Abstract
This chapter considers a number of theories that help our understanding of the desistance process for those convicted of sexual offending; in particular, it contemplates how a faith or a religious context might serve as a mechanism to help foster a process of desistance. The chapter first briefly outlines the current rehabilitation landscape highlighting why there is a need to consider informal rehabilitation approaches such as those available in faith communities. Following this, the Good Lives Model (GLM) is presented and serves as a foundation to support the case that a religious context may help promote the desistance process for those convicted of sexual offending. Following this, a range of theories from the desistance literature is also included. In conclusion, when knitted together, GLM and desistance theories are strengthened and support the notion that informal structures (such as religious communities) ought to be capitalised upon and used in conjunction with formal risk management measures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andrews, D. A., & James, B. (2016). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Bandura, A. (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 12–29.
Beauregard, E., Rossmo, D. K., & Proulx, J. (2007). A descriptive model of the hunting process of serial sex offenders: A rational choice perspective. Journal of Family Violence, 22(6), 449–463.
Bell, K., Winder, B., & Blagden, N. (2018). ‘Better as a Buddhist’: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the reflections on the religious beliefs of Buddhist men serving a prison sentence for a sexual offence. Religions, 9(4), 101.
Bernasco, W., Johnson, S. D., & Ruiter, S. (2015). Learning where to offend: Effects of past on future burglary locations. Applied Geography, 60, 120–129.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Farrington, D. (1988). Criminal career research: Its value for criminology. Criminology, 26(1), 1–35.
Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice, 6, 147–185.
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25(4), 933–948.
Criminal Justice Act (c.44). (2003).
Criminal Justice Act (Sections 325 to 327). (2003).
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2017). How psychological dispositions influence the theology of the afterlife. In Y. Nagasawa & B. Matheson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the afterlife (pp. 435–453). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
DeMichele, M., & Payne, B. (2018). Taking officer time seriously: A study of the daily activities of probation officers. Probation Journal, 65(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550517748358.
Durkheim, E. (1951 [1897]). Suicide. New York: Free Press.
Farmer, M., McAlinden, A.-M., & Maruna, S. (2016). Sex offending and situational motivation: Findings from a qualitative analysis of desistance from sexual offending. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(15), 1756–1775.
Farrall, S., Bottoms, A., & Shapland, J. (2010). Social structures and desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 7(6), 546–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810376574.
Farrall, S., Hunter, B., Sharpe, G., & Calverley, A. (2014). Criminal careers in transition: The social context of desistance from crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flynn, N. (2011). Criminal behaviour in context: Space, place and desistance from crime. Oxon: Routledge.
Giordano, P. C. (2016). Mechanisms underlying the desistance process: Reflections on ‘a theory of cognitive transformation’. In J. Shapland, D. Farrington, & A. Bottoms (Eds.), Global perspectives on desistance (pp. 27–43). London: Routledge.
Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064. https://doi.org/10.1086/343191.
Giordano, P. C., Longmore, M. A., Schroeder, R. D., & Seffrin, P. M. (2008). A life-course perspective on spirituality and desistance from crime. Criminology, 46(1), 99–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00104.x.
Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61–139). New York: Elsevier.
Hallett, M., & McCoy, J. S. (2015). Religiously motivated desistance: An exploratory study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(8), 855–872.
Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2014). High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Retrieved from http://jiv.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/03/20/0886260514526062.abstract; https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514526062.
Hanson, R., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163.
Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K., Thornton, D., Babchishin, K. M., & Harris, A. J. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R and Static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(9), 1148–1171.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kewley, S., Beech, A. R., & Harkins, L. (2015). Examining the role of faith community groups with sexual offenders: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.016.
Kewley, S., Larkin, M., Harkins, L., & Beech, A. R. (2016). Restoring identity: The use of religion as a mechanism to transition between an identity of sexual offending to a non-offending identity. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 17(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895816654530.
Kewley, S., Larkin, M., Harkins, L., & Beech, A. R. (2018). Incarcerated child sexual offenders and the reinvention of self through religious and spiritual affiliation. In K. R. Kerley (Ed.), Finding freedom in confinement: The role of religion in prison life (pp. 366–394). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
King, S. (2013). Assisted desistance and experiences of probation supervision. Probation Journal, 60(2), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550513478320.
Kingston, S., & Thomas, T. (2018). The sexual risk order and the sexual harm prevention order: The first two years. Probation Journal, 65(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550517748359.
Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820000094481.
Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1–69.
Laws, D. R. (2003). The rise and fall of relapse prevention. Australian Psychologist, 38(1), 22–30.
Laws, D. R., & Ward, T. (2011). Desistance from sex offending: Alternatives to throwing away the keys. New York: Guilford Press.
Levenson, J., Ackerman, A. R., Socia, K. M., & Harris, A. J. (2015). Where for art thou? Transient sex offenders and residence restrictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(4), 319–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403413512326.
Levenson, J., D’Amora, D., & Hern, A. (2007). Megan’s Law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(4), 587–602.
Levenson, J. S., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community reentry. Justice Research and Policy, 9(1), 59–74.
Lussier, P., & Healey, J. (2009). Rediscovering Quetelet, again: The “aging” offender and the prediction of reoffending in a sample of adult sex offenders. Justice Quarterly, 26(4), 827–856.
Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-offenders reform and reclaim their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Maruna, S., & Immarigeon, R. (2004). After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233–238.
McAlinden, A.-M., Farmer, M., & Maruna, S. (2017). Desistance from sexual offending: Do the mainstream theories apply? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17(3), 266–283.
McNeill, F. (2014, May 15). University of Sheffield Centre for Criminological Research seminar series on ‘Coping with Crime: Citizens and Government’. Seminar 4: How best to stop offenders reoffending and reintegrate them into civil society. Paper presented at the British Academy in London.
Melemis, S. M. (2015). Relapse prevention and the five rules of recovery. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 88(3), 325–332.
Nicholaichuk, T. P., Olver, M. E., Gu, D., & Wong, S. C. (2014). Age, actuarial risk, and long-term recidivism in a national sample of sex offenders. Sexual Abuse, 26(5), 406–428.
Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Bushway, S., Kerrison, E., & O’Connell, D. (2015). Human agency and explanations of criminal desistance: Arguments for a rational choice theory. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(3), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-015-0013-2.
Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1156. ISSN: 0091-4169/09/9904-1103.
Perrin, C., Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Norman, C. (2018). Religion and desistance: Working with sexual and violent offenders. Finding freedom in confinement: The role of religion in prison life (p. 24). Santa Barbara: Praeger.
Purvis, M., Ward, T., & Willis, G. (2011). The good lives model in practice: Offence pathways and case management. European Journal of Probation, 3(2), 4–28.
Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.
Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline. (2014). Retrieved from https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Final_Sexual_Offences_Definitive_Guideline_content_web1.pdf.
Smith, B. T., Padgett, D. K., Choy-Brown, M., & Henwood, B. F. (2015). Rebuilding lives and identities: The role of place in recovery among persons with complex needs. Health & Place, 33, 109–117.
Socia, K. M., & Rydberg, J. (2016). Sex offender legislation and policy. In T. G. Blomberg, J. Brancale, K. M. Beaver, & W. D. Bales (Eds.), Advancing criminology and criminal justice policy (pp. 187–202). London, UK: Routledge.
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 93–159). New York: Academic Press.
Sutherland, E. H., Cressey, D. R., & Luckenbill, D. (1995). The theory of differential association. In N. J. Herman (Ed.), Deviance: A symbolic interactionist approach (pp. 64–68). Oxford: General Hall.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Information (International Social Science Council), 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204.
Tewksbury, R., & Zgoba, K. (2009). Perceptions and coping with punishment: How registered sex offenders respond to stress, internet restrictions, and the collateral consequences of registration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(4), 537–551.
Thomas, T. (2010). The sex offender register, community notification and some reflections on privacy. In K. Harrison (Ed.), Managing high-risk sex offenders in the community: Risk management, treatment and social responsibility (pp. 61–78). Portland: Wilan Publishing.
Ward, T., & Gannon, T. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(1), 77–94.
Ward, T., Gannon, T. A., & Birgden, A. (2007). Human rights and the treatment of sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(3), 195–216.
Ward, T., Mann, R. E., & Gannon, T. A. (2007). The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 87–107.
Ward, T., & Marshall, B. (2007). Narrative identity and offender rehabilitation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x06291461.
Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm. Oxon: Routledge.
Ward, T., Polaschek, D. L., & Beech, A. R. (2006). Theories of sexual offending. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Ward, T., & Stewart, C. A. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34(4), 353–360.
Weaver, B. (2015). Offending and desistance: The importance of social relations. Abingdon: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kewley, S. (2019). How Might Faith Communities Promote Desistance from Sexual Crime? An Exploration of Theory. In: Winder, B., Blagden, N., Hocken, K., Elliott, H., Lievesley, R., Banyard, P. (eds) Sexual Crime, Religion and Spirituality. Sexual Crime. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26040-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26040-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26039-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26040-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)