Skip to main content

How Knowledge About Drugs Is Produced in Cryptomarkets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Darknet and Smarter Crime

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Cybercrime and Cybersecurity ((PSCYBER))

  • 1136 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter develops the theme of faith being put in technology over community to consider the differences between automatic trust systems and users’ and vendors’ own judgements when it comes to drug quality. The chapter explores the different kinds of knowledge that are employed to assess and ensure drug quality. Some of this knowledge can be reflected in published market ratings but much has to be developed and shared between users. Drug quality is not a single attribute that can be measured by one metric. It is a multivariate element that changes depending on the purpose for which it is being used and the context in which it is being taken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Coomber, R. (1997a). Dangerous drug adulteration—An international survey of drug dealers using the internet and the World Wide Web (WWW). International Journal on Drug Policy, 8, 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coomber, R. (1997b). The adulteration of drugs: What dealers do to illicit drugs, and what they think is done to them. Addiction Research and Theory, 5(4), 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decorte, T. (2001). Quality control by cocaine users: Underdeveloped harm reduction strategies. European Addiction Research, 7(4), 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DoctorX. (2019). Use and abuse of drug checking by cryptomarkets vendors. International Energy Control. Retrieved 17 April 2019, from https://energycontrol-international.org/use-and-abuse-of-drug-checking-by-cryptomarkets-vendors/.

  • Du Toit, B. (1977). Drugs, rituals and altered states of consciousness. Rotterdam: AA Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grund, J. P. C. (1993). Drug use as a social ritual. Rotterdam: Instituut voor Verslavingsonderzoek, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • KĂĽcklich, J. (2005). Precarious playbour: Modders and the digital games industry. Fibreculture, 5(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (2006). The pharmaceutical person. BioSocieties, 1(3), 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, S. G. (2013). Habitus and drug using environments: Health, place and lived-experience. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate. https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781409464938.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angus Bancroft .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bancroft, A. (2020). How Knowledge About Drugs Is Produced in Cryptomarkets. In: The Darknet and Smarter Crime. Palgrave Studies in Cybercrime and Cybersecurity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26512-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26512-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26511-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26512-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics