Advertisement

Engaging Audiences Through Digital Technologies

  • Ben WalmsleyEmail author
Chapter
  • 212 Downloads
Part of the New Directions in Cultural Policy Research book series (NDCPR)

Abstract

This chapter investigates how digital communications technologies are starting to transform philosophies and processes of audience engagement. It situates practices of digital engagement within the wider phenomena of participatory culture and social production, and acknowledges the implications of mass online migration for artists, producers, arts marketers, and policymakers. The chapter explores the relative utility of digital platforms in supporting audience development initiatives, elongating the audience experience, and realising the core marketing objective of fostering two-way communication with audiences. In order to illustrate how theories pertaining to digital engagement play out in practice, the chapter presents four case studies: National Theatre of Scotland’s 5-Minute Theatre, Bristol’s Watershed, Brooklyn Museum, and Yorkshire Dance’s Respond project.

References

  1. Artory. 2015. Artory [Internet]. Artory. Available from: http://www.artory.co.uk [Accessed 18 May].
  2. Arvidsson, A. 2008. The ethical economy of customer coproduction. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(4), pp. 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakhshi, H. and Whitby, A. 2014. Estimating the impact of live simulcast on theatre attendance: An application to London’s National Theatre. London, Nesta.Google Scholar
  4. Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, S. 2013. Moving toward a conversation. Available from: http://www.brooklynmuseum.org/community/blogosphere/2013/06/11/moving-toward-a-conversation [Accessed 5 August].
  6. Bishop, C. 2004. Antagonism and relational aesthetics. October, 110, pp. 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bishop, C. 2006. Participation. London, Whitechapel.Google Scholar
  8. Bolton, M., Cooper, C., Antrobus, C., Ludlow, J. and Tebbutt, H. 2011. Capital matters: How to build financial resilience in the UK’s arts and cultural sector. London, Mission Models Money.Google Scholar
  9. Boorsma, M. 2006. A strategic logic for arts marketing: Integrating customer value and artistic objectives. The International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12(1), pp. 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. BOP Consulting and Festivals and Events International. 2015. Edinburgh Festivals: Thundering Hooves 2.0. A ten year strategy to sustain the success of Edinburgh’s festivals.Google Scholar
  11. Brooklyn Museum. 2015. About: Mission statement [Internet]. New York, Brooklyn Museum. Available from: http://www.brooklynmuseum.org/about/mission.php [Accessed 18 May].
  12. Brown, A. S. and Novak, J. L. 2007. Assessing the intrinsic impacts of a live performance. San Francisco, WolfBrown.Google Scholar
  13. Conner, L. 2013. Audience engagement and the role of arts talk in the digital era. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Cova, B. 1999. From marketing to societing: When the link is more important than the thing. In: Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Wensley, R. and Whittington, R. (eds.) Rethinking marketing: Towards critical marketing accountings. London, Sage, pp. 64–83.Google Scholar
  15. Crawford, G., Gosling, V., Bagnall, G. and Light, B. 2014. Is there an app for that? A case study of the potentials and limitations of the participatory turn and networked publics for classical music audience engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 17(9), pp. 1072–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Culture Counts. 2015. About [Internet]. Available from: http://culturecounts.cc/about [Accessed 19 May].
  17. Debord, G. 1992. Society of the spectacle. London, Rebel Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. 2005. Art as experience. New York, Perigee Books.Google Scholar
  19. Hewison, R. and Holden, J. 2011. The cultural leadership handbook: How to run a creative organization. Farnham, Gower.Google Scholar
  20. Ito, M. 2007. Introduction. In: Varnelis, K. (ed.) Networked publics. London, MIT Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  21. Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. London; New York, Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Keen, A. 2007. The cult of the amateur: How today’s internet is killing our culture and assaulting our economy. London, Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
  23. Kermode, M. 2013. Hatchet job: Love movies, hate critics. London, Picador.Google Scholar
  24. Knell, J. 2007. The art of living: A provocation paper. London, Mission Models Money.Google Scholar
  25. Kozinets, R. 1999. E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal, 17(3), pp. 252–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maxwell, M. 2013. Five-Minute Theatre. E-mail interview with Ben Walmsley. 25 March, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  27. McMillan, J. 2012. Theatre reviews. The Herald, 19 July [Accessed 19 July].Google Scholar
  28. Nesta. 2010. Beyond live: Digital innovation in the performing arts. London, Nesta.Google Scholar
  29. Nesta. 2013. Digital culture: How arts and cultural organisations in England use technology. London, Nesta.Google Scholar
  30. O’Sullivan, T. 2010. Dangling conversations: Web-forum use by a symphony orchestra’s audience members. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(7–8), pp. 656–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Overend, D. 2010. Underneath The Arches: Developing a relational theatre practice in response to a specific cultural site. PhD, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  32. Penny, D. 2009. Imagine an arts sector which works collaboratively to deliver excellence and engage the public. In: Proceedings of the Arts Marketing Association Conference 21–23 July. London, Arts Marketing Association, pp. 48–53.Google Scholar
  33. Pickton, D. and Broderick, A. 2005. Integrated marketing communications. 2nd ed. Harlow, Pearson.Google Scholar
  34. Popat, S. 2006. Invisible connections: Dance, choreography and internet communities. Oxon, Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Reason, M. 2010. Asking the audience: Audience research and the experience of theatre. About Performance, 10, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
  36. Rheingold, H. 1993. The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA, Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  37. Rudman, H. 2006. New horizons. Arts Professional, 11 September, p. 20.Google Scholar
  38. Sharpe, B. 2010. Economies of life: Patterns of health and wealth. Axminster, Triarchy Press.Google Scholar
  39. Shirkey, C. 2009. Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. London; New York, Penguin.Google Scholar
  40. Tepper, S. J. 2008. The next great transformation: Leveraging policy and research to advance cultural vitality. In: Tepper, S. J. and Ivy, B. (eds.) Engaging art: The next great transformation of America’s cultural life. Oxon, Routledge, pp. 363–383.Google Scholar
  41. The Space. 2015. About [Internet]. London, Available from: http://www.thespace.org/about [Accessed 18 May].
  42. Towse, R. 2013. Performing arts. In: Towse, R. and Handke, C. (eds.) Handbook on the digital creative economy. London, Edward Elgar, pp. 311–321.Google Scholar
  43. Walmsley, B. 2013. Co-creating theatre: Authentic engagement or inter-legitimation? Cultural Trends, 22(2), pp. 108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. White, T. R. and Hede, A.-M. 2008. Using narrative inquiry to explore the impact of art on individuals. Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society, 38(1), pp. 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wise, K. 2014. English touring opera: Opera in cinemas. London, Creativeworks.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School Performance Cultural IndustriesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations