Abstract
Unit self-diagnosis is considered at system level. As distinct from system level self-diagnosis based on units mutual tests, we have researched the method based on the tests which a unit performs on other system units. Taking into account the obtained test results, a unit evaluates its own state. In our research, we have considered different faulty assumptions and testing procedures. Diagnosis model was developed and analyzed. Computer simulation is performed by using the web application developed for this research. Results of simulation were analyzed and assessed. Some recommendations were made for achieving better diagnosis results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Preparata T, Metze G, Chien R (1967) On the connection assignment problem of diagnosable system. IEEE Trans Electron Comput EC–16(12):848–854
Mashkov V, Barabash O (1998) Self-checking and self-diagnosis of module systems on the principle of walking diagnostic kernel. Eng Simul 15:43–51
Mashkov V (2011) New approach to system level self-diagnosis. In: Proceedings of IEEE 11th international conference on computer and information technology, CIT 2011, Cyprus, pp 579–584
Mashkov V, Lytvynenko V (2019) Method for unit self-diagnosis at system level. Int J Intell Syst Appl (IJISA) 11(1):1–12
Chen J, Kher S, Somani A (2006) Distributed fault detection of wireless sensor network. In: Proceedings of the international conference on mobile computing and networking, New York, USA, pp 65–72
Jiang P (2009) A new method for fault detection in wireless sensor neworks. In: Proceeding, Hangzhou Dianzi Unversity, ISSN 1424-8220
Jangale S, Hadsul D (2013) Detection of faulty sensor nodes in wireless sensor network. Comput Technol Appl 4(1):150–154
Lee MH, Choi YH (2008) Fault detection on wireless sensor networks. Comput Commun 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2008.06.014
Chessa S, Santi P (2001) Comparison-based system-level fault diagnosis in ad hoc network. In: 20th symposium on reliable distributed systems, pp 257–266
Albini L, Duarte J, Ziwich R (2005) A generalized model for distributed comparison-based system-level diagnosis. J Brazil Comput Soc 10(3):44–56
Collet J, Zajac P, Psarakis M, Gizopoulos D (2011) Chip self-organization and fault-tolerance in massively defective multicore arrays. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 8(2):207–217
Xu J (1991) The t/(n-1) diagnosability and its application to fault tolerance. Technical report, series No. 340, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Mashkov V, Pokorny J (2007) Scheme for comparing results of diverse software versions. In: Proceedings of ICSOFT Conference, Barcelona, Spain, pp 341–344
Ding M, Chen D, Xing K, Cheng X (2005) Localized fault-tolerant event boundary detection in sensor networks. In: IEEE Infocom, pp 902–913
Elhadef M, Boukerche A, Elkadiki H (2006) Performance analysis of a distributed comparison-based self-diagnosis protocol for wireless ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM international symposium on modeling analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems, pp 165–172
Khilar PM (2010) Performance analysis of distributed intermittent fault diagnosis in wireless networks using clustering. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on industrial and information systems, ICIIS, pp 13–18
Krishnamachari B, Iyengar S (2004) Distributed Bayesian algorithms for fault-tolerant event region detection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Comput 53(3):241–250
Luo X, Dong M, Huang Y (2006) On distributed fault-tolerant detection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Comput 55(1):58–70
Blount ML (1977) Probabilistic treatment of diagnosis in digital systems. In: 7th IEEE international symposium on fault-tolerant computing, pp 72–77
Mallela S, Masson G (1978) Diagnosable systems for intermittent faults. IEEE Trans Comput C–27(6):560–566
PNsimulator. http://vtan.ujep.cz/PNsimulator
Ciardo G, Muppala J, Trivedi K (1989) SPNP: Stochastic Petri Net Package. In: Proceedings of 3rd international workshop on Petri Nets and performance models, Japan, pp 142–150
Wang Z, Zhang J, Zhang Y (2012) Bayes-based fault discrimination in wide area backup protection. Adv Electr Comput Eng 12(1):91–96. https://doi.org/10.4316/AECE.2012.01015
Mashkov V (2005) Task allocation among agents of restricted alliance. In: Proceedings of IASTED ISC 2005 conference, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp 13–18
Mashkov V (2004) Restricted alliance and coalitions formation. In: Proceedings of IEEE WICACM international conference on intelligent agent technology, Beijing, China, pp 329–332
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mashkov, V., Bicanek, J., Bardachov, Y., Voronenko, M. (2020). Unconventional Approach to Unit Self-diagnosis. In: Lytvynenko, V., Babichev, S., Wójcik, W., Vynokurova, O., Vyshemyrskaya, S., Radetskaya, S. (eds) Lecture Notes in Computational Intelligence and Decision Making. ISDMCI 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1020. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26474-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26474-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26473-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26474-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)