Skip to main content

Is Quality Good Enough for Out-of-Home Care Children? Early Childhood Education and Care Experiences of Australian Children in Out-of-Home Care at Age 3 to 5 Years

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research ((CHIR,volume 22))

Abstract

High quality early childhood education and care (ECEC) from age 3 may promote early learning, reduce vulnerability and narrow achievement gaps between children in care and their peers. Children from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds have lower rates of participation in a formal early childhood program than children generally. However, little is known about the rate of ECEC attendance among children in out-of-home care (OHC); the type, amount and quality of service they experience as well as the factors that may create a barrier to access. This chapter reviews the available research on these issues and reports findings on the ECEC experiences of N = 60 children aged 3 to 5 years from the Australian Early Childhood in Foster and Kinship Care study.

Results showed that study children were just as likely as other children to be attending ECEC, and the amount of ECEC study children were using was similar as well. Yet, compared to children generally, a slightly lower proportion of study children spent time in a preschool program, and a smaller proportion of study children’s main ECEC service was meeting the National Quality Standard. While ECEC subsidies and cross-sector collaborations appear to support strong ECEC participation, more research is needed to determine whether universal ECEC meets the unique needs of children in OHC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Replaced the Child Care Benefit (CCB) and Child Care Rebate (CCR).

  2. 2.

    Child care types included a list of ten response options; do not use child care, long day care centre, family day care, occasional care, gym, leisure or community centre, workplace crèche, JET (Job Education Training) crèche, mobile care unit, approved in-home care and regulated child care. Preschool types included; preschool.

  3. 3.

    n = 5 in current sample.

  4. 4.

    Gym, leisure or community centre.

  5. 5.

    Includes children who used another form of ECEC and children who did not attend ECEC.

  6. 6.

    Calculated as time usually attends ECEC.

  7. 7.

    The proportion of children attending preschool for 15+ h per week was 75%, calculated using a reference period, which in part will relate to strict policies for keeping children at home when ill.

  8. 8.

    Such as the Grandparent Child Care Benefit (GCCB) and Special Child Care Benefit (SCCB) that were available at the time of data collection and currently available under the Additional Child Care Subsidy scheme.

  9. 9.

    For example, whether ECEC placement is sustained when child moves placement or is returned home.

References

  • ABS. (2015). 4402.0 – Childhood education and care, Australia, June 2014. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4402.0June%202014?OpenDocument. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • ABS. (2018). 4402.0 – Childhood education and care, Australia, June 2017. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs%40.nsf/mediareleasesbyCatalogue/B80CB3BDAC6944AECA257601001B62F7. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • ACECQA. (2016). NQF snapshot Q4 2015. A quarterly report from the Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority.https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/acecqa/files/Reports/2015/NQFSnapshotQ4_2015_2.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • AIHW. (2018). Child protection Australia 2016–17 (Child Welfare Series No. 66. Cat. No. CWS 60). Canberra, Australia: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anda, R. F., Felitti, V. J., & Bremner, J. D. (2006). The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood: A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 256, 174–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Family Studies, Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago, & New South Wales Department of Family and Community Services. (2015). Pathways of care longitudinal study: Outcomes of children and young people in out-of-home care in NSW. Wave 1 Baseline statistical report. Sydney, Australia: N.S.W. Department of Family and Community Services. http://www.community.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/file/0004/335866/pathways_of_care _research_report.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • Barnett, W. S. (1998). Long-term cognitive and academic effects of early childhood education on children in poverty. Preventive Medicine, 27(2), 204–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D., Blair, C., Willoughby, M., Garrett-Peters, P., Vernon-Feagans, L., et al. (2016). Household chaos and children’s cognitive and socio-emotional development in early childhood: Does child care quality play a buffering role? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 34, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, N., & Seth-Purdie, R. (2013). Development risk exposure and participation in early childhood education: How can we reach the most vulnerable children? HC Coombs Policy Forum, Australian National University. https://coombsforum.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/uploads/coombs_forum_crawford_anu_edu_au/2014–02/early-childhood-participation-final.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • Cloney, D., Cleveland, G., Hattie, J., & Tayler, C. (2015). Variations in the availability and quality of early childhood education and care by socioeconomic status. Early Education and Development, 27(3), 384–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinehart, L., Manfra, L., Katz, L., & Hartman, S. (2012). Associations between centerbased care accreditation status and the early educational outcomes of children in the welfare system. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1072–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, C., & Lefranc, A. (2010). Early schooling and later outcomes: Evidence from preschool extension in France. France: Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications (THEMA), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, T., Tayler, C., Niklas, F., & Cloney, D. S. (2015). Too late and not enough for some children: Early childhood education and care (ECEC) program usage patterns in the years before school in Australia. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 9(9), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. (2016). Promising evidence regarding the benefits of early care and education for children in the child welfare system (OPRE Report # 2016–68). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovan, N., Mishra, S., Susman-Stillman, A., Piescher, K. N., & LaLiberte, T. (2014). Differences in the early care and education needs of young children involved in child protection. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leseman, P. (2002). Early childhood education and care for children from low-income or minority backgrounds. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leseman, P. (2009). The impact of high quality education and care on the development of young children: Review of the literature. In European Commision (Ed.), Early childhood education and care in Europe: Tackling social and cultural inequalities (pp. 17–50). Brussels, Belgium: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency P9 Eurydice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipscomb, S., Schmitt, S., Pratt, M., Acock, A., & Pears, K. (2014). Living in non-parental care moderates effects of prekindergarten experiences on externalizing behaviour problems in school. Children and Youth Services Review, 40, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipscomb, S. T., & Pears, K. C. (2011). Patterns and predictors of early care and education for children in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 2303–2311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipscomb, S. T., Pratt, M. E., Schmitt, S. A., Pears, K. C., & Kim, H. K. (2013). School readiness in children living in non-parental care: Impacts of head start. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S., Fuller, B., Kagan, S., & Carrol, B. (2004). Child care in poor communities: Early learning effects of type, quality and stability. Child Development, 75, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathers, S., Hardy, G., Clancy, C., Dixon, J., & Harding, C. (2016). Starting out right: Early education and looked after children. London: University of Oxford/Family and Child care Trust. https://www.familyandchildcaretrust.org/starting-out-right-early-education-and-looked-after-children-0. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • Melhuish, E., Ereky-Stevens, K., Petrogiannis, K., Ariescu, A., Penderi, E., Rentzou, K., et al. (2015). A review of research on the effects of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) upon child development. Care project; curriculum quality analysis and impact review of European Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC). http://ececcare.org/resources/publications/. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • Merritt, D. H., & Klein, S. (2015). Do early care and education services improve language development for maltreated children? Evidence from a national child welfare sample. Child Abuse and Neglect, 39, 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, J., & Barnett, M. (2016). The role of child care in supporting the emotion regulatory needs of maltreated infants and toddlers. Children and Youth Services Review, 64, 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, M., Fox, S., Hinz, B., & Cole, H. (2016). Quality early education for all. Fostering creative, entrepreneurial, resilient and capable learners (Mitchell Report No. 01/2016). Mitchell Institute, Melbourne, Australia. www.mitchellinstitute.org.au. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • Pears, K. C., Fisher, H. K., Bruce, J., Kim, P. A., & Yoerger, K. (2010). Early elementary school adjustment of maltreated children in foster care: The roles of inhibitory control and caregiver involvement. Child Development, 85(5), 1550–1564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pears, K. C., Heywood, C. V., Kim, H. K., & Fisher, P. A. (2011). Pre-reading deficits in children in foster care. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 140–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechtel, P., & Pizzagalli, D. (2010). Effects of early life stress on cognitive and affective function: An integrated review of human literature. Psychopharmacoloy, 214(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R., Barnett, W., Burchinal, M., & Thornburg, K. (2009). The effects of preschool education: What we know, how public policy is or is not aligned with the evidence base, and what we need to know. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10(2), 49–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, F., & Hayes, A. (2000). OECD thematic review of early childhood education and care policy (Australian Background Report). Canberra: Commonwealth Government of Australia. https://www.oecd.org/australia/1900259.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • Ringeisen, H., Casanueva, C., Smith, K., & Dolan, M. (2011). NSCAW II baseline report: Children’s services (OPRE Report # 2011-27f). Washington, DC: Office of Panning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, P. (2010). Does pre-school make a difference? Identifying the impact of pre-school on children’s cognitive and social behavioural development at different ages. In K. Sylva, E. Melhuish, P. Sammons, I. Siraj-Blatchford & B. Taggart (Eds.), Early childhood matters: Evidence from the effective pre-school and primary education project (pp. 92–113). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision. (2016). Report on government services 2016, vol. B, Child Care, Education and Training. Canberra: Productivity Commission. http://www.pc.gov.au/research/ongoing/report-ongovernment-services/2016/childcare-education-and-training/rogs-2016-volumebchild-care-education-and-training.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2004). The Effective Provision of Pre-school Education (EPPE) project: Findings from preschool to end of key stage 1. Nottingham, UK: Department for Education and Skills. http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3155&context=sspapers. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (Eds.). (2010). Early childhood matters: Evidence from the effective pre-school and primary education project. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayler, C. (2016). The E4Kids study: Assessing the effectiveness of Australian Early Childhood Education and Care Programs: Overview of findings at 2016 (Final report to the Partner Organisations of the Effective Early Educational Experiences (E4Kids) Study). https://education.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/2929452/E4KidsReport-3.0_WEB.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

  • Vandell, D., Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., Steinberg, L., & Vandergrift, N. (2010). Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. Child Development, 81(3), 737–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroeck, M., & Lazzari, A. (2014). Accessibility of early childhood education and care: A state of affairs. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22(3), 327–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D., O’Connor, M., Smart, D., & Edwards, B. (2016). A critical review of the early childhood literature. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, S. (2018). Use of child care among Australian infants and toddlers in foster and kinship care. International Journal of Early Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-0180212-1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Wise .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wise, S. (2019). Is Quality Good Enough for Out-of-Home Care Children? Early Childhood Education and Care Experiences of Australian Children in Out-of-Home Care at Age 3 to 5 Years. In: McNamara, P., Montserrat, C., Wise, S. (eds) Education in Out-of-Home Care. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26372-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26372-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26371-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26372-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics