Abstract
In this chapter, I demonstrate that in his philosophy of ‘objective spirit’ Hegel was dealing with the problems that still preoccupy economic and social theory today. His starting points, an individual inhabiting capitalist economy, and this economy with its swift modernization and growing sophistication of needs and techniques, remind of—but surely do not coincide with—the basic presuppositions of current economic thinking. The new social form envisaged by Hegel, known under the name of ‘civil society,’ was, however, conceived as requiring a remedy to the phenomena it comprised: to the increasing atomization and isolation of human particularities and to the unrestrained self-seeking, the consequences of which were unemployment and pauperization. Homo oeconomicus had to be integrated into the more overwhelming cooperative framework of concrete universality—the state as actualized freedom. This general normative and political task in Hegel’s practical philosophy is paired with certain explanatory strategies that, I argue, play the major role in understanding the ‘objective spirit’ as a system of institutions. These ontological and heuristic principles include: continuity between physicality of individual action and sociality of institutional structures externalizing the inner; performativity implying that the spirit is a dynamic teleological embodiment of itself, its own becoming, revealing the meaning of its parts only in realization; and recognition designating the social bond and the struggle underlying the institutional edifice of modernity. Hence, not merely Hegel’s policy proposals aimed at limiting poverty and unemployment are familiar to modern economists. His institutional theory involves the challenges to and tensions of economic theorizing as it is practiced right now. Examples I draw upon are theories of social preferences, economic psychology of preferences as actions, and the suggestions to revive the notion of habit (so prominent in Hegel) as the very substance of institutional reality. Given the recent upsurge of institutional economics, these concurrences imply the lasting relevance of Hegel’s methodological and political perspectives and the need to re-integrate them as a classical foundation into any economic science to come.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Alesina, Alberto, and Paola Giuliano. 2015. “Culture and Institutions,” Journal of Economic Literature 53 (4): 898–944.
Anderson, Joel. 2001. “Hegel’s Implicit View on How to Solve the Problem of Poverty.” In Beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism, edited by Robert Williams, 185–205. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Ariely, Dan, and Michael I. Norton. 2007. “How Actions Create—Not Just Reveal—Preferences.” Trends in Cognitive Science 12 (1): 13–16.
Avineri, Shlomo. 1972. Hegel’s Theory of the Modern State. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Boldyrev, Ivan. 2016. “The Beast and the Universal: Hegel’s Critique of Political Economy.” Crisis and Critique 3 (3): 84–91.
Boldyrev, Ivan, and Carsten Herrmann-Pillath. 2013. “Hegel’s ‘Objective Spirit’, Extended Mind, and the Institutional Nature of Economic Action.” Mind & Society 12 (2): 177–202.
Bowles, Samuel. 1998. “Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 75–111.
Bowles, Samuel, and Sandra Polanía-Reyes. 2012. “Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements?” Journal of Economic Literature 50 (2): 368–425.
Buchwalter, Andrew. 2015. “Introduction. Hegel and Capitalism.” In Hegel and Capitalism, edited by Andrew Buchwalter, 1–17. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Caboret, Dominique. 1999. “The Market Economy and Social Classes in James Steuart and G. W. F. Hegel.” In The Economics of James Steuart, edited by Ramón Tortajada, 57–75. London and New York: Routledge.
Camic, Charles. 1986. “The Matter of Habit.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (5): 1039–1087.
Chamley, Paul. 1963. Économie Politique et Philosophie chez Steuart et Hegel. Paris: Dalloz.
Chamley, Paul. 1965. “Les Origines de la Pensée Économique de Hegel.” Hegel-Studien 3: 225–261.
Collins, Ardis B. 2015. “Anonymity, Responsibility, and the Many Faces of Capitalism: Hegel and the Crisis of the Modern Self.” In Hegel and Capitalism, edited by Andrew Buchwalter, 53–69. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Fatton, Robert, Jr. 1986. “Hegel and the Riddle of Poverty: The Limits of Bourgeois Political Economy.” History of Political Economy 18 (4): 579–600.
Fraser, Ian. 1999. “Speculations on Poverty in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right.” The European Legacy 1 (7): 2055–2068.
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2008. “Moral Intuition = Fast and Frugal Heuristics?” In Moral Psychology, Vol. 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity, edited by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, 1–26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, and Ivan Boldyrev. 2014. Hegel, Institutions, and Economics: Performing the Social. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Herzog, Lisa. 2013. Inventing the Market: Smith, Hegel, and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herzog, Lisa. 2015. “Two Ways of ‘Taming’ the Market: Why Hegel Needs the Police and the Corporations.” In Hegel and Capitalism, edited by Andrew Buchwalter, 147–162. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2004. “Reclaiming Habit for Institutional Economics.” Journal of Economic Psychology 25 (4): 651–660.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2006. “What Are Institutions?” Journal of Economic Issues 40 (1): 1–25.
Lukács, Georg. 1975. The Young Hegel. London: Merlin Press.
Lumsden, Simon. 2013. “Between Nature and Spirit: Hegel’s Account of Habit.” In Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit, edited by David S. Stern, 121–138. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Malabou, Catherine. 2005. The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality, and Dialectic. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Neocleous, Mark. 1998. “Policing the System of Needs: Hegel, Political Economy, and the Police of the Market.” History of European Ideas 24 (1): 43–58.
Paquette, Gabriel. 2003. “Hegel’s Analysis of Colonialism and Its Roots in Scottish Political Economy.” Clio 32 (4): 415–433.
Pereira Di Salvo, Carlos. 2015. “Hegel’s Torment: Poverty and the Rationality of the Modern State.” In Hegel and Capitalism, edited by Andrew Buchwalter, 101–116. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Priddat, Birger. 1990. Hegel als Ökonom. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
Ross, Don. 2012. “The Economic Agent: Not Human, but Important.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 13: Philosophy of Economics, edited by Uskali Mäki, 691–735. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ruda, Frank. 2011. Hegel’s Rabble. An Investigation into Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. London and New York: Continuum.
Schmidt am Busch, Hans-Christoph. 2002. Hegels Begriff der Arbeit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Schmitz, Hermann. 1957. Hegel als Denker der Individualität. Meisenheim/Glan: Hain.
Schnädelbach, Herbert. 2000. Hegels praktische Philosophie. Ein Kommentar der Texte in der Reihenfolge ihrer Entstehung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Stedman Jones, Gareth. 2001. “Hegel and the Economics of Civil Society.” In Civil Society: History and Possibilities, edited by Sudipta Kaviraj and Sunil Khilnani, 105–130. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.
Stekeler, Pirmin. 2014. Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes. Ein dialogischer Kommentar. Bd. 1: Gewissheit und Vernunft. Bd. 2: Geist und Religion. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Taylor, Charles. 1983a. “Hegel and the Philosophy of Action.” In Hegel’s Philosophy of Action, edited by Lawrence Stepelevich and David Lamb, 1–18. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1983b. “Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind.” In Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey. Vol. 4, edited by Guttorm Fløristad, 135–155. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Teichgraeber, Richard. 1977. “Hegel on Property and Poverty.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1): 47–64.
Veblen, Thorstein. 1909. “The Limitations of Marginal Utility.” Journal of Political Economy 17 (9): 620–636.
Walton, A. S. 1984. “Economy, Utility and Community in Hegel’s Theory of Civil Society.” In The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy, edited by Zbigniew A. Pelczynski, 244–261. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.
Wartenberg, Thomas E. 1981. “Poverty and Class Structure in Hegel’s Theory of Civil Society.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 8 (2): 169–182.
Waszek, Norbert. 1988. The Scottish Enlightenment and Hegel’s Account of ‘Civil Society.’ Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Nijhoff-Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boldyrev, I. (2020). Speculative Institutionalism: Hegel’s Legacy for Any Political Economy that Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science. In: Bykova, M.F., Westphal, K.R. (eds) The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26597-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26597-7_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26596-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26597-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)