Expertise and the Future

  • Fred Phillips
Part of the Science, Technology and Innovation Studies book series (STAIS)


This chapter explores whether “experts” can see the future better than ordinary persons. The chapter introduces the Leapfrog Theory of Scientific Advance, and that theory’s implications for the kinds of expertise that must be sought, and developed. It describes the accession of the knowledge economy, noting traditional capitalists’ resistance to this shift, and the further resistance due to traditions of anti-intellectualism. The tendency of experts to look for answers only within their field of expertise—known as “hypocognition”—is noted. The chapter closes by describing a large expert survey which concludes medical and computer sciences are expected to produce the most potential for scientific breakthroughs in the next 35 years.


  1. Betz UAK, Betz F, Kim R, Monks B, Phillips F (2019) Surveying the future of science, technology and business—a 35-year perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 144:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Drucker P (1994) Post-capitalist society. Harper Business, Reprint (Kindle) editionGoogle Scholar
  3. Hofstadter R (1963) Anti-intellectualism in American Life (3rd printing). KnopfGoogle Scholar
  4. Learner DB, Phillips FY (1993) Method and progress in management science. Socio Econ Plan Sci 27(1):9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mauksch S, von der Gracht H, Gordon TJ (2019) The need and search for expertise in foresight. Technol Forecast Soc Chang, 50th Anniversary Special IssueGoogle Scholar
  6. Phillips F (2008) Change in socio-technical systems: researching the multis, the Biggers, and the more connecteds. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 75(5):721–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wu K, Dunning D (2018) Unknown unknowns: the problem of hypocognition. Scientific American,

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fred Phillips
    • 1
  1. 1.Anderson School of ManagementUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations