Abstract
The safety design definition of a safety critical system is a complex task. On the one hand, the system designer must ensure that he addressed all potentially hazardous harwdware faults. This is often defined not(!) in the model but within extra documents (e.g., Excel sheets). On the other hand, all defined safety mechanisms must be transformed back into the system model. We think an improvement for the designer would be given by a modeling extension integrating relevant safety design artifacts into the normal design work-flow and supporting the safety design development directly from within the model.
To address this issue, we developed the UML-profile SafeDeML extending standard SysML such that it integrates the fault modeling into the system modeling. In addition, we defined a modeling process with special attention to the Iso 26262 standard. Therefore we introduce special elements for the diagnosis, modeling required safety mechanisms within the model and developed a library for standard Iso 26262 faults and corresponding hardware components, intended to lower the potential of missing important fault definitions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Road vehicles - Functional safety: Part(X): Standard
Adler, R., et al.: Integration of component fault trees into the UML. In: Dingel, J., Solberg, A. (eds.) MODELS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6627, pp. 312–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21210-9_30
Avižienis, A., Laprie, J.-C., Randell, B.: Dependability and its threats: a taxonomy. In: Jacquart, R. (ed.) Building the Information Society. IFIP, vol. 156, pp. 91–120. Springer, Boston (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8157-6_13
Bernardi, S., Merseguer, J., Petriu, D.C.: A dependability profile within MARTE. Softw. Syst. Model. 10(3), 313–336 (2011)
Biggs, G., Juknevicius, T., Armonas, A., Post, K.: Integrating Safety and Reliability Analysis into MBSE: overview of the new proposed OMG standard. INCOSE Int. Symp. 28(1), 1322–1336 (2018)
Biggs, G., Sakamoto, T., Kotoku, T.: 2A2-I06 SafeML: a model-based tool for communicating safety information (Robotics with Safety and Reliability). In: Proceedings of Robomec 2013(0), \(\_\)2A2-I06\(\_\)1-\(\_\)2A2-I06\(\_\)4 (2013)
Biggs, G., Sakamoto, T., Kotoku, T.: A profile and tool for modelling safety information with design information in SysML. Softw. Syst. Model. 15(1), 147–178 (2016)
Cicchetti, A., et al.: CHESS: a model-driven engineering tool environment for aiding the development of complex industrial systems. In: Goedicke, M., Menzies, T., Saeki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of ASE, p. 362. IEEE, Piscataway (2012)
Fuentes-Fernández, L., Vallecillo-Moreno, A.: An introduction to UML profiles. UML Model Eng. 2, 6–13 (2004)
Gallina, B., Javed, M.A., Muram, F.U., Punnekkat, S.: A model-driven dependability analysis method for component-based architectures. In: Proceedings of Euromicro DSD/SEAA, pp. 233–240 (2012)
Grunske, L., Kaiser, B., Papadopoulos, Y.: Model-driven safety evaluation with state-event-based component failure annotations. In: Heineman, G.T., Crnkovic, I., Schmidt, H.W., Stafford, J.A., Szyperski, C., Wallnau, K. (eds.) CBSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3489, pp. 33–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11424529_3
Kaiser, B., Liggesmeyer, P., Mäckel, O.: A new component concept for fault trees. In: Proceedings of SCS, pp. 37–46 (2003)
Langenhan, T.: Still basic guide to automotive functional safety. epubli, Berlin, version 2 edn. (2016)
Moncada, V., Santiago, V.: Towards proper tool support for component-oriented and model-based development of safety critical systems. In: Commercial Vehicle Technology 2016, pp. 365–374. Shaker Verlag, Aachen (2016)
Montecchi, L., Lollini, P., Bondavalli, A.: Dependability concerns in model-driven engineering. In: Proceedings of ISORC, pp. 254–263. IEEE (2011)
Papadopoulos, Y., McDermid, J.A.: Hierarchically performed hazard origin and propagation studies. In: Felici, M., Kanoun, K. (eds.) SAFECOMP 1999. LNCS, vol. 1698, pp. 139–152. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48249-0_13
Papadopoulos, Y., et al.: Engineering failure analysis and design optimisation with HiP-HOPS. Eng. Fail. Anal. 18(2), 590–608 (2011)
Ross, H.L.: Functional Safety for Road Vehicles. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)
Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The Unified modeling language reference manual. Pearson Higher Education (2004)
Selic, B., Gérard, S.: Modeling and Analysis of Real-Time and Embedded Systems with UML and MARTE: Developing Cyber-Physical Systems. Elsevier (2013)
Mazzini, S., Favaro, J.M., Puri, S., Baracchi, L.: CHESS: an open source methodology and toolset for the development of critical systems. In: EduSymp/OSS4MDE@MoDELS (2016)
Weilkiens, T.: SysML–the systems modeling language. In: The MK/OMG Press (ed.) Systems Engineering with SysML/UML, pp. 223–270. Elsevier (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gonschorek, T., Bergt, P., Filax, M., Ortmeier, F., von Hoyningen-Hüne, J., Piper, T. (2019). SafeDeML: On Integrating the Safety Design into the System Model. In: Romanovsky, A., Troubitsyna, E., Bitsch, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11698. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26601-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26601-1_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26600-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26601-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)