Abstract
The historical-philosophical foundations underlying contemporary psychological theoretical-methodological assumptions is grounded on the articulation of a double pronged point of view about psychology as a modern science: the genesis of novel human sociocultural experiences and the genesis of psychological ideas about these experiences. A combined analysis of historical-cultural and philosophical views is relevant considering that psychological theories and methods cannot be automatically applied to empirical facts or data. A fact only exists within a conceptual framework, they are produced or constructed by the researcher, who belongs to a specific scientific community. Psychological theories and systems come from a two-fold concern of the empirical sciences, swinging between general laws to specific events. A task for the contemporary psychologies consists in gradually including new experiences in their conceptual developments. However, which type of psychology could be consistent in the contemporary society, where populations with distinct ways of life coexist? A possible answer can be achieved from an ethical standpoint that includes new subjects, their words and thought systems, in theory and method construction. New paths of subjectivation coexist with the fissured ethos of modernity and the different traditions worldwide are not late versions of closed, pre-modern societies, destined to fade away or integrate into the modern project. This apparently obvious assertion may open space for new psychological reflections and a complexification of the field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The project has been supported by University of Sao Paulo scholarship program (Programa Unificado de Bolsas, 2014–2015).
References
Almeida, M. R. C. (2012). Os índios na história do Brasil no século XIX: da invisibilidade ao protagonismo. Revista História Hoje, 1(2), 21–40.
Althusser, L. (1969/1980). Ideologia e aparelhos ideológicos do estado. São Paulo: Editorial Presença and Martins Fontes. (Originalmente publicado em 1969).
Áries, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Boesch, E. E. (1997). Reasons for a Symbolic concept of action. Culture & Psychology, 3(3), 423–431.
Encontro Nacional dos Estudantes Indígenas. (2013). Documento final do I Encontro Nacional dos Estudantes Indígenas. São Carlos: UFSCAR.
Fernandes. (2007). Ensino superior para indígenas: desafios e perspectivas. Trabalho apresentado no Seminário Formação Jurídica e Povos Indígenas Desafios para uma educação superior, ocorrido entre os dias 21 e 23 de março, em Belém, Pará.
Fernando, M. (2010). Mariano Fernando. Conselho Regional de Psicologia da 6a Região (Ed), Psicologia e povos indígenas. (pp. 46–49). São Paulo: CRPSP.
Figueiredo, L. C. M. (2007). A invenção do psicológico: quatro séculos de subjetivação 1500–1900 (p. 184). São Paulo: Escuta. (Trabalho original publicado em 1992).
Figueiredo, L. C. M. (2009). Matrizes do pensamento psicológico (p. 208). Petropólis: Vozes. (Trabalho original publicado em 1989).
Figueiredo, L. C. M. (2013). Revisitando as psicologias: da epistemologia à ética das práticas e discursos psicológicos (p. 183). Petropólis: Vozes. (Trabalho original publicado em 1996).
Gadamer, H.-G. (2010a). Mito e Razão. In H.-G. Gadamer (Ed.), Hermenêutica da Obra de Arte. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. (Texto original publicado em 1954.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2010b). Mito e Logos. In H.-G. Gadamer (Ed.), Hermenêutica da Obra de Arte (pp. 65–68). São Paulo: Martins Fontes. (Texto original publicado em 1981).
Guimarães, D. S. (2017). Dialogical mutiplication: essays on cultural psychology (Tese de Livre-Docência). Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
Guimarães, D. S. & Benedito, M. A. (2018) The Construction of the person in the interethnic situation: Dialogues with indigenous university students. In: A. Rosa; J. Valsiner. (Orgs.). The cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 575–596). (1sted.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingold, T. (2004). Beyond biology and culture. The meaning of evolution in a relational world. Social Anthropology, 12(2), 209–221.
Monteiro, J. M. (1994). Negros da terra: índios e bandeirantes nas origens de São Paulo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Moura, M. L. & Guimarães, D. S. (2013) Commentary. Social reproduction and its transformations: Relationships in educational institutions. In: Y. Omi; L. P. Rodriguez; M. C. Peralta-Gomez. (Org.). Lives and relationships: Culture in transitions between social roles (pp. 19–94). (1sted.). Charlotte: Information Age Pub Inc.
Patto, M. H. S. (2008). A Produção Do Fracasso Escolar [The production of scholar failure]. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo. (Texto original publicado em 1990).
Rezende Junior, J. (2017). O Problema da Experiência na Disputa sobre o Método Científico: Dilthey, Windelband E Rickert. Conjectura: Filosofia e Educação, 22(1), 136–160.
Stengers, I. (2002). A invenção das ciências modernas. São Paulo: Editora 34. (Texto original publicado em 1993).
UFRGS (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul). (2013). Estudantes indígenas no ensino superior: Uma abordagem a partir da experiência na UFRGS. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS.
Valsiner, J. (2012). Fundamentos da psicologia cultural: Mundos da mente mundos da vida (p. 356). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Venturi, G., & Bokany, V.. Orgs.)(2013). Indígenas no Brasil: Demandas dos povos e percepções do opinião pública. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.
Vygotski, L. S. (1927/1991). El Significado Histórico de la crisis em Psicología [The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation (van der Veer, R. Translator)]. Em Vygotsky (1991) Obras escogidas I: problemas teóricos y metodológicos de la Psicología (pp. 257–407). Madrid: A. Machado Libros, S. A.
Windelband, W. (1980). Rectorial address, Strasbourg, 1894. History and Theory, 19(2), 169–185.
Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Acknowledgement
This work is supported by FAPESP (grant number 18/13145-0).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guimarães, D.S. (2020). Fourth Principle: Towards a General Psychology. In: Dialogical Multiplication. Latin American Voices. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26702-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26702-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26701-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26702-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)