Skip to main content

Identification of Planning and Design Factors Influencing Stakeholders’ Acceptance of Public Transport Facility

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Construction Industry in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (CIDB 2019)

Abstract

Adequate functionality and utilization of transportation infrastructure is critical to national development of a country. In view of this, South Africa’s National Development Plan is set out to ensure that all transport facilities are functional and utilized by 2030. However, stakeholders reject some public transportation infrastructure projects or facilities across the nation thereby causing traffic and economic growth related problems. This paper has examined the geometric parameters of Mangaung Intermodal Transport Facility and the influence of planning and design factors on stakeholders’ acceptance of public transport infrastructure. Physical observations and measurements of geometric parameters of case study facility as well as stakeholders’ interview are used to obtain geometric parameters and stakeholders opinions. The geometric parameters are analysed using relevant empirical models while content analysis is used to understand the various interviews conducted. The results show that minimum turning radii, driveway width, parking bays size, proximity to trip ends, community need for a transport facility and parking facility size are function of stakeholders’ acceptance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Buhr, W.: What is Infrastructure? Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge (107-03) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Janusova, L., Cicmancova, S.: Improving safety of transportation by using intelligent transport systems. Procedia Eng. 134, 14–22 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Matebesi, S.Z.: Insurgent Citizenship and Sustained Resistance of a Local Taxi Association1. Narrating the Everyday: Windows on Life in Central South Africa, p. 420 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nwanna, C.R.: Right to the city: lagos, an emerging revanchist city in Nigeria?. Adv. Soc. Sci. Res. J. 5(4), 1–50 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Qian, N.: On the Road: Access to Transportation Infra-structure and Economic Growth in China, No. w17897, National Bureau of Economic Research (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pradhan, R.P., Bagchi, T.P.: Effect of transportation infrastructure on economic growth in India: the VECM approach. Res. Transp. Econ. 38(1), 139–148 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glaeser, E.L., Ponzetto, G.A.: The political economy of transportation investment. Econ. Transp. 13, 4–26 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abuzeinab, A., Arif, M.: Stakeholder engagement: a green business model indicator. Procedia Econ. Finance. 18, 505–512 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oyedele, O.A.: The challenges of infrastructure development in democratic governance. Constr. Econ. Manage. 1(6119), 1–15 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bourne, L.: Targeted communication: the key to effective stakeholder engagement. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 226, 431–438 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tengan, C., Aigbavboa, C.: Level of stakeholder engagement and participation in monitoring and evaluation of construction projects in Ghana. Procedia Eng. 196, 630–637 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Woltjer, J.: The’ public support machine’: notions of the function of participatory planning by Dutch infrastructure planners. Plann. Pract. Res. 17(4), 437–453 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beecher, N., Harrison, E., Goldstein, N., McDaniel, M., Field, P., Susskind, L.: Risk perception, risk communication, and stakeholder involvement for biosolids management and research. J. Environ. Qual. 34(1), 122–128 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar, G., Amandeep, K., Singh, K.K.: Public transport and urban mobility: perception of people on services of public transport in Bathinda City, Punjab, India. Int. Res. J. Soc. Sci. 3(12), 8–14 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, L., Duan, B., Bi, J., Yuan, Z., Ban, J.: Analysis of determining factors of the public’s risk acceptance level in China. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J. 16(2), 365–379 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen, J.J., Reichl, J., Schmidthaler, M.: Re-focusing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: a critical review. Energy 76, 4–9 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson, C.: The networked minority: how a small group prevailed in a local windfarm conflict. Energy Policy 58, 97–108 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Das, D.K.: Influence of Administrative and Political Authorities’ Decisions on the Construction of Community Development Projects in India (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Belwal, R., Belwal, S.: Public transportation services in Oman: a study of public perceptions. J. Public Transp. 13(4), 1 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. South African National Road Agency Limited: Design Guidelines for Single Carriageway National Roads (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research: Geometric Design and Layout Planning (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roess, R.P., Prassas, E.S., McShane, W.R.: Traffic Engineering, 4th Edn. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., Winner, H.: Autonomous Driving, vol. 10, pp. 978–1003. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lu, H., Burge, P., Heywood, C., Sheldon, R., Lee, P., Barber, K., Phillips, A.: The impact of real-time information on passengers’ value of bus waiting time. Transp. Res. Procedia 31, 18–34 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fan, Y., Guthrie, A., Levinson, D.: Waiting time perceptions at transit stops and stations: effects of basic amenities, gender, and security. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 88, 251–264 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Innocent Shima Azege .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Azege, I.S., Das, D.K., Awuzie, B. (2020). Identification of Planning and Design Factors Influencing Stakeholders’ Acceptance of Public Transport Facility. In: Aigbavboa, C., Thwala, W. (eds) The Construction Industry in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. CIDB 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26528-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26528-1_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26527-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26528-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics