Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effective Prevention and Intervention for Word-Level Reading Difficulties

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Reading Development and Difficulties

Abstract

The research on the prevention and intervention for word reading problems is reviewed in two parts. First, several key issues are addressed that bear on understanding the findings from the vast reading intervention literature. These include (1) interpreting intervention research in light of the findings from studies of orthographic learning, (2) examining assumptions inherent in current intervention approaches, (3) understanding why some students require intervention in the first place, (4) distinguishing research-based principles from research-based programs, and (5) examining the best ways to determine the effectiveness of interventions for word reading problems. Second, key intervention research findings are examined through the lens of the preliminary issues discussed in the first section. These findings reveal very positive prospects for preventing a large portion of reading difficulties based on modifications to general education classroom instruction. They also show that very substantial reading improvements can be made by struggling readers if the most effective principles are applied to our intervention efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term “normalize” is typically used by researchers to refer to when weak readers raise their reading performance above the 30th or 40th percentiles, depending on how “normalize” is defined in any given study.

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Y., Wagner, R. K., & Kantor, P. T. (2012). How visual word recognition is affected by developmental dyslexia. In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition (Vol. 2, pp. 196–215)., Meaning and context, individuals and development New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, A. W., Andersen, H. G., Heilman, P. C., Voeller, K. K. S., & Torgesen, J. K. (1991). Phonological awareness training and remediation of analytic decoding deficits in a group of severe dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 193–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Algozzine, B., & Lockavith, J. F. (1998). Effects of the failure free reading program on students at-risk for reading failure. Special Services in the Schools, 13(1–2), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics. (2009). Learning disabilities, dyslexia, and vision. Pediatrics, 124, 837–844. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: Report of the commission on reading. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balu, R., Zhu, P., Doolittle, F., Schiller, E., Jenkins, J., & Gersten, R. (2015). Evaluation of response to intervention practices for elementary school reading (NCEE 2016-4000). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., & Beck, M. E. (2013). Making sense of phonics, second edition: The hows and whys. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, P., Griffin, C. C., & Sindelar, P. T. (2003). Phonological awareness instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 26, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. A., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Clonan, S. M., Shaywitz, B. A., et al. (2004). Effects of intensive reading remediation for second and third graders and a 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 444–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L., & Barnhart, C. L. (1961). Let’s read: A linguistic approach. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, A. G., Argüelles, M. E., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Klingner, J. (2005). Special education teachers’ views of research-based practices. Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 168–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. L., & Dykstra, R. (1967). The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 2(4), 5–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S. A. (2011). Efficacy of phonics teaching for reading outcomes: Indications from post-NRP research. In S. A. Brady, D. Braze, & C. A. Fowler (Eds.), Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence (pp. 69–96). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bus, A. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso-Martins, C., Resende, S. Mamede, & Rodrigues, L. Assunção. (2002). Letter name knowledge and the ability to learn to read by processing letter-phoneme relations in words: Evidence from Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3–4), 409–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S., & Popp, H. M. (1996). Teaching and assessing phonics: Why, what, when, how. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Baker, S. K., Doabler, C., & Apichatabutra, C. (2009). Repeated reading interventions for students with learning disabilities: Status of the evidence. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 263–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulou, J. A., Cyr, A., Murtagh, J., Chang, P., Lin, J., Guarino, A. J., et al. (2017). Impact of intensive summer reading intervention for children with reading disabilities and difficulties in early elementary school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 115–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, R. G., & Wagner, R. K. (1992). The psychology of reading: An introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Share, D. L. (2002). Orthographic learning during reading: Examining the role of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 185–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2004). Knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 139–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(6), 254–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M., Stuart, M., & Masterson, J. (2002). The relationship between phonological awareness and the development of orthographic representations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3–4), 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C. K., Cable, A., & Tackett, K. K. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262–300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., & Saltmarsh, J. (1995). Beginning readers outperform older disabled readers in learning to read words by sight. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 295–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 605–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, L. J., Zheng, X., & Swanson, H. L. (2012). Instructing struggling older readers: A selective meta-analysis of intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(1), 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2018). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B., et al. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijters, J. C., Lovett, M. W., Sevcik, R. A., & Morris, R. D. (2013). Four methods of identifying change in the context of a multiple component reading intervention for struggling middle school readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 539–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide. (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. S. (1996). On reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. S. (2005). Making sense of written language: A lifelong journey. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2009). Developmental disorders of language learning and cognition. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyönä, J., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: effects of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1430–1440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, C. (1999). How persistent is reading disability? Individual growth curves in reading. Dyslexia, 5, 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1987). Substance over style: Assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching. Exceptional Children, 54(3), 228–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(3), 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, T. A., & Just, M. A. (2009). Altering cortical connectivity: Remediation-induced changes in the white matter of poor readers. Neuron, 64, 624–631.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, D. A. (2015). Essentials of assessing, preventing, and overcoming reading difficulties. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, D. A. (2018). Incorporating recent advances in understanding word-reading skills into specific learning disability diagnoses: The case of orthographic mapping. In D. P. Flanagan & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuder, S. J. (1990). Effectiveness of DISTAR reading program for children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(1), 69–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuster, S. M., van Weerdenburg, M., Gompel, M., & Bosman, A. M. T. (2018). Dyslexie font does not benefit reading in children with or without dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 68, 25–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laing, E., & Hulme, C. (1999). Phonological and semantic processes influence beginning readers’ ability to learn to read words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 183–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Yoon, S. Y. (2017). The effects of repeated reading on reading fluency for students with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 213–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, M. W., Borden, S. L., DeLuca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N. J., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically- and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 805–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., Borden, S. L., Frijters, J. C., Steinbach, K. A., & De Palma, M. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., De Palma, M., & Frijters, J. C. (2012). Evaluating the efficacy of remediation for struggling readers in high school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(2), 151–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maughan, B., Hagell, H., Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1994). Poor readers in secondary school. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 125–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, C., McGuinness, D., & McGuinness, G. (1996). Phono-Graphix: A new method for remediating reading difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 73–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., & Begeny, J. C. (2014). Improving student reading through parents’ implementation of a structured reading program. School Psychology Review, 43(1), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (1994). Missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. (2009). Still wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language. Introduction to special issue. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 387–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. D., Steubing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Lyon, G. R., Shankweiler, D. P., et al. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAEP. (2015). National assessment of educational progress: Nation’s report card. Washington, D. C.: Institute for Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/.

  • NAEP. (2017). National assessment of educational progress: Nation’s report card. Washington, D. C.: Institute for Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. M., & Machek, G. R. (2007). A survey of training, practice, and competence in reading assessment and intervention. School Psychology Review, 36(2), 311–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, R. E., White, A., & Swanson, H. L. (2007). Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Protopapas, A., Sideridis, G. D., Mouzaki, A., & Simos, P. G. (2011). Matthew effects in read- ing comprehension: Myth or reality? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 402–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Wightman, J. (1994). The role of phonology in young children’s learning of sight words: The direct mapping hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 42–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashotte, C. A., MacPhee, K., & Torgesen, J. K. (2001). Effectiveness of a group reading instruction program with poor readers in multiple grades. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 24, 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, K. D., & Goeke, J. L. (2006). Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham—Based reading instruction: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, L. R., & Solity, J. (2008). Delivering phonological and phonics training within whole-class teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 597–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the Self-Teaching Hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (2011). On the role of phonology in reading acquisition: The self-teaching hypothesis. In S. A. Brady, D. Braze, & C. A. Fowler (Eds.), Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence (pp. 45–68). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, E. J., Feagans, L., McKinney, J. D., & Appelbaum, M. I. (1986). Longitudinaly stability of LD subtypes based on age- and IQ-achievement discrepancies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 214–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simos, P. G., Fletcher, J. M., Bergman, E., Breier, J. I., Foorman, B. R., Castillo, E. M., et al. (2002). Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training. Neurology, 58, 1203–1213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 290–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. B. (1965). American reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. A. (1999). Different strokes for different folks: A critique of learning styles. American Educator, Fall, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. A., & Kuhn, M. R. (1995). Does whole language or instruction matched to learning styles help children learn to read? School Psychology Review, 24(3), 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 24–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, M. S., Stormont, M., Lembke, E. S., Wilson, D. J., & Clippard, D. (2012). Monitoring the effectiveness of the Wilson reading system for students with disabilities: One district’s example. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 20(1), 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, E. A., Walker, M. A., & Vaughn, S. (2017). The effects of reading fluency interventions on the reading fluency and reading comprehension performance of elementary students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the research from 2001 to 2014. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(5), 576–590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, M., Masterson, J., & Dixon, M. (2000). Spongelike acquisition of sight vocabulary in beginning readers? Journal of Research in Reading, 23(1), 12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suggate, S. P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 77–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment registers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K. (2004). Lessons learned from the last 20 years of research on interventions for students who experience difficulty learning to read. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 355–382). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K. (2005). Recent discoveries on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 521–537). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading, disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33–58, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Alexander, A., Alexander, J., & MacPhee, K. (2003). Progress toward understanding the instructional conditions necessary for remediating reading difficulties in older children. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 275–297). Baltimore, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J., Schirm, A., Castner, L., Vartivarian, S., Mansfield, W., Myers, D. Stancavage, F. Durno, D., Javorsky, R., & Haan, C. (2007). National assessment of title I final report volume II: Closing the reading gap: Findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers (NCEE 2008-4013). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Herron, J., & Lindamood, P. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 40–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truch, S. (1994). Stimulating basic reading processes using auditory discrimination in depth. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 60–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Truch, S. (2003). Comparing remedial outcomes using LIPS and Phono-Graphix: An in-depth look from a clinical perspective. Unpublished manuscript. Reading Foundation, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Available at http://readingfoundation.com/articles/.

  • Truch, S. (2004). Remedial outcomes with different reading programs. Paper presented at the International Dyslexia Association Conference, San Diego, CA. Available at http://readingfoundation.com/articles/.

  • Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Wanzek, J., Fletcher, J. M., … Francis, D. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Leroux, A., Roberts, G., Denton, C., Barth, A., et al. (2012). Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 515–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N. K., Metz, K., Murray, C. S., Roberts, G., et al. (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after grade 3. Review of Educational Research, 83(2), 163–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M., & Reutebuch, C. K. (2008). A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 317–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., & Denton, C. A. (2010). The efficacy of repeated reading and wide reading practice for high school students with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(1), 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, A. J., Lewis, E., Smith, F., Rowland, E., & Tweedie, W. (2001). Coloured overlays and their benefit for reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 24(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, B. W., Ring, J., & Olson, R. K. (1999). Training phonological awareness with and without explicit attention to articulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 271–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State University of New York College at Cortland, Cortland, NY, USA

    David A. Kilpatrick

  2. School Psychologist (retired), Iron River, WI, USA

    Shawn O’Brien

Authors
  1. David A. Kilpatrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shawn O’Brien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Kilpatrick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. State University of New York, College at Cortland, Cortland, NY, USA

    David A. Kilpatrick

  2. College of Education and Human Development, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    R. Malatesha Joshi

  3. Department of Psychology, Florida State University Florida Center for Reading Research, Tallahassee, FL, USA

    Richard K. Wagner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kilpatrick, D.A., O’Brien, S. (2019). Effective Prevention and Intervention for Word-Level Reading Difficulties. In: Kilpatrick, D., Joshi, R., Wagner, R. (eds) Reading Development and Difficulties. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26550-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation