Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Research in Fisheries

Part of the book series: MARE Publication Series ((MARE,volume 22))

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the arguments and discusses the results of the GAP project in the context of the ongoing reform in fisheries governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S (eds) (2019) Transdisciplinarity for small-scale fisheries governance: analysis and practice. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois M, Hadjimichael M, Raakjær J (2016) The rise of the scientific fisherman: Mobilising knowledge and negotiating user rights in the Devon inshore brown crab fishery, UK. Marine Pol 65:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasen SQ, Hegland TJ, Raakjær J (2015) Decentralising: The implementation of regionalisation and co-management under the post-2013 Common Fisheries Policy. Marine Pol 62:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU (2019) Responsible research and innovation, H2020 programme. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation

  • FAO (2001–2019). Fisheries and Aquaculture topics. Fisheries and aquaculture governance. Topics Fact Sheets. In FAO fisheries and aquaculture department [online]. Rome. Updated 7 January 2016. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fishery/governance/en and http://www.fao.org/fishery/topic/16034/en

  • GAP (2015a) Policy briefing 4: GAP2 international symposium. Retrieved from (http://gap2.eu/gap2general/gap2-international-symposium-post-event-brief/)

  • GAP (2015b) Policy briefing 5: building bridges through participation – concrete outcomes & cementing change. Retrieved from (http://gap2.eu/news/policy-briefing-5-building-bridges-through-participation-concrete-outcomes-cementing-change/)

  • GAP (2015c) Participatory research toolbox. Retrieved from (http://gap2.eu/methodological-toolbox/)

  • Griffin L (2013) Good governance, scale and power: a case study of North Sea fisheries. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm P, Soma K (2016) Fishers’ information in governance: A matter of trust. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 18:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linke S, Jentoft S (2016) Ideals, realities and paradoxes of stakeholder participation in EU fisheries governance. Environ Sociol 2(2):144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinson S, Middleton D (2018) Evolving the ecosystem approach in European fisheries: Transferable lessons from New Zealand’s experience in strengthening stakeholder involvement. Mar Pol 90:194–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinson S, Wilson DCK (2014) Building bridges among scientists and fishermen with participatory action research. In: Urquhart J, Acott T, Symens D, Zhao M (eds) Social issues in sustainable marine fisheries management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 121–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinson S, Wilson DC, Galiay P, Deas P (2011) Engaging stakeholders in marine research. Mar Policy 35:18–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinson S, Mangi S, Hetherington S, Catchpole T, Masters J (2017) Guidelines for Industry-Science Data Collection: step-by-step guidance to gathering useful and useable scientific information. Fishing into the Future report to Seafish. 65p. June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangi S, Kupschus S, Mackinson S, Rodmell D, Lee A, Bourke E, Rossiter T, Masters J, Hetherington S, Catchpole T, Righton D (2018) Progress in designing and delivering effective fishing industry-science data collection in the UK. Fish Fish, Wiley 2018:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pastoors MA, Quirijns FJ (2017) PFA Self-sampling report 2015–2016. PFA report 017/02, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwach V, Bailly D, Christensen AS, Delaney AE, Degnbol P, van Densen WL, Holm P, McLay HA, Nolde Nielsen K, Pastoors MA, Reeves SA, Wilson DC (2007) Policy and knowledge in fisheries management: a policy brief. ICES J Mar Sci 64(4):789–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DC (2009) The paradoxes of transparency: science and the ecosystem approach to fisheries management in Europe. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Mackinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Crown

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mackinson, S., Holm, P., Hadjimichael, M. (2020). Conclusion. In: Holm, P., Hadjimichael, M., Linke, S., Mackinson, S. (eds) Collaborative Research in Fisheries. MARE Publication Series, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26784-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26784-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26783-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26784-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics