Skip to main content

Towards Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Model for Performance Evaluation of Healthcare Sector Services

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1026))

Abstract

All service providers strive to attain superior service quality (SQ), since the demand for provision of high quality customer focused services is constantly rising. In the healthcare sector, it becomes of utmost importance to understand consumer expectations and their needs to effectively remain competitive in the market. Increase in the per capita income of clients has made them increase their aspiration level to demand enhanced quality services. Currently, hospitals in Nairobi City County (NCC) in Kenya, do not offer services to patients based on their aspirations and in the process, they lose clients. There is need for hospital administrators to determine how patients perceive healthcare quality service, and employ techniques that match their expectations. This is probable by using patients to evaluate their services based on identified criteria. Human evaluations are normally imprecise thus uncertainty aspects should be integrated in the evaluation process. Techniques employed should be able to handle the subjective nature of human evaluators. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) model has been designed to analyze the service quality in the healthcare sector based on SERVQUAL dimensions. The model is capable of handling the uncertainty and vagueness involved in the mapping of one’s preference to an exact number or ratio. It has been used to measure the SQ of four hospitals from NCC by computing the priority of each of the dimensions of healthcare SQ attributes. The priority is then used for ranking the best hospital from the patient’s perspective. Hospital managers can use the results of this assessment as a basis of employing strategies that would ensure they provide quality services to patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The Constitution of Kenya (2010). https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ke/ke019en.pdf. Accessed Aug 2018

  2. Donabedian, A.: Quality assessment and assurance: unity of purpose, diversity of means. Inquiry 25(1), 175–192 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall, G.N., Ron, D.H., Rebecca, M.: Health status and satisfaction with healthcare: results from the medical outcomes study. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 64(2), 380–390 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, L., Benton, W.C.: Hospital capacity management decisions: emphasis on cost control and quality enhancement. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 146(3), 596–614 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Headley, D.E., Miller, S.J.: Measuring service quality and its relationship to future consumer behaviour. Mark. Health Serv. 13(4), 32–42 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sgroi, F., Di Trapani, A.M., Testa, R., Tudisca, S.: Strategy to increase the farm competitiveness. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 9, 394–400 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Squatrito, R., Sgroi, F., Tudisca, S., Di Trapani, A.M., Testa, R.: Post feed-in scheme photovoltaic system feasibility evaluation in Italy: sicilian case studies. Energies 7, 7147–7165 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi, K.S., Cho, W.H., Lee, S., Lee, H., Kim, C.: The relationships among quality, value, satisfaction and behavioral intention in health care provider choice: a South Korean study. J. Bus. Res. 57(8), 913–921 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, M.A., Yom, Y.H.: A comparative study of patients’ and nurses’ perceptions of the quality of nursing services, satisfaction and intent to revisit the hospital: a questionnaire survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 44, 545–555 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hulton, L.A., Matthews, Z., Stones, R.W.: Applying a framework for assessing the quality of maternal health services in urban India. Soc. Sci. Med. 64(10), 2083–2095 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, T.J., Churchill, G.A.: Peter, J: Improving the measurement of service quality. J. Retail. 69(1), 127–139 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 71–79 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schvaneveldt, S.J., Enkawa, T., Miyakawa, M.: Consumer evaluation perspectives of service quality: evaluation factors and two-way model of quality. Total Qual. Manag. 2, 149–161 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kucukarslan, S.N., Nadkarni, A.: Evaluating medication-related services in a hospital setting using the disconfirmation of expectations model of satisfaction. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 4(1), 12–22 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Laschinger, H.S., Hall, L.M., Pedersen, C., Almost, J.: A psychometric analysis of the patient satisfaction ith nursing care quality questionnaire: an actionable approach to measuring patient satisfaction. J. Nurs. Care Qual. 20(3), 220–230 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lupo, T.: Benchmarking of airports service quality by a new fuzzy MCDM approach. Eur. Transp. Trasporti Europei 57 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addion-Wesley, Reading (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(2), 445–455 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, New York (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, Y., Hu, Y., Zhang, X., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S.: An evidential DEMATEL method to identify critical success factors in emergency management. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 22, 504–510 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang, T.H.: Fuzzy VIKOR method: a case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan. Inf. Sci. 271, 196–212 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chou, C.C., Liu, L.J., Huang, S.F., Yih, J.M., Han, T.C.: An evaluation of airline service quality using the fuzzy weighted ServQual method. Appl. Soft Comput. 11, 2117–2128 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. De Battisti, F., Nicolini, G., Salini, S.: The Rasch model in customer satisfaction survey data. Qual. Technol. Quant. Manag. 7(1), 15–34 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu, H.Y., Lee, Y.C., Yen, T.M.: Service quality gaps analysis based on fuzzy linguistic SERVQUAL with a case study in hospital out-patient services. TQM J. 22(5), 499–515 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Mark. 49, 41–50 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aktas, A., Cebi, S., Temiz, I.: A new evaluation model for service quality of healthcare systems based on AHP and information axiom. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28, 1009–1021 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Baki, B., Peker, I.: An integrated evaluation model for service quality of hospitals: a case study from Turkey. J. Mult. Valued Logic Soft Comput. 24(5–6), 453–474 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, G., Lin, H.: Customer perceptions of e-service quality in online shopping. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 33(2), 161–176 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E.K.: Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications: two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(8), 4126–4148 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Calabrese, A.: Service productivity and service quality: a necessary trade-off? Prod. Int. J. Econ. 135(2), 800–812 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Babakus, E., Boller, G.W.: An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. J. Bus. Res. 24(3), 253–268 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wasserman, G.S.: On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. IIE Trans. 25(3), 59–65 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sgroi, F., Tudisca, S., Di Trapani, A.M., Testa, R.: Economic evaluation of aquaculture investments under conditions of risk and uncertainty in the Mediterranean Sea. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 11, 1727–1734 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sgroi, F., Tudisca, S., Di Trapani, A.M., Testa, R., Squatrito, R.: Efficacy and efficiency of Italian energy policy: the case of PV systems in greenhouse farms. Energies 7(6), 3985–4001 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Certa, A., Enea, M., Galante, G.M., La Fata, C.M.: A multistep methodology for the evaluation of human resources using the evidence theory. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 28(11), 1072–1088 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Montes, R., Sánchez, A.M., Villar, P., Herrera, F.: A web tool to support decision making in the housing market using hesitant fuzzy linguistic termsets. Appl. Soft Comput. 35, 949–957 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Heradio, R., Cabrerizo, F.J., Fernandez-Amoros, D., Herrera, M., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A fuzzy linguistic model to evaluate the quality of library 2.0 functionalities. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33(4), 642–654 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cabrerizo, F.J., Martínez, M.A., López-Gijón, J., Esteban, B., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Anew quality evaluation model generating recommendations to improve the digital services provided by the academic digital libraries. In: 2011 International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress and the 2011 Asian Fuzzy Systems Society (IFSA 2011), Surabaya and Bali Island (Indonesia), pp. RW 202 1–RW 202 6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  41. López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F.: Applying multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to the automatic learning of extended boolean queries in fuzzy ordinal linguistic information retrieval systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160, 2192–2205 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Bogetoft, P., Pruzan, P.: Planning with multiple criteria: investigation, communication and choice. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 8(2), 112 (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Dodgson, J., Spackman, M., Pearman, A., Phillips, L.: Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Department for Communities and Local Government, London (2009). http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/12761/

  44. Abbas, M., Ahmad, J., Edmundas, K.Z., Zainab, K., Khalil, M.D.N.: Application of multiple-criteria decision-making techniques and approaches to evaluating of service quality: a systematic review of the literature. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 16(5), 1034–1068 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Simpson, L.: Do decision makers know what they prefer?: MAVT and ELECTRE II. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 47(7), 919–929 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Musumba, G.W., Wario, R.D.: Towards group fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. In: Mekuria, F., Nigussie, E.E., Dargie, W., Edward, M., Tegegne, T. (eds.) ICT4DA 2017. LNICST, vol. 244, pp. 283–307. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95153-9_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process, vol. 175. Springer, New York (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Vaidya, O., Kumar, S.: Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169(1), 1–29 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Mikhailov, L.: Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 134(3), 365–385 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. van Laarhoven, P., van Pedrycz, W.: A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 11(1), 199–227 (1983)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Ahmad, A., Basir, O., Hassanein, K.: Adaptive user interfaces for intelligent e-learning: issues and trends. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB 2004), Beijing, pp. 925–934 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tseng, M.L.: A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(4), 7738–7748 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Li, L.X.: Relationships between determinants of hospital quality management and service quality performance – a path analytic model. Omega 25(5), 535–545 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Min, H., Mitra, A., Oswald, S.: Competitive benchmarking of health care quality using the analytic hierarchy process: an example from Korean cancer clinics. Soc.-Econ. Plan. Sci. 31(2), 147–159 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Chang, S.J., Hsiao, H.C., Huang, L.H., Chang, H.: Taiwan quality indicator project and hospital productivity growth. Omega 39(1), 14–22 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Teng, C.I., Ing, C.K., Chang, H.Y., Chung, K.P.: Development of service quality scale for surgical hospitalization. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 106(6), 475–484 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Shieh, J.I., Wu, H.-H., Huang, K.K.: A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowl.-Based Syst. 23(3), 277–282 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kubler, S., Robert, J., Derigent, W., Voisin, A., Le Traon, Y.: A state-of the-art survey & testbed of Fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 65, 398–422 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Büyüközkan, G., Cifci, G., Güleryüz, S.: Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(8), 9407–9424 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ju, Y., Wang, A., Liu, X.: Evaluating emergency response capacity by Fuzzy AHP: and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(8), 6972–6981 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Shahin, A., Janatyan, N.: Estimation of customer dissatisfaction based on service quality gaps by correlation and regression analysis in a travel agency. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 6(3), 99–108 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zaim, H., Bayyurt, N., Zaim, S.: Service quality and determinants of customer satisfaction in hospitals: Turkish experience. Int. Bus. Econ. Res. J. 9(5), 51 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: An empirical test of the extended gaps model of service quality. In: Marketing Science Institute Working Paper, pp. 90–122 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bitner, M.J., Hubbert, A.R.: Encounter satisfaction versus overall satisfaction versus service quality: the consumer’s voice. In: Rust, R.T., Oliver, R.L. (eds.) Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, pp. 72–94. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  67. Prakash, A., Mohanty, R.P., Kallurkar, S.P.: Service quality modelling for life insurance business using neural networks. Int. J. Prod. Qual. Manag. 7(3), 263–286 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Grönroos, C.: Strategic Management and Marketing in the Service Sector. Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsingfors (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Akter, S., Hani, U., Upal, M.: Service quality perception and satisfaction: a study in suburban public hospitals in Bangladesh. Int. J. Serv. Res. February (Special Issue), 125–145 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Jager, D.J., Plooy, D.T.: Are public hospitals responding to tangible and reliable service related needs of patients in the new South Africa? J. Manag. Policy Pract. 12(2), 105–119 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Kuo, H.P.: Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation applied in the performance assessment of service quality of insurance companies in Taiwan. J. Am. Acad. Bus. 16(1), 84–92 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Priporas, C.V., Laspa, C., Kamenidou, I.: Patient satisfaction measurement for in hospital services: a pilot study in Greece. J. Med. Mark. 8(4), 325–340 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Sohail, M.: Service quality in hospitals, more favourable than you might think. Manag. Serv. Qual. 13(2), 197–206 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Sajid, M.S., Baig, M.K.: Quality of health care, an absolute necessity for public satisfaction. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 20(6), 545–548 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Jabnoun, N., Chacker, M.: Comparing the quality of private and public hospitals. Manag. Serv. Qual. 13(4), 290–299 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Boshoff, C., Gray, B.: The relationships between service quality, customer satisfaction and buying intentions in the private hospital industry. South Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 35(4), 27–38 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ramsaran-Fowdar, R.R.: The relative importance of service dimensions in a healthcare setting. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 21(1), 104–124 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Padma, P., Rajendran, C., Sai, L.P.: A conceptual framework of service quality in healthcare perspectives of Indian patients and their attendants. Benchmark. Int. J. 16(2), 157–191 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Aagja, J.P., Garg, R.: Measuring perceived service quality for public hospitals (PubHosQual) in the Indian context. Int. J. Pharm. Healthc. Mark. 4(1), 60–83 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Ladhari, R.: Alternative measure of service quality: a review. J. Manag. Serv. Qual. 18(1), 65–86 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Chen, M.F., Tzeng, G.H., Tang, T.: Fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of expatriate assignments. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 4(2), 277–296 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning: parts 1, 2 and 3. Inf. Sci. 8, 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. Sinimole, K.R.: Performance evaluation of the hospital services–a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model. Int. J. Prod. Qual. Manag. 101, 112–130 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Saaty, T.L.: Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. Davis, M.A.P.: A multi-criteria decision model application for managing group decisions. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45(1), 47–58 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Wamamu Musumba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Musumba, G.W., Wario, R.D. (2019). Towards Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Model for Performance Evaluation of Healthcare Sector Services. In: Mekuria, F., Nigussie, E., Tegegne, T. (eds) Information and Communication Technology for Development for Africa. ICT4DA 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1026. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26630-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26630-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26629-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26630-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics