Abstract
This chapter examines Hegel’s complex relation to pragmatism. After a short review of the extant literature on their relation, deVries focuses on their shared rejection of the Cartesian tradition, which assumes that minds are immaterial, self-contained substances that are (1) transparent to themselves, (2) known directly or immediately to themselves, (3) prior to and independently of any knowledge of any other created substance, e.g., the external world. Hegel and the pragmatists rejected this view for at least three reasons. (1) The Cartesians employ an impoverished conception of experience that does not do justice to the complex interplay of the sensory and the conceptual nor to the fact that experience is not a screen separating us from external reality, but a mode in which we inhabit the world we live in. (2) Humans are agents, and human agency makes sense only if humans are embodied beings in an external, material world. (3) Both Hegel and the pragmatists recognized that rationality and its constitutive normativity are social achievements (both phylogenetically and ontogenetically) built on the mutual acknowledgement of the value and authority of persons as such. Still, Hegel cannot be called a pragmatist himself. Hegel does not accord the same value to the sensory as the pragmatists: he talks of freeing ourselves from the sensory, whereas the pragmatists want to better orchestrate and interpret it. More important, Hegel abjures the notion of a regulative ideal, an ideal the final achievement of which may always lie ahead. For Hegel, the ideal is the real. But in pragmatism, the real is itself an ideal. Finally, the case of Josiah Royce, deeply influenced by pragmatism, yet remaining throughout his career an absolute idealist, shows how complex the relationship between Hegelianism and pragmatism is.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Aune, Bruce. 1970. Rationalism, Empiricism, and Pragmatism: An Introduction. New York: Random House.
Brandom, Robert B. 1999. “Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel’s Idealism: Negotiation and Administration in Hegel’s Account of the Structure and Content of Conceptual Norms.” European Journal of Philosophy 7 (2): 164–189. Reprinted in Brandom 2002.
Brandom, Robert B. 2001. “Holism and Idealism in Hegel’s Phenomenology.” Hegel Studien 36: 57–92. Reprinted in Brandom 2002.
Brandom, Robert B. 2002. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brandom, Robert B. 2019. A Spirit of Trust: A Reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Descartes, René. 1641/1984. Meditations on First Philosophy in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 2. Edited and translated John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, 1–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Vries, Willem A. 1988. Hegel’s Theory of Mental Activity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Dewey, John. 1897/2010. John Dewey’s Philosophy of Spirit, with the 1897 Lecture on Hegel. Edited by John R. Shook and James A. Good. New York: Fordham University Press.
Dewey, John. 1935. “The Future of Liberalism.” The Journal of Philosophy 32 (9): 225–230.
Emundts, Dina. 2013. “Idealism and Pragmatism: The Inheritance of Hegel’s Concept of Experience.” In The Impact of Idealism: The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought. Vol. I: Philosophy and Natural Sciences, edited by Karl Ameriks, 347–372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Emundts, Dina. 2015. “Hegel as a Pragmatist.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (4): 611–631.
Giladi, P. 2015a. “Hegel’s Therapeutic Conception of Philosophy.” Hegel Bulletin 36 (2): 248–267.
Giladi, P. 2015b. “A Critique of Rorty’s Conception of Pragmatism.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 7 (2): 168–185.
Giladi, P. 2016. “Thought and Experience: Robust Conceptions of Phenomenology.” Revista Eletronica Estudos Hegelianos 13: 39–54.
James, William. 1902. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Levine, Steven. 2015. “Hegel, Dewey, and Habits.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (4): 632–656.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–6, edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, 1931–1935, vols. 7–8, edited by A. W. Burks, 1958. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. References to volume number and paragraph number.
Pinkard, Terry. 2006. “Sellars the Post-Kantian?” In The Self-Correcting Enterprise: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars, edited by Michael P. Wolf and Mark N. Lance. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Pinkard, Terry. 2007. “Was Pragmatism the Successor to Idealism?” In The New Pragmatists, edited by Cheryl Misak. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Redding, Paul. 2015. “Hegel and Pragmatism.” In G. W. F. Hegel: Key Concepts, edited by Michael Baur, 182–192. New York: Routledge.
Stern, Robert. 2004. “Peirce on Hegel: Nominalist or Realist.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41: 65–99.
Stern, Robert. 2007a. “Peirce, Hegel and the Category of Firstness.” International Yearbook of German Idealism 5: 276–308.
Stern, Robert. 2007b. “Peirce, Hegel, and the Category of Secondness.” Inquiry 50: 123–155.
Stern, Robert. 2009. Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2011. “Hegel and Pragmatism.” In A Companion to Hegel, edited by Michael Baur and Stephen Houlgate, 556–575. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stovall, Preston. 2015. “Inference by Analogy and the Progress of Knowledge: From Reflection to Determination in Judgements of Natural Purpose.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (4): 681–709.
Westphal, Kenneth. 2004. “Hegel and Realism.” In A Companion to Pragmatism, edited by John R. Shook and Joseph Margolis, 177–183. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Westphal, Kenneth. 2015a. “Hegel’s Pragmatic Critique & Reconstruction of Kant’s System of Principles in the 1807 Phenomenology of Spirit.” Hegel Bulletin 36 (2): 159–183.
Westphal, Kenneth. 2015b. “Hegel’s Pragmatic Critique & Reconstruction of Kant’s System of Principles in the Logic & Encyclopaedia.” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 54 (2): 333–369.
Westphal, Kenneth. 2015c. “Causal Realism & the Limits of Empiricism: Some Unexpected Insights from Hegel.” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (2): 281–317.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Vries, W. (2020). Hegel’s Pragmatism. In: Bykova, M.F., Westphal, K.R. (eds) The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26597-7_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26597-7_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26596-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26597-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)