Abstract
Universities across the globe are ‘opening wide’ the doors of academe and students from increasingly diverse backgrounds are responding in their thousands. Despite the resulting increase in both student numbers and student diversity, particularly those who are the first in their families to attend university, many institutional support models continue to focus on how to ‘fill–up’ these learners with the requisite skills needed to succeed at university. However, such an approach implicitly assumes that the knowledges derived from a lived experience that does not include a family tradition of university attendance, is somehow at odds with achieving ‘success’ at university and, ultimately, employment after graduation. This chapter proposes an alternative strengths-based perspective that explores the capabilities and capitals that learners bring with them to the HE environment in order to counter such assumed deficit framing. By exploring the strengths, skills, knowledge and work ethic of first-generation students, we can begin to move away from the perception of these learners as being somehow ‘lacking’ and equally acknowledge the key role that family and friends may play in supporting them in various ways throughout their studies. Further, in acknowledging the knowledge, skills and experience that these diverse learners bring (including the resilience they likely already hold) this chapter foregrounds how students themselves can navigate this terrain and consider their post-graduation futures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bathmaker, A. (2015). Thinking with Bourdieu: Thinking after Bourdieu. Using ‘field’ to consider in/equalities in the changing field of English higher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(1), 61–80.
Beilin, I. (2016). Student success and the neoliberal academic library. Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1(1), 10–23.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–257). New York: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bowman, D. (2010). Sen and bourdieu: Understanding inequality. Retrieved from http://library.bsl.org.au/jspui/bitstream/1/2131/1/Bowman_Sen_and_Bourdieu_understanding_inequality_2010.pdf.
Burke, P. J., Hayton, A., & Stevenson, J. (2018). Evaluating equity and widening participation in higher education. UK: Trentham Books.
Clandinin, D. W., & Connelly, M. F. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. California: Jossey-Bass.
Collier, P. J., & Morgan, D. L. (2008). “Is that paper really due today?”: Differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education, 55, 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9065-5.
Daly, A., Lewis, P., Corliss, M., & Heaslip, T. (2015). The private rate of return to a university degree in Australia. Australian Journal of Education, 59, 97–112.
Friedman, S. (2014). The price of the ticket: Rethinking the experience of social mobility. Sociology, 48(2), 352–368.
Goldingay, S., Hitch, D., Ryan, J., Farrugia, D., Hosken, N., Lamaro, G., et al. (2014). “The university didn’t actually tell us this is what you have to do”: Social inclusion through embedding of academic skills in first year professional courses. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5, 43–53.
Kutty, F. M. (2014). Mapping their road to university: First-generation students’ choice and decision of university. International Education Studies, 7, 49–60.
Lehmann, W. (2007). “I just didn’t feel like I fit in”: The role of habitus in university drop-out decisions. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37(2), 89–110.
Lehmann, W. (2009). Becoming middle class: How working-class university students draw and transgress moral class boundaries. Sociology, 43(4), 631–647.
Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation in higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72, 413–434.
McKay, J., & Devlin, M. (2016). “Low income doesn’t mean stupid and destined for failure”: Challenging the deficit discourse around students from low SES backgrounds in higher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1079273.
Milburn, A. (2012). University challenge: How higher education can advance social mobility: A progress report by the independent reviewer on social mobility and child poverty. London: Cabinet Office.
Norton, A., & Cherastidtham, I. (2014). Mapping Australian higher education, 2014–15. Carlton: Grattan Institute.
Nyström, A., Jackson, C., & Salminen Karlsson, M. (2018). What counts as success? Constructions of achievement in prestigious higher education programmes. In Research Papers in Education, Online First. Available from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02671522.2018.1452964.
Opengart, R., & Short, D. C. (2002). Free agent learners: The new career model and its impact on human resource development. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21, 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370210127837.
O’Shea, S. (2017–2019). Capitals and capabilities: Rethinking higher education persistence. In Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP170100705).
O’Shea, S., & Delahunty, J. (2018). Getting through the day and still having a smile on my face! How do students define success in the university learning environment? Higher Education Research and Development, 37(5), 1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1463973.
O’Shea, S., May, J., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2017). First-in-family students, university experience and family life: Motivations, transitions and participation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
O’Shea, S., Stone, C., Delahunty, J., & May, J. (2018). Discourses of betterment and opportunity: Exploring the privileging of university attendance for first-in-family learners. Studies in Higher Education, 43(6), 1020–1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1212325.
Reay, D. (2013). Social mobility, a panacea for austere times: Tales of emperors, frogs, and tadpoles. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5–6), 660–677.
Reeves, A., Friedman, S., Rahal, C., & Flemmen, M. (2017). The decline and persistence of the old boy: Private schools and elite recruitment 1897 to 2016. American Sociological Review., 82, 1139–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417735742.
Sen, A. (1992). In equality re-examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Southgate, E., Brosnan, C., Lempp, H., Kelly, B., Wright, S., Outram, S., et al. (2017). Travels in extreme social mobility: How first in family students find their way into and through medical education. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 242–260.
Sullivan, P. (2008). 0PINIoN: Measuring “success” at open admissions institutions: Thinking carefully about this complex question. College English, 70(6), 618–630.
Yosso, T. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Shea, S., Delahunty, J. (2019). “That Working-Class Ethic … Where There’s a Will There’s a Way:” A Strengths-Based Approach to Developing Employable Scholars. In: Diver, A. (eds) Employability via Higher Education: Sustainability as Scholarship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26342-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26342-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26341-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26342-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)