (MZ), Rajasthan (RJ), and Telangana (TS).
- 4.
Typically, teachers implemented 2 or 3 lessons in the first unit of the digital literacy, English and mathematics CLIx student modules.
- 5.
C01—Introduction to ICT in Education; S01—Communicative English Language Teaching; S02—Reflective Mathematics Teaching; S03—Interactive Science Teaching.
- 6.
Content—comments related to workshop session content and the CLIx student modules.
Pedagogy—comments related to workshop facilitation and duration, CLIx pedagogic pillars.
Implementation/technology—comments related to implementation, infrastructure, technology issues experienced in the workshop.
Systemic/career—comments related to administrative, career and systemic issues raised by teachers.
- 7.
The level of understanding of English, mathematics and science among a majority of the students does not match their grade level. The CLIx student modules have been designed to build conceptual understanding from the basics to the grade nine level.
- 8.
During field visits through the Digital Classroom Programme of the states, students were seen sitting in front of a television or projector screen and watching pre-recorded lessons by expert teachers of the state. Students looked disconnected and bored as there was minimal interaction. However, many of the teachers were excited about the programme.
- 9.
An internal study of education technology programmes conducted in 2015 to review the landscape of ed-tech programmes in India.
References
Albion, P. R., Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Peeraer, J. (2015). Teachers’ professional development for ICT integration: Towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice. Education and Information Technologies,20(4), 655–673.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Batra, P. (2012). Positioning teachers in the emerging education landscape of contemporary India (India Infrastructure Report 2012). Retrieved from http://www.idfc.com/pdf/report/2012/Chapter_20.pdf.
Chandran, M., & Roy, A. (2017). In-service teacher education and ICT. Review of CLIx baseline data from four states (Unpublished working paper). Retrieved from https://clix.tiss.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/WorkingPaper_TeachersICT_Final.docx.pdf.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education,24, 249–305.
Connected Learning Initiative (CLIx). (2017). CLIx internal documents (Unpublished reports, meeting notes, brochures and other material related to the programme).
CLIx. (2018). Post graduate course in Reflective Teaching with ICT.S02 reflective mathematics teaching. Teacher Coursebook. Retrieved from https://clix.tiss.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Math-English-Coursebook.pdf.
Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). Professionalism, performativity and empowerment: Discourses in the politics, policies and purposes of continuing professional development. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 3–32). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education: The kappa Delta Pi lecture series. New York, NY: Touchstone.
GoI. (2009, August 27). Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. Gazette of India.
Korthagen, A. J., & Kessels, J. P. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher,28(4), 4–17.
Korthagen, A. J. (2010). Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behavior and teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education,26, 98–106.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT). (2005). National Curriculum Framework 2005. New Delhi: NCERT.
National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE). (2009). National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education: Towards preparing professional and humane teacher. New Delhi: National Council for Teacher Education.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Ramanathan, A. (2018, December 20). A year’s end, A journey begun (03.12.18—04.12.18). Retrieved from https://clix.tiss.edu/a-years-end-a-journey-begun-03-12-18-04-12-18/.
Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching,22(4), 413–425.
Sarangapani, P. M. (2004). Universities: The invisible dimensions of elementary education. In K. Chanana (Ed.), Transforming links between higher and basic education. Mapping the field (pp. 95–107). New Delhi, India: Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd.
Sarangapani, P. M. (2011). Soft disciplines and hard battles. Contemporary Education Dialogue,8(1), 67–84.
Sarangapani, P. M., Mukhopadhyay, R., Jain, P., & Jain, M. (2018). Recovering the practice and profession of teaching. In M. Jain, A. Mehendale, R. Mukhopadhyay, P. M. Sarangapani, & C. Winch (Eds.), School education in India: Market, state and quality (pp. 123–128). Abingdon: Routledge.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Setty, R. (2016). Intellectualising teachers’ education: A study of practice-based teacher education. In D. Nawani (Ed.), Teaching-learning resources for school education (pp. 368–384). New Delhi, India: Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher,15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Thirumalai, B. (2017). A study of teacher communities of practice in the Indian context. (Unpublished PhD thesis proposal).
Thirumalai, B. (2019, January 11). Teachers’ communities of practice (04.12.2018–05.12.2018). Retrieved from https://clix.tiss.edu/teachers-communities-of-practice-04-12-2018-05-12-2018/.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winch, C. (2004). What do teachers need to know about teaching? A critical examination of the occupational knowledge of teachers. British Journal of Educational Studies,52(2), 180–196.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thirumalai, B., Ramanathan, A., Charania, A., Stump, G. (2019). Designing for Technology-Enabled Reflective Practice: Teachers’ Voices on Participating in a Connected Learning Practice. In: Setty, R., Iyengar, R., Witenstein, M.A., Byker, E.J., Kidwai, H. (eds) Teaching and Teacher Education. South Asian Education Policy, Research, and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26879-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26879-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26878-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26879-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)