Skip to main content

Combining GSN and STPA for Safety Arguments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2019)

Abstract

Dependability case, assurance case, or safety case is employed to explain why all critical hazards have been eliminated or adequately mitigated in mission-critical and safety-critical systems. Goal Structuring Notation (GSN) is the most employed graphical notation for documenting dependability cases. System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is a technique, based on System Theoretic Accidents Model and Process (STAMP), to identify hazardous control actions, scenarios, and causal factors. STPA is considered a rather complex technique, but there is a growing interest in using STPA in certifications of safety-critical systems development. We investigate how STAMP and STPA can be related to use of assurance cases. This is done in a generic way by representing the STPA steps as part of the evidence and claim documentations within GSN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 02 September 2019

    In the originally published version of this chapter there was an error in figure 2. This has been corrected.

References

  1. Kelly, T.: Arguing safety – a systematic approach to managing safety cases. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly, T., Weaver, R.: The goal structuring notation - a safety argument notation. In: Proceedings of the Dependable Systems and Networks Workshop on Assurance Cases (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leveson, N.: Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leveson, N., Thomas, J.: STPA Handbook (2018). https://psas.scripts.mit.edu/home/. Accessed 5 June 2019

  5. Thomas, J.: STPA in Industry Standards (2019). https://psas.scripts.mit.edu/home/2019-stamp-workshop-presentations/. Accessed 5 June 2019

  6. Rinehart, D., Knight, J., Rowanhill, J.: Current practices in constructing and evaluating assurance cases with applications to aviation. NASA/CR– 2015-218678 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Assurance Case Working Group: Goal Structuring Notation Community Standard (Version 2) (2018). https://scsc.uk/scsc-141B. Accessed 5 May 2019

  8. Rinehart, D., Knight, J., Rowanhill, J.: Understanding what it means for assurance cases to ‘work’. NASA/CR–2017-219582 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goodenough, J., Barry, M.: Evaluating Hazard Mitigations with Dependability Cases, AIAA 2009-1943, AIAA Infotech@Aerospace Conference. Seattle, Washington (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hugues, J., Delange, J.: Model-based design and automated validation of ARINC653 architectures using the AADL. In: Cyber-Physical System Design from an Architecture Analysis Viewpoint. Springer, Singapore (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Denney, E., Pai, G.: Tool support for assurance case development. Autom. Softw. Eng. 25(3), 435–499 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas, J.: Extending and automating a systems-theoretic hazard analysis for requirements generation and analysis (Doctoral dissertation, MIT) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly, J., McDermid, J.: Safety case construction and reuse using patterns. In: Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability and Security (SAFECOMP) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of the first author was supported by CNPq (grant numbers 403921/2016-3 and 306186/2018-7). The work of the second author was supported by the national projects on aeronautics (NFFP7-04890) and the research centre on Resilient Information and Control Systems (www.rics.se).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celso Hirata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hirata, C., Nadjm-Tehrani, S. (2019). Combining GSN and STPA for Safety Arguments. In: Romanovsky, A., Troubitsyna, E., Gashi, I., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26250-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26250-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26249-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26250-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics