Abstract
Data sets exhibiting a hierarchical or nested structure, or including longitudinal or spatial elements often arise in insurance studies. This generally results in correlation among the responses within the same group, casting doubts about the outputs of analyses assuming mutual independence. Random effects offer a convenient way to model such grouping structure. This chapter presents the Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) approach to regression analysis. In this framework, random effects are added on the same scale as the linear combination of the available features (called fixed effects). Predictive distributions, that is, conditional distribution of the response given past experience, are particularly attractive to re-valuate future premiums based on claims observed previously.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
NACE codes are often used in workers’ compensation insurance. NACE (Nomenclature of Economic Activities) is the European statistical classification of economic activities grouping organizations according to their business activities. The NACE code is subdivided in a hierarchical, four-level structure.
References
Antonio K, Beirlant J (2007) Actuarial statistics with generalized linear mixed models. Insur: Math Econ 40:58–76
Brouhns N, Guillen M, Denuit M, Pinquet J (2003) Bonus-malus scales in segmented tariffs with stochastic migration between segments. J Risk Insur 70:577–599
Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1986) Econometric models based on count data: comparisons and applications of some estimators. J Appl Econ 46:347–364
Denuit M, Guillen M, Trufin J (2019) Multivariate credibility modeling for usage-based motor insurance pricing with behavioral data. Ann Actuarial Sci
Fahrmeir L, Kneib T, Lang S, Marx B (2013) Regression models, methods and applications. Springer
Faraway JJ (2016) Extending the linear model with R: generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FL
Frees EW, Derrig RA, Meyers G (2014) Predictive modeling applications in actuarial science. Volume I: Predictive Modeling Techniques. International Series on Actuarial Science. Cambridge University Press
Frees E, Young V, Luo Y (1999) A longitudinal data analysis interpretation of credibility models. Insur: Math Econ 24:229–247
Frees E, Young V, Luo Y (2001) Case studies using panel data models. North Am Actuarial J 5:24–42
Hainaut D, Trufin J, Denuit M (2019) Effective statistical learning methods for actuaries—neural networks and unsupervised methods. Springer Actuarial Series
Liang K, Zeger S (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22
Nelder JA, Verrall RJ (1997) Credibility theory and generalized linear models. ASTIN Bull 27:71–82
Ohlsson E (2008) Combining generalized linear models and credibility models in practice. Scand Actuarial J 2008:301–314
Trufin J, Denuit M, Hainaut D (2019) Effective statistical learning methods for actuaries—tree-based methods. Springer Actuarial Series
Winkelmann R, Zimmermann KF (1991) A new approach for modeling economic count data. Econ Lett 37:139–143
Winkelmann R, Zimmermann KF (1995) Recent development in count data modelling: theory and application. J Econ Surv 9:1–24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Denuit, M., Hainaut, D., Trufin, J. (2019). Over-Dispersion, Credibility Adjustments, Mixed Models, and Regularization. In: Effective Statistical Learning Methods for Actuaries I. Springer Actuarial(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25820-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25820-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25819-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25820-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)