Skip to main content

COBIT as a Framework for Enterprise Governance of IT

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enterprise Governance of Information Technology

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

This chapter discusses Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology (COBIT) as a framework for enterprise governance of information and technology (EGIT). The chapter starts with a brief overview of COBIT’s history. Then, the most recent version of the COBIT framework, i.e., COBIT 2019, is introduced. Next, the six principles that describe the core requirements of an EGIT system as introduced in the COBIT 2019 framework are presented and discussed. This is followed by an overview of the COBIT 2019 core model and its 40 governance and management objectives and the specific guidance contained therein. The COBIT 2019 performance management approach is also introduced. Finally, some insights and examples are provided that demonstrate how the generic guidance contained in COBIT 2019 can be applied to the specific context of an enterprise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ITGI (2003) recognized value delivery and risk management as outcome areas; and strategic alignment, resource management, and performance measurement as drivers.

  2. 2.

    Refer to Chap. 3 on business/IT alignment for additional substantiation.

  3. 3.

    Refer to Chap. 4 on IT business value for additional substantiation.

  4. 4.

    Refer to Chap. 2 on Enterprise Governance of IT for additional substantiation.

  5. 5.

    Refer to Chap. 2 on Enterprise Governance of IT for additional substantiation.

  6. 6.

    Refer to Chap. 4 on IT business value for additional substantiation.

  7. 7.

    As a side note, this exact management process was indeed part of the COBIT 5 process enabler.

  8. 8.

    This illustrates the interaction between EGIT components (in this case the process and the organizational structures), i.e., demonstrating that various EGIT components work together in a holistic way.

  9. 9.

    https://www.sfia-online.org/en/framework/sfia-6.

  10. 10.

    http://www.ecompetences.eu/e-cf-overview/.

  11. 11.

    https://na.theiia.org/standards-guidance/mandatory-guidance/Pages/Core-Principles-for-the-Professional-Practice-of-Internal-Auditing.aspx.

  12. 12.

    https://www.axelos.com/best-practice-solutions/itil/what-is-itil.

  13. 13.

    It should be noted that ISACA however states that other governance and management component types—i.e., besides processes—(e.g., organizational structures) may also have capability levels defined for them in further COBIT 2019 guidance (ISACA, 2018b).

  14. 14.

    Refer to Chap. 4 on IT business value for additional substantiation of “information economics”.

  15. 15.

    Governance objective EDM02 and management objective APO05 are related in the sense that they both are of primary importance for achieving alignment goal “realized benefits from I&T-enabled investments and services portfolio” (AG03).

  16. 16.

    Refer to Chap. 4 on IT business value for additional substantiation on business cases and the business case process.

References

  • Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the system for organizations. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. V. (1997). Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: Evidence from a single case site. Information Systems Research, 8(1), 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. E., & Grant, G. G. (2005). Framing the frameworks: A review of it governance research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1), 696–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2009). An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment. Information Systems Management, 26(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., & Debreceny, R. S. (2013). COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: Building blocks and research opportunities. Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, B., & Meyer, R. (2014). Strategy synthesis: Managing strategy paradoxes to create competitive advantage (4th ed.). Cengage Learning India Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huygh, T., & De Haes, S. (2019). Investigating IT governance through the viable system model. Information Systems Management, 36(2), 168–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISACA. (2018a). COBIT 2019 framework: Governance and management objectives.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISACA. (2018b). COBIT 2019 framework: Introduction & methodology.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC. (2015). ISO/IEC standard 38500: Information technology—Governance of IT for the organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • IT Governance Institute (ITGI). (2003). Board briefing on IT governance (2nd ed). Retrieved from http://www.isaca.org/knowledge-center/research/researchdeliverables/pages/board-briefing-on-it-governance-2nd-edition.aspx.

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, Division of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. R. (2004). Crafting information technology governance. Information Systems Management, 21(4), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, D. S., & Karahanna, E. (2009). Antecedents of IS strategic alignment: A nomological network. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, A., & Hirschheim, R. (2003). An extended platform logic perspective of IT governance: Managing perceptions and activities of IT. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12(2), 129–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuperaert, D. (2019). COBIT 2019: A significant update. EDPACS, 59(1), 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Grembergen, W., Saull, R., & De Haes, S. (2003). Linking the IT balanced scorecard to the business objectives at a major Canadian financial group. Journal for Information Technology Cases and Applications, 5(1), 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2009). IT savvy: What top executives must know to go from pain to gain. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven De Haes .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., Joshi, A., Huygh, T. (2020). COBIT as a Framework for Enterprise Governance of IT. In: Enterprise Governance of Information Technology. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25918-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics