Skip to main content

Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification with Synthetic Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11699))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Image semantic segmentation systems based on deep learning are prone to making erroneous predictions for images affected by uncertainty influence factors such as occlusions or inclement weather. Bayesian deep learning applies the Bayesian framework to deep models and allows estimating so-called epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties as part of the prediction. Such estimates can indicate the likelihood of prediction errors due to the influence factors. However, because of lack of data, the effectiveness of Bayesian uncertainty estimation when segmenting images with varying levels of influence factors has not yet been systematically studied. In this paper, we propose using a synthetic dataset to address this gap. We conduct two sets of experiments to investigate the influence of distance, occlusion, clouds, rain, and puddles on the estimated uncertainty in the segmentation of road scenes. The experiments confirm the expected correlation between the influence factors, the estimated uncertainty, and accuracy. Contrary to expectation, we also find that the estimated aleatoric uncertainty from Bayesian deep models can be reduced with more training data. We hope that these findings will help improve methods for assuring machine-learning-based systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., Adam, H.: Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In: Ferrari, V., Hebert, M., Sminchisescu, C., Weiss, Y. (eds.) ECCV 2018. LNCS, vol. 11211, pp. 833–851. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, L.C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., Adam, H.: Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pp. 801–818 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cordts, M., et al.: The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3213–3223 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Czarnecki, K., Salay, R.: Towards a framework to manage perceptual uncertainty for safe automated driving. In: Gallina, B., Skavhaug, A., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2018. LNCS, vol. 11094, pp. 439–445. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99229-7_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Depeweg, S., Hernandez-Lobato, J., Doshi-Velez, F., Udluft, S.: Decomposition of uncertainty in bayesian deep learning for efficient and risk-sensitive learning. In: 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2018, vol. 3, pp. 1920–1934 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. DeVries, T., Taylor, G.W.: Learning confidence for out-of-distribution detection in neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.04865 (2018)

  7. Gal, Y.: Uncertainty in deep learning (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gal, Y., Ghahramani, Z.: Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1050–1059 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., Weinberger, K.Q.: On calibration of modern neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 70, pp. 1321–1330. JMLR. org (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kendall, A., Badrinarayanan, V., Cipolla, R.: Bayesian segnet: Model uncertainty in deep convolutional encoder-decoder architectures for scene understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.02680 (2015)

  12. Kendall, A., Gal, Y.: What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5574–5584 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khan, S., Phan, B., Salay, R., Czarnecki, K.: Procsy: Procedural synthetic dataset generation towards influence factor studies of semantic segmentation networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (to appear, 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3431–3440 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, D., Nicholson, L., Dayoub, F., Sünderhauf, N.: Dropout sampling for robust object detection in open-set conditions. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mukhoti, J., Gal, Y.: Evaluating Bayesian deep learning methods for semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.12709 (2018)

  17. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., Sun, J.: Faster r-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 91–99 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tung, F., Chen, J., Meng, L., Little, J.J.: The raincouver scene parsing benchmark for self-driving in adverse weather and at night. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 2(4), 2188–2193 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu, F., et al.: BDD100K: a diverse driving video database with scalable annotation tooling. CoRR arXiv:1805.04687 (2018)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Buu Phan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Phan, B., Khan, S., Salay, R., Czarnecki, K. (2019). Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification with Synthetic Data. In: Romanovsky, A., Troubitsyna, E., Gashi, I., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26250-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26250-1_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26249-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26250-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics