Advertisement

Co-creating Art, Meaning, and Value

  • Ben WalmsleyEmail author
Chapter
  • 224 Downloads
Part of the New Directions in Cultural Policy Research book series (NDCPR)

Abstract

Co-creative activities have now become an integral part of artistic experiences, as audience engage and are engaged in cognitive, emotional, and imaginal practices to appropriate and make sense of cultural products and experiences. This chapter investigates why and how audience expectations and behaviours are changing, and explores emerging theories, concepts and practices of co-creation, including active spectatorship, co-production, participation, play, interpretation, and facilitation. The chapter reviews the drivers behind co-creation and argues that artists and arts organisations have a strategic, artistic and social responsibility to develop their audiences’ co-creative skills. It investigates how co-creation can be used to generate and extract meaning in a collaborative way, and illustrates how this collaboration can have a positive impact on audience engagement.

References

  1. Arts Council England. 2010. Audience development and marketing [Internet]. London, Arts Council England. Available from: http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/information-sheet/audience-development-and-marketing-grants-for-the-arts [Accessed 2 June].
  2. Arvidsson, A. 2008. The ethical economy of customer coproduction. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(4), pp. 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayliss, A., Hayles, D., Palmer, S. and Sheridan, J. G. 2009. (Re)searching through play: Play as a framework and methodology for collaborative design processes. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 2(1–2), pp. 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, S. 1997. Theatre audiences: A theory of production and reception. 2nd ed. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bilton, C. 2007. Management and creativity: From creative industries to creative management. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Bilton, C. 2017. The disappearing product: Marketing and markets in the creative industries. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, C. 2004. Antagonism and relational aesthetics. October, 110, pp. 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau, H. 1990. The audience. Baltimore, The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boorsma, M. 2006. A strategic logic for arts marketing: Integrating customer value and artistic objectives. The International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12(1), pp. 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boorsma, M. and Chiaravalloti, F. 2010. Arts marketing performance: An artistic-mission-led approach to evaluation. The Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society, 40(4), pp. 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational aesthetics. Dijon, Les Presses du Réel.Google Scholar
  13. Bourriaud, N. 2006/1998. Relational aesthetics. In: Bishop, C. (ed.) Participation. London, Whitechapel Gallery, pp. 160–171.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, A. S., Novak-Leonard, J. L. and Gilbride, S. 2011. Getting in on the act: How arts groups are creating opportunities for active participation. San Francisco, CA, The James Irvine Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, A. S. and Ratzkin, R. 2011. Making sense of audience engagement: A critical assessment of efforts by nonprofit arts organizations to engage audiences and visitors in deeper and more impactful arts experiences. San Francisco, The San Francisco Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Caldwell, M. 2001. Applying General Living Systems Theory to learn consumers’ sense making in attending performing arts. Psychology & Marketing, 18(5), pp. 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colbert, F. 2007. Marketing culture and the arts. 3rd ed. Montreal, HEC Montreal.Google Scholar
  18. Conner, L. 2004. Who gets to tell the meaning? Building audience enrichment. GIA Reader [Online], 15(1).Google Scholar
  19. Conner, L. 2013. Audience engagement and the role of arts talk in the digital era. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Cova, B. and Cova, V. 2009. Faces of the new consumer: A genesis of consumer governmentality. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 24(3), pp. 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crawford, G., Gosling, V., Bagnall, G. and Light, B. 2014. Is there an app for that? A case study of the potentials and limitations of the participatory turn and networked publics for classical music audience engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 17(9), pp. 1072–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Debord, G. 1992. Society of the spectacle. London, Rebel Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dwyer, P. 2004. Making bodies talk in Forum Theatre. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Perfomance, 9(2), pp. 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. European Commission. 2015. Study on audience development: How to place audiences at the centre of cultural organisations. Brussels, European Commission.Google Scholar
  25. Freshwater, H. 2009. Theatre & audience. London, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Gadamer, H.-G. 1989. Truth and method. 2nd revised ed. New York, Crossroad.Google Scholar
  27. Goldbard, A. and Adams, D. 1990. Cultural policy and cultural democracy. In: Goldbard, A. and Adams, D. (eds.) Crossroads: Reflections on the politics of culture. Talmage, CA, DNA Press, pp. 107–109.Google Scholar
  28. Govier, L. 2009. Leaders in co-creation: Why and how museums could develop their co-creative practice with the public, building on ideas from the performing arts and other non-museum organisations. Leicester, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
  29. Grobman, G. M. 2005. Complexity theory: A new way to look at organizational change. Public Administration Quarterly, 29(3–4), pp. 351–384.Google Scholar
  30. Grönroos, C. 2011. Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), pp. 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heim, C. 2016. Audience as performer: The changing role of theatre audiences in the Twenty-First Century. London and New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Heim, C. L. 2012. ‘Argue with us!’: Audience co-creation through post-performance discussions. New Theatre Quarterly, 28(2), pp. 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hodgson, D. 2002. “Know your customer”: Marketing, governmentality and the “new consumer” of financial services. Management Decision, 40(4), pp. 318–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ind, N., Fuller, C. and Trevail, C. 2012. Brand together: How co-creation generates innovation and re-energizes brands. London, Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  35. Jancovich, L. 2011. Great art for everyone? Engagement and participation policy in the arts. Cultural Trends, 20(3–4), pp. 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jancovich, L. 2017. The participation myth. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(1), pp. 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jenkins, H. and Bertozzi, V. 2008. Artistic expression in the age of participatory culture. In: Tepper, S. J. and Ivey, B. (eds.) Engaging art: The next great transformation of American cultural life. New York, Routledge, pp. 171–195.Google Scholar
  38. Johanson, K. and Glow, H. 2015. A virtuous circle: The positive evaluation phenomenon in arts audience research. Participations, 12(1), pp. 254–270.Google Scholar
  39. Juncker, B. and Balling, G. 2016. The value of art and culture in everyday life: Towards an expressive cultural democracy. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 46(5), pp. 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keen, A. 2008. The cult of the amateur: How blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the rest of today’s user-generated media are destroying our economy, our culture, and our values. New York, Doubleday.Google Scholar
  41. Kester, G. 2005. Conversation pieces: The role of dialogue in socially engaged art. In: Kocur, Z. and Leung, S. (eds.) Theory in contemporary art since 1985. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 76–100.Google Scholar
  42. Knell, J. 2004. Whose art is it anyway? London, The Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar
  43. Leadbeater, C. 2009. The art of with. Manchester, Cornerhouse.Google Scholar
  44. Machon, J. 2013. Immersive theatres: Intimacy and immediacy in contemporary performance. London, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Malpas, J. 2016. Hans-Georg Gadamer. In: Zalta, E. N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy [Online]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/gadamer [Accessed 19 April].
  46. McConachie, B. 2008. Engaging audiences: A cognitive approach to spectating in the theatre. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. McMaster, B. 2008. Supporting excellence in the arts: From measurement to judgement. London, Department for Culture Media and Sport.Google Scholar
  48. Nicholson, R. E. and Pearce, D. G. 2001. Why do people attend events? A comparative analysis of visitor motivations at four south island events. Journal of Travel Research, 39(4), pp. 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Sullivan, T. 2009. All together now: A symphony orchestra audience as a consuming community. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 12(3), pp. 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Toole, J., Adams, R.-J., Anderson, M., Burton, B. and Ewing, R. (eds.). 2014. Young audiences, theatre and the cultural conversation. Dordrecht, Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Payne, A. F. and Frow, P. 2005. A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69, pp. 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K. and Frow, P. 2008. Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, pp. 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pine, B. J. and Gilmore, J. H. 1999. The experience economy: Work is theatre and every business a stage. Boston, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  54. Pope, R. 2005. Creativity: Theory, history, practice. London and New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, V. 2004a. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), pp. 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, V. 2004b. The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard, HBS Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rancière, J. 2011. The emancipated spectator. London, Verso.Google Scholar
  58. Reason, M. 2010. Asking the audience: Audience research and the experience of theatre. About Performance 10, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
  59. Royal Shakespeare Company. 2017. Press release [Internet]. Stratford-on-Avon, Royal Shakespeare Company. Available from: https://www.rsc.org.uk/press/releases/spring-mischief-festival-the-other-place-stratford-upon-avon-24-may-17-june [Accessed 10 November].
  60. Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, Harper.Google Scholar
  61. Sicart, M. 2014. Play matters. Boston, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  62. Simon, N. 2010. The participatory museum. Santa Cruz, Museum 2.0.Google Scholar
  63. Tanggaard, L. (ed.). 2014. Fooling around: Creative learning pathways. Charlotte, NC, Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  64. Walmsley, B. 2013. Co-creating theatre: Authentic engagement or inter-legitimation? Cultural Trends, 22(2), pp. 108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walmsley, B. 2016. From arts marketing to audience enrichment: How digital engagement can deepen and democratize artistic exchange with audiences. Poetics, 58, pp. 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Whalley, J. and Miller, L. 2017. Between us: Audiences, affect and the in-between. London, Palgrave.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School Performance Cultural IndustriesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations