Psychological Correlates of Interoceptive Perception in Healthy Population

  • Daniele Di LerniaEmail author
  • Silvia Serino
  • Giuseppe Riva
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 288)


Investigating awareness of internal state of the body (i.e. interoception) is a promising field in the neuroscience domain. Evidence indicated interoceptive alterations in a wide variety of conditions. However, among literature, there is a consistent lack of information regarding the psychological correlates of interoceptive awareness (IA) in healthy population.

Methods: 54 subjects performed a complete interoceptive assessment for accuracy (IAc), metacognitive awareness (IAw), and sensibility (IAs) measured through M.A.I.A questionnaire. Subjects also performed psychological assessment for depression (BDI), anxiety (BAI), state and trait anxiety (STAI), and eating disorders (EDI-3) risks. Results: IAc and IAw positively correlated across the whole sample and IAw strongly positively correlated with several MAIA subscales. Significant negative correlations were also found with state anxiety and depressive symptoms. Female subjects exhibited a different interoceptive pattern with a negative relationship between IAc and BMI, and IAw and state anxiety. Conversely, male subjects exhibited a positive relationship between IAw and BMI, and IAc and Age, while IAw showed a negative relationship with state anxiety and depression. Conclusions: Perception of internal state of the body and relative metacognitive awareness appeared only partially connected. Different interoceptive patterns between male and female subjects appeared primarily related to specific body perceptions rather than gender differences. Considering the relationship between interoception and wellbeing, knowledge regarding how interoceptive processes work could help develop tailored technological interventions that utilize interoceptive treatments and multisensory stimulation to enhance human well-been through technology.


Interoception Interoceptive awareness Emotions Interoceptive technology Interoceptive stimulation Interoceptive treatments 



GR was funded by the MIUR PRIN research project ‘‘Unlocking the memory of the body: Virtual Reality in Anorexia Nervosa’’ (201597WTTM).


  1. 1.
    Riva, G.: The neuroscience of body memory: from the self through the space to the others. Cortex 104, 241–260 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Riva, G., et al.: Embodied medicine: mens sana in corpore virtuale sano. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 120 (2017). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riva, G., et al.: Positive and transformative technologies for active ageing. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 220, 308–315 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riva, G.: The neuroscience of body memory: from the self through the space to the others. Cortex 104, 241–260 (2018). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Critchley, H.D., Garfinkel, S.N.: Interactions between visceral afferent signaling and stimulus processing. Front. Neurosci. 9, 286 (2015). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Watson, D.R., et al.: Computerized exposure therapy for Spider Phobia: effects of cardiac timing and interoceptive ability on subjective and behavioral outcomes. Psychosom. Med. 81, 90–99 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Craig, A.D.: Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13(4), 500–505 (2003). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garfinkel, S.N., et al.: Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biol. Psychol. 104, 65–74 (2015). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Lernia, D., et al.: Pain in the body. Altered interoception in chronic pain conditions: a systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 71, 328–341 (2016). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pollatos, O., et al.: Differential effects of anxiety and depression on interoceptive accuracy. Depress. Anxiety 26(2), 167–173 (2009). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dunn, B.D., et al.: Heartbeat perception in depression. Behav. Res. Ther. 45(8), 1921–1930 (2007). Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pollatos, O., et al.: Reduced perception of bodily signals in anorexia nervosa. Eat. Behav. 9(4), 381–388 (2008). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di Lernia, D., et al.: Feel the time. Time perception as a function of interoceptive processing. Front. Hum, Neurosci. 12(74) (2018).
  14. 14.
    Beck, A.T., et al.: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 4, 561–571 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steer, R.A., et al.: Dimensions of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in clinically depressed outpatients. J. Clin. Psychol. 55(1), 117–128 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Storch, E.A., et al.: Factor structure, concurrent validity, and internal consistency of the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition in a sample of college students. Depress. Anxiety 19(3), 187–189 (2004). Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spielberger, C.D., et al.: Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (1970)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dunn, B.D., et al.: Can you feel the beat? Interoceptive awareness is an interactive function of anxiety- and depression-specific symptom dimensions. Behav. Res. Ther. 48(11), 1133–1138 (2010). Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beck, A.T., et al.: An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56(6), 893 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garner, D.M., et al.: Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2(2), 15–34 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eshkevari, E., et al.: Increased plasticity of the bodily self in eating disorders. Psychol. Med. 42(4), 819–828 (2012). Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clausen, L., et al.: Validating the eating disorder inventory-3 (EDI-3): a comparison between 561 female eating disorders patients and 878 females from the general population. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 33(1), 101–110 (2011). Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schandry, R.: Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology 18(4), 483–488 (1981). Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hugeng, H., Kurniawan, R.: Development of the ‘healthcor’system as a cardiac disorders symptoms detector using an expert system based on Arduino UNO”. Int. J. Technol. 7(1), 78 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ševčík, J., et al.: System for EKG monitoring. Int. J. Adv. Res. Artif. Intell. 4(9) (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stojanović, R., et al.: Alternative approach to addressing infrastructure needs in biomedical engineering programs (case of emerging economies). Folia Medica Facultatis Medicinae Universitatis Saraeviensis 50(1) (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Villarrubia, G., et al.: EKG mobile. Adv. Sci. Technol. Lett. 49, 95–100 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Villarrubia, G., De Paz, Juan F., Corchado, Juan M., Bajo, J.: EKG intelligent mobile system for home users. In: Bazzan, Ana L.C., Pichara, K. (eds.) IBERAMIA 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8864, pp. 767–778. Springer, Cham (2014). Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mehling, W.E., et al.: The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLoS ONE 7(11), e48230 (2012). Scholar
  30. 30.
    Di Lernia, D., et al.: Toward an embodied medicine: a portable device with programmable interoceptive stimulation for heart rate variability enhancement. Sensors 18(8) (2018). Scholar
  31. 31.
    Di Lernia, D., Riva, G., Cipresso, P.: iStim. A new portable device for interoceptive stimulation. In: Cipresso, P., Serino, S., Ostrovsky, Y., Baker, Justin T. (eds.) MindCare 2018. LNICST, vol. 253, pp. 42–49. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  32. 32.
    Di Lernia, D., et al.: Interoceptive axes dissociation in anorexia nervosa: a single case study with follow up post-recovery assessment. Front. Psychol. 9(2488) (2019).
  33. 33.
    Crucianelli, L., et al.: Bodily pleasure matters: velocity of touch modulates body ownership during the rubber hand illusion. Front. Psychol. 4, 703 (2013). Scholar
  34. 34.
    Serino, S., et al.: The role of age on multisensory bodily experience: an experimental study with a virtual reality full-body illusion. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 21(5), 304–310 (2018). Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zanier, E.R., et al.: Virtual reality for traumatic brain injury. Front. Neurol. 9(345) (2018).
  36. 36.
    Castelnuovo, G., et al.: What is the role of the placebo effect for pain relief in neurorehabilitation? Clinical implications from the Italian Consensus Conference on pain in neurorehabilitation. Front. Neurol. 9, 310 (2018)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Di Lernia, D., et al.: Ghosts in the machine. Interoceptive modeling for chronic pain treatment. Front. Neurosci. 10, 314 (2016). Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniele Di Lernia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Silvia Serino
    • 2
  • Giuseppe Riva
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly
  2. 2.MySpace LabDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences University Hospital Lausanne (CHUV)LausanneSwitzerland
  3. 3.Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology LabIRCCS Istituto Auxologico ItalianoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations