Skip to main content

Decision Support for Declarative Artifact-Centric Process Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Forum (BPM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 360))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Data-driven business processes involve knowledge workers that process information to take decisions. Such processes have been modelled successfully using artifact-centric process models. Artifacts represent business entities about which the knowledge workers collect and process information. Since information retrieval costs time and money, the key goal is to retrieve only the pieces of information that are needed to make a well-informed decision. To aid knowledge workers in achieving this goal, this paper realizes decision support for declarative artifact-centric process models by showing how declarative artifact-centric process models can be translated into Markov Decision Processes (MDP). The approach is illustrated with an example from the field of financial services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barba, I., Weber, B., Del Valle, C., Jiménez-Ramírez, A.: User recommendations for the optimized execution of business processes. Data Knowl. Eng. 86, 61–84 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Batoulis, K., Baumgraß, A., Herzberg, N., Weske, M.: Enabling dynamic decision making in business processes with DMN. In: Reichert, M., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2015. LNBIP, vol. 256, pp. 418–431. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. BizAgi, et al.: Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN), v1.1 (2016), OMG Document Number formal/2016-12-01, Object Management Group

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conforti, R., de Leoni, M., La Rosa, M., van der Aalst, W.M., ter Hofstede, A.H.: A recommendation system for predicting risks across multiple business process instances. Decis. Support Syst. 69, 1–19 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Damaggio, E., Hull, R., Vaculin, R.: On the equivalence of incremental and fixpoint semantics for business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles. Inf. Syst. 38(4), 561–584 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Decision Management Solutions, et al.: Decision Model and Notation (DMN), v1.2 (2019), OMG Document Number formal/19-01-05, Object Management Group

    Google Scholar 

  7. Di Ciccio, C., Marrella, A., Russo, A.: Knowledge-intensive processes: characteristics, requirements and analysis of contemporary approaches. J. Data Semant. 4(1), 29–57 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eshuis, R., Firat, M.: Modeling uncertainty in declarative artifact-centric process models. In: Daniel, F., Sheng, Q.Z., Motahari, H. (eds.) BPM 2018. LNBIP, vol. 342, pp. 281–293. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Eshuis, R., Hull, R., Yi, M.: Reasoning about property preservation in adaptive case management. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 19(1), 12:1–12:21 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghattas, J., Soffer, P., Peleg, M.: Improving business process decision making based on past experience. Decis. Support Syst. 59, 93–107 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grossmann, W., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Fundamentals of Business Intelligence. Data-Centric Systems and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46531-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Hauder, M., Pigat, S., Matthes, F.: Research challenges in adaptive case management: a literature review. In: 2014 IEEE EDOC, pp. 98–107. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hull, R., et al.: Introducing the guard-stage-milestone approach for specifying business entity lifecycles. In: Bravetti, M., Bultan, T. (eds.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 1–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19589-1_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Lakshmanan, G.T., Shamsi, D., Doganata, Y.N., Unuvar, M., Khalaf, R.: A Markov prediction model for data-driven semi-structured business processes. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 42(1), 97–126 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim, C., Bearden, J.N., Smith, J.C.: Sequential search with multiattribute options. Decis. Anal. 3(1), 3–15 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mertens, S., Gailly, F., Poels, G.: Towards a decision-aware declarative process modeling language for knowledge-intensive processes. Expert Syst. Appl. 87, 316–334 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nigam, A., Caswell, N.S.: Business artifacts: an approach to operational specification. IBM Syst. J. 42(3), 428–445 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Petrusel, R.: Using Markov decision process for recommendations based on aggregated decision data models. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2013. LNBIP, vol. 157, pp. 125–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38366-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Provost, F., Fawcett, T.: Data Science for Business: What You Need to Know About Data Mining and Data-analytic Thinking. O’Reilly, Newton (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Puterman, M.L.: Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rozinat, A., Wynn, M.T., van der Aalst, W.M., ter Hofstede, A.H., Fidge, C.J.: Workflow simulation for operational decision support. Data Knowl. Eng. 68(9), 834–850 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schonenberg, H., Weber, B., van Dongen, B., van der Aalst, W.: Supporting flexible processes through recommendations based on history. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 51–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85758-7_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Seber, G.A., Lee, A.J.: Linear Regression Analysis, vol. 329. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vaculin, R., Hull, R., Heath, T., Cochran, C., Nigam, A., Sukaviriya, P.: Declarative business artifact centric modeling of decision and knowledge intensive business processes. In: 2011 IEEE EDOC, pp. 151–160. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vanderfeesten, I., Reijers, H.A., Van der Aalst, W.M.: Product-based workflow support. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 517–535 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Voorberg, S., Eshuis, R., van Jaarsveld, W., van Houtum, G.J.: Appendix to: Decision Support for Declarative Artifact-Centric Processes (2019). http://is.ieis.tue.nl/staff/heshuis/dsdacp.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Voorberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Voorberg, S., Eshuis, R., van Jaarsveld, W., van Houtum, GJ. (2019). Decision Support for Declarative Artifact-Centric Process Models. In: Hildebrandt, T., van Dongen, B., Röglinger, M., Mendling, J. (eds) Business Process Management Forum. BPM 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 360. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26643-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26643-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26642-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26643-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics