Abstract
Adequate functionality and utilization of transportation infrastructure is critical to national development of a country. In view of this, South Africa’s National Development Plan is set out to ensure that all transport facilities are functional and utilized by 2030. However, stakeholders reject some public transportation infrastructure projects or facilities across the nation thereby causing traffic and economic growth related problems. This paper has examined the geometric parameters of Mangaung Intermodal Transport Facility and the influence of planning and design factors on stakeholders’ acceptance of public transport infrastructure. Physical observations and measurements of geometric parameters of case study facility as well as stakeholders’ interview are used to obtain geometric parameters and stakeholders opinions. The geometric parameters are analysed using relevant empirical models while content analysis is used to understand the various interviews conducted. The results show that minimum turning radii, driveway width, parking bays size, proximity to trip ends, community need for a transport facility and parking facility size are function of stakeholders’ acceptance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Buhr, W.: What is Infrastructure? Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge (107-03) (2003)
Janusova, L., Cicmancova, S.: Improving safety of transportation by using intelligent transport systems. Procedia Eng. 134, 14–22 (2016)
Matebesi, S.Z.: Insurgent Citizenship and Sustained Resistance of a Local Taxi Association1. Narrating the Everyday: Windows on Life in Central South Africa, p. 420 (2018)
Nwanna, C.R.: Right to the city: lagos, an emerging revanchist city in Nigeria?. Adv. Soc. Sci. Res. J. 5(4), 1–50 (2018)
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Qian, N.: On the Road: Access to Transportation Infra-structure and Economic Growth in China, No. w17897, National Bureau of Economic Research (2012)
Pradhan, R.P., Bagchi, T.P.: Effect of transportation infrastructure on economic growth in India: the VECM approach. Res. Transp. Econ. 38(1), 139–148 (2013)
Glaeser, E.L., Ponzetto, G.A.: The political economy of transportation investment. Econ. Transp. 13, 4–26 (2018)
Abuzeinab, A., Arif, M.: Stakeholder engagement: a green business model indicator. Procedia Econ. Finance. 18, 505–512 (2014)
Oyedele, O.A.: The challenges of infrastructure development in democratic governance. Constr. Econ. Manage. 1(6119), 1–15 (2012)
Bourne, L.: Targeted communication: the key to effective stakeholder engagement. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 226, 431–438 (2016)
Tengan, C., Aigbavboa, C.: Level of stakeholder engagement and participation in monitoring and evaluation of construction projects in Ghana. Procedia Eng. 196, 630–637 (2017)
Woltjer, J.: The’ public support machine’: notions of the function of participatory planning by Dutch infrastructure planners. Plann. Pract. Res. 17(4), 437–453 (2002)
Beecher, N., Harrison, E., Goldstein, N., McDaniel, M., Field, P., Susskind, L.: Risk perception, risk communication, and stakeholder involvement for biosolids management and research. J. Environ. Qual. 34(1), 122–128 (2005)
Kumar, G., Amandeep, K., Singh, K.K.: Public transport and urban mobility: perception of people on services of public transport in Bathinda City, Punjab, India. Int. Res. J. Soc. Sci. 3(12), 8–14 (2014)
Huang, L., Duan, B., Bi, J., Yuan, Z., Ban, J.: Analysis of determining factors of the public’s risk acceptance level in China. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J. 16(2), 365–379 (2010)
Cohen, J.J., Reichl, J., Schmidthaler, M.: Re-focusing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: a critical review. Energy 76, 4–9 (2014)
Anderson, C.: The networked minority: how a small group prevailed in a local windfarm conflict. Energy Policy 58, 97–108 (2013)
Das, D.K.: Influence of Administrative and Political Authorities’ Decisions on the Construction of Community Development Projects in India (2017)
Belwal, R., Belwal, S.: Public transportation services in Oman: a study of public perceptions. J. Public Transp. 13(4), 1 (2010)
South African National Road Agency Limited: Design Guidelines for Single Carriageway National Roads (2009)
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research: Geometric Design and Layout Planning (2009)
Roess, R.P., Prassas, E.S., McShane, W.R.: Traffic Engineering, 4th Edn. (2011)
Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., Winner, H.: Autonomous Driving, vol. 10, pp. 978–1003. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)
Lu, H., Burge, P., Heywood, C., Sheldon, R., Lee, P., Barber, K., Phillips, A.: The impact of real-time information on passengers’ value of bus waiting time. Transp. Res. Procedia 31, 18–34 (2018)
Fan, Y., Guthrie, A., Levinson, D.: Waiting time perceptions at transit stops and stations: effects of basic amenities, gender, and security. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 88, 251–264 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Azege, I.S., Das, D.K., Awuzie, B. (2020). Identification of Planning and Design Factors Influencing Stakeholders’ Acceptance of Public Transport Facility. In: Aigbavboa, C., Thwala, W. (eds) The Construction Industry in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. CIDB 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26528-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26528-1_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26527-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26528-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)