Abstract
Chapter 1 serves as the introduction to the manuscript. The chapter lays a foundation for the discussion of the three localization processes advanced in the book: linguistic localization, subversive localization, and user-heuristic localization. Chapters 5, 6, and 7 fully develop these concepts, respectively. Ultimately, the author argues that these three processes help to capture users as heroes who shape, redesign, and localize an available technology for their need. The chapter also discusses the subject of the book: user localization strategies, the aims of the book, the audience, significance, and the major questions that drive the project.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agboka, G. Y. (2013). Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.730966.
Baneseh, M. A. (2015). Pink sheet: The story of Ghana’s presidential election as told in the Daily Graphic. Accra: G-Pak Limited.
Barton, B. F., & Barton, M. S. (2004). Ideology and the map: Toward a postmodern visual design practice. In J. S. Johnson-Eilola & S. A. Selber (Eds.), Central works in technical communication (pp. 232–252). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bazerman, C. (1998). The production of technology and the production of human meaning. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12, 381–387.
Blyler, N. (1998). Taking a political turn: The critical perspective and research in professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7(1), 33–52.
Bowdon, M. (2004). Technical communication and the role of the public intellectual: A community HIV-prevention case study. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1303_6.
Brady, A. (2004). Rhetorical research: Toward a user-centered approach. Rhetoric Review, 23(1), 57–74.
Colman, J. (2015). Wicked ambiguity and user experience. Retrieved from http://www.jonathoncolman.org/2015/05/21/wicked-ambiguity/#video.
Ding, H., & Savage, G. (2013). Guest editors’ introduction: New directions in intercultural professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 1–9.
Dobrin, D. (2004). What’s technical about technical writing. In J. S. Johnson-Eilola & S. A. Selber (Eds.), Central works in technical communication (pp. 107–123). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dorpenyo, I., & Agboka, G. (2018). Technical communication and election technologies. Technical Communication, 65(4), 349–352.
Douglas, T. (2017). To design better tech, understand context. TEDGlobal 2017. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/tania_douglas_to_design_better_tech_understand_context/transcript?language=en#t-503002.
Dourish, P. (2003). The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents. Computer Supported Cooperation Work, 12, 465–490.
Dubinsky, J. M. (2004). Guest editor’s introduction. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(3), 245–249.
Durao, R. (2013). International professional communication: An overview. Connexions: International Professional Communication Journal, 1(1), 1–24.
Esselink, B. (2000). A practical guide to localization (Vol. 4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Fukuoka, W., Kojima, Y., & Spyridakis, J. H. (1999). Illustrations in user manuals: Preference and effectiveness with Japanese and American readers. Technical Communication, 46(2), 167–176.
Gonzales, L. (2018). Sites of translation: What multilinguals can teach us about digital writing and rhetoric. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Gonzales, L., & Zantjer, R. (2015). Translation as a user-localization practice. Technical Communication, 62(4), 271–284.
Haas, A. M. (2012). Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 277–310.
Hobbis, S. K., & Hobbis, G. (2017). Voter integrity, trust and the promise of digital technologies: Biometric voter registration in Solomon Islands. Paper presented at the Anthropological Forum.
Hoft, N. L. (1995). International technical communication: How to export information about high technology. New York, NY: Wiley.
Johnson, R. (1998). User centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany: State University of New York.
Jones, N. N. (2016). Narrative inquiry in human-centered design: Examining silence and voice to promote social justice in design scenarios. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653489.
José, L. (2017). User-centered design and normative practices: The Brexit vote as a technical communication failure. Paper presented at the Association of Teachers of Technical Writing—Twentieth Annual Conference, Portland, OR.
Katz, S. B. (1992). The ethic of expediency: Classical rhetoric, technology, and the Holocaust. College English, 54(3), 255–275.
Kimball, M. A. (2006). Cars, culture, and tactical technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 67–86.
Kimball, M. A. (2017). Tactical technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2017.1259428.
Kitalong, K. S. (2000). “You will”: Technology, magic, and the cultural contexts of technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14(3), 289–314.
Longo, B. (2000). Spurious coin: A history of science, management, and technical writing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Longo, B., & Fountain, K. (2013). What can history teach us about technical communication? In J. Johnson-Eilola & S. A. Selber (Eds.), Solving problems in technical communication (pp. 165–186). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
McKeon, R. (2009). The basic works of Aristotle. New York: Random House LLC.
Miller, C. R. (1994). Opportunity, opportunism, and progress: Kairos in the rhetoric of technology. Argumentation, 8(1), 81–96.
Paradis, J. (2004). Text and action: The operator’s manual in context and in court. In J. S. Johnson-Eilola & S. A. Selber (Eds.), Central works in technical communication (pp. 365–380). New York: Oxford University Press.
Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group: Ghana Presidential and Parliamentary Elections. (2013). Retrieved from London. http://thecommonwealth.org/sites/default/files/inline/GhanaElections-FinalReport2012.pdf.
Rose, E. J. (2016). Design as advocacy: Using a human-centered approach to investigate the needs of vulnerable populations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653494.
Roy, D. (2013). Toward experience design: The changing face of technical communication. Connexions: International Professional Communication Journal, 1(1), 111–118.
Rude, C. D. (2009). Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(2), 174–215.
Rutter, R. (1991). History, rhetoric, and humanism: Toward a more comprehensive definition of technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 21(2), 133–153.
Salvo, M. J. (2001). Ethics of engagement: User-centered design and rhetorical methodology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10(3), 273–290.
Sapp, D. A., Savage, G., & Mattson, K. (2013). After the International Bill of Human Rights (IBHR): Introduction to special issue on human rights and professional communication. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 14(1), 1–12.
Scott, B. (2003). Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Seigel, M. (2013). The rhetoric of pregnancy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Simmons, W. M., & Grabill, J. T. (2007). Toward a civic rhetoric for technologically and scientifically complex places: Invention, performance, and participation. College Composition and Communication, 58(3), 419–448.
Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sun, H. (2004). Expanding the scope of localization: A cultural usability perspective on mobile text messaging use in American and Chinese contexts. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Sun, H. (2006). The triumph of users: Achieving cultural usability goals with user localization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1504_3.
Sun, H. (2009a). Designing for a dialogic view of interpretation in cross-cultural IT design. In N. Aykin (Ed.), Internationalization, design and global development (pp. 108–116). Heidelberg: Springer.
Sun, H. (2009b). Toward a rhetoric of locale: Localizing mobile messaging technology into everyday life. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 39(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.39.3.c.
Sun, H. (2012). Cross-cultural technology design: Creating culture-sensitive technology for local users. New York: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, D. (1992). Global software: Developing applications for the international market. New York: Springer.
Thayer, A., & Kolko, B. E. (2004). Localization of digital games: The process of blending for the global games market. Technical Communication, 51(4), 477–488.
van Reijswoud, V., & de Jager, A. (2011). The role of appropriate ICT in bridging the digital divide. In K. St. Amant & B. A. Olaniran (Eds.), Globalization and the digital divide. Amherst: Cambria Press.
Walton, R. (2013a). Civic engagement, information technology, & global contexts. Connexions: An International Professional Communication Journal, 1(1), 147–154.
Walton, R. (2013b). How trust and credibility affect technology-based development projects. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 85–102.
Walton, R. (2016). Supporting human dignity and human rights: A call to adopt the first principle of human-centered design. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 402–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653496.
Whitney, J. G. (2013). The 2010 citizens clean elections voter education guide: Constructing the “Illegal Immigrant” in the Arizona voter. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 43(4), 437–455.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dorpenyo, I.K. (2020). Recovering the Lost Voices of Users in Localization. In: User Localization Strategies in the Face of Technological Breakdown. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26399-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26399-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26398-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26399-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)