Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

This chapter presents aspects of the identity and social skills that many members of the Post-Millennial cohort are likely to possess as they enter the full-time workforce. While our assessments are speculative and we recognize individual differences, we have identified certain areas of continuity and, more critically, key differences between many of the Millennials currently in the workforce and the digital Post-Millennials who will follow them. The chapter draws on the concept of social construction to argue that the digital environment will serve as a powerful mediator of how today’s youth will come to understand their world and how they will develop generally shared views, definitions, ideas and meanings. In this context, analyses consider the potential impacts of: parenting; social media; diversity and attitudes towards migration and multiculturalism; collaboration and teamwork; global citizenship and civic engagement as well as the dark side of social media: trolls, cyberbullying and sextortion. We foresee the Post-Millennials having the potential to enter the workforce better equipped to make sense of, and succeed in, their careers than their Millennial elders. This extends to how they will fit into organizations with the conclusion that employers will need to consider the consequences of the current approach of ensuring new hires adapt to the organizational culture.

People resist a census but give them a profile page and they’ll spend all day telling you who they are.

—Max Barry, Lexicon

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Noting that there are vast literatures in philosophy, anthropology and theology on this subject, this section is informed by the works that followed from Berger and Luckman’s (1969)  sociological perspectives presented in The Social Construction of Reality.

  2. 2.

    Again, there are extensive literatures across several disciplines and across different cultures as to how children are encouraged or discouraged from dealing with contestable knowledge; our presentation is informed by the works of Kegan (1982)  and Kohlberg  (1972) on stages of moral development.

  3. 3.

    We recognize parental concerns in this area, however, there is a recognition that more children are encountering a wide range of information at an earlier age. Examples of recent media coverage, include Canada: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/polarized-debates-over-ontario-sex-education-curriculum-continue/article24915342/, the US: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/f365ce6b31104450bd821ff502824717/omaha-and-much-us-debate-over-sex-education-rages, and the UK: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationopinion/11434500/Who-should-deliver-sex-education.html.

  4. 4.

    The comScore survey “How Old Is Too Young?” is accessible at: https://www.microsoft.com/about/philanthropies/youthspark/youthsparkhub/programs/onlinesafety/resources/.

  5. 5.

    For a recent extension of this phenomenon, see Elwood Watson’s article “Overbearing, Snowplough Parents Have Replaced Helicopter Parents” accessible at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elwood-d-watson/overbearing-snowplough-pa_b_5720354.html.

  6. 6.

    See Chua (2011) and associated media coverage regarding what are seen as over-controlling parents who place strong pressures on their children to succeed. In Japanese culture, referred to as Kyoiku mama.

  7. 7.

    See Lenore Skenazy’s (2009) Free-Range Kids and the related media coverage of this parenting style.

  8. 8.

    http://wric.com/2015/04/07/survey-discovers-6-years-old-is-the-average-age-of-kids-when-they-first-receive-a-cell-phone/.

  9. 9.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2198450/Three-quarters-British-children-aged-10-mobile-phone--twice-overseas.html.

  10. 10.

    https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/zero-to-eight-childrens-media-use-in-america-2013/key-finding-2%3A-kids%27-time-on-mobile-devices-triples.

  11. 11.

    For a recent discussion of how Millennials view their online reputation, see: https://www.reputationmanagement.com/blog/2016/1/22/do-millennials-care-about-their-reputation.

  12. 12.

    We acknowledge that teens, in particular, will continue to engage in degrees of socially inappropriate or risky behaviours including sexting however that they will be developing greater self-awareness hence self-control over time.

  13. 13.

    See the Adecco 2015 Way to Work Survey accessible at:

    http://www.taprootfoundation.org/about-probono/blog/generation-z-entering-workforce-your-company-ready.

  14. 14.

    The poll results are accessible at: https://fusiondotnet.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/fusion-poll-gender-spectrum.pdf.

  15. 15.

    The news release for this poll is accessible at: https://www.jwtintelligence.com/2016/03/gen-z-goes-beyond-gender-binaries-in-new-innovation-group-data/.

  16. 16.

    See the Institute for Public Relations Dec 2016 report accessible at: http://www.instituteforpr.org/millennialswork-perspectives-diversity-inclusion/.

  17. 17.

    See the SPLC Spring 2016 Intelligence Report accessible at: https://www.splcenter.org/news/2016/02/17/splcs-intelligence-report-amid-year-lethal-violence-extremist-groups-expanded-ranks-2015.

  18. 18.

    Noting that attitudes across Europe regarding immigration continue to shift, this 2011 report indicated that attitudes in the UK were the most negative when compared to France, Germany, Italy, Spain or the US. See, Blinder (2012).

  19. 19.

    Accessible at: http://www.voxeurop.eu/en/content/news-brief/4932007-map-showing-eu-countries-attitude-towards-foreign-immigration.

  20. 20.

    Accessible at: http://www.environicsinstitute.org/uploads/institute-projects/environics%20institute%20-%20focus%20canada%20spring%202015%20survey%20on%20immigration-multiculturalism%20-%20final%20report%20-%20june%2030-2015.pdf.

  21. 21.

    His 9 Dec 2015 OpEd in the Globe and Mail titled: “Why Canada, U.S., diverge on Syrian refugees” is accessible at: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/distinct-societies-why-canada-us-diverge-on-syrian-refugees/article27652245/.

  22. 22.

    See the report at: https://acs-aec.ca/en/.

  23. 23.

    To paraphrase from the original attributed to Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. “Your right to swing your cultural fist ends where my cultural nose begins”: live your life as you wish but don’t impose your values on me.

  24. 24.

    As stated earlier, in part of her analyses, Agati (2011) demonstrated that the events of 9/11 had differing impacts depending on how closely these affected the lives of the participants.

  25. 25.

    We acknowledge that the curriculum updates of the late 80s through 1990s were more extensive than we have summarized; see Anderson and Jaafar (2003) for a comprehensive presentation in the Ontario school system.

  26. 26.

    For illustrations in the mass media, see Kathryn Blaze Carlson “No winners: Children still keeping score despite move to end sports competition” National Post 22 September 2012 and Sarah Boesveld “Many parents see competitive activities as not just important, but essential for their children’s success” National Post, 16 August 2013.

  27. 27.

    The poll conducted by the Associated Press- NORC at the University of Chicago is accessible at: http://www.apnorc.org/projects/Pages/american-teens-are-politically-engaged-but-pessimistic-about-countrys-direction.aspx.

  28. 28.

    As an illustration, see Paecher (2013) for an examination of on collaborative online constructions of identity amongst young women.

  29. 29.

    Amongst our research team, John Verdon argues that both social and technological changes will lead to the end of privacy as we have known it for over 500 years; others were not swayed and especially did not see this happening in the next decade or so thus we have assumed that anonymity will remain for the near future.

  30. 30.

    In the US, see the Carla Jamerson case, in Canada: Rehtaeh Parsons, in the UK: Brodie Panlock.

  31. 31.

    See http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/07/01/sextortion-teens-online/11580633/ and http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/sextortion-canadian-teens-1.3240470.

References

  • Agati, H. A. (2011). The millennial generation: Howe and Strauss disputed. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. ATT 3492308).

    Google Scholar 

  • American Press Institute. (2015). How Millennials Get News: Inside the Habits of America’s First Digital Generation accessible at: http://www.americanpressinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Media-Insight-Millennials-Report-March-2015.pdf.

  • Anderson, S. E., & Jaafar, S. B. (2003). Policy trends in Ontario education—1990–2003. Toronto: International Centre for Educational Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apollon, D. (2011). Don’t call them “post-racial”: Millennials’ attitudes on race, racism, and key systems in our society. New York: Applied Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. A. (1969). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, S. (2012). UK public Opinion towards immigration: Overall attitudes and levels of concern. Oxford: The Migration Observatory, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighi, A., Melotti, G., Guarini, A., Genta, M. L., Ortega, R., Mora-Merchán, J., et al. (2012). Self-esteem and loneliness in relation to cyberbullying in three European countries. In Q. Li, D. Cross, & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinckerhoff, P. (2007). Generations: The challenge of a lifetime for your nonprofit.Saint Paul, MN: Fieldstone Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences,67, 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmon, I. (2010). What Facebook does to teenage girls. Jezebel, November 5. http://jezebel.com/5682488/what-does-facebook-do-to-teenage-girls.

  • Carrasco, M. M. (2016). The ideal Millennial working woman: A thematic analysis of how female professional identity and community are constructed online. Paper presented at the Kent University Research Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizily, D., & Leskovec, J. (2015). Antisocial behavior in online discussion communities. Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), Oxford, UK. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1504.00680v1.pdf.

  • Chua, A. (2011). Battle hymn of the tiger mother. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in twitter using big data. Journal of Communication,64(2), 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone Inc. & AMP Insights. (2006). Millennial cause study—The Millennial generation: Pro-social and empowered to change the world. Retrieved from http://blogthinkbig.com/wp-content/uploads/Cone-Millennial-Cause-Study-La-hora-de-cambiar-el-mundo.pdf.

  • Craig, W. M., & McCuaig Edge, H. (2008). Bullying and fighting. In W. Boyce, M. King, & J. Roche (Eds.), Healthy settings for young people in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: The Public Health Agency of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scalaa, A., Caldarellia, G., et al. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,113(3), 554–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2005). Who are the Millennials? A.k.a. Generation Y. Oakland, CA: Deloitte Development LLC. Retrieved from http://www.mcosa.net/SPF-SIG%20TRAINING%20Folder/us_consulting_millennialfactsheet_080606.pdf

  • Drago, J. P. (2006). Generational Theory: Implications for Recruiting the Millennials. Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., Ashmore, M., & Potter, J. (1995). Death and furniture: The rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism. History of the Human Sciences,8(2), 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, T. (2010). Generation iY: Our last chance to save their future. Atlanta, Georgia: Poet Gardner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, T. (2008) Plugged In: The Generation Y Guide to Thriving at Work. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzon, A., Howell, L, & Zakheim, D. (2008). Military of Millennials. Toronto: Booz & Company. Retrieved from http://www.strategy-business.com/media/file/resilience-03-10-08.pdf.

  • Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. (2008). Social constructionism. In L. M. Givens (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. (Vol. 2, p. 816). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, E., & Weber, K. (2008). Generation we: How millennial youth are taking over America and changing our world forever. Emeryville, CA: Pachatusan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald Associates. (2000). Children, families, and the internet. Retrieved from http://www.grunwald.com/pdfs/CHILDREN-FAMILIES-AND-INTERNET-2000.pdf.

  • Gündüz, U. (2017). The effect of social media on identity construction. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,8(5), 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S. C., & Kapidzic, S. (2015). Teens, gender, and self-presentation in social media. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyler, J. N. (2013). Millennial generation opinions of the military: A case study (Master thesis). Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a580427.pdf.

  • Jenson, J., Fisher, S., & Taylor, N. (2011). Critical review and analysis of the issue of “skills, technology and learning”: Final Report. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabali, H. K., Irigoyen, M. M., Nunez-Davis, R., Budacki, J. G., Mohanty, S. H., Leister, K. P., et al. (2015). Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children. Pediatrics,136(6), 1044–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kann, L., Kinchen, S.. Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Hawkins, J., Harris, W. A., Lowry, R., Olsen, E., McManus, T., Chyen, D., Whittle, L., Taylor, E., Demissie, Z., Brener, N., Thornton, J., Moore, J., & Zaza, S. (2014). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63(4), 1–168. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6304.pdf.

  • Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1972). Collected papers on moral development and moral education. Cambridge, MA: Center for Moral Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P. (1988). Hidden rape: Sexual aggression and victimization in the national sample of students in higher education. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 145–168). New York, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health,53(1 Supplement), S13–S20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, L. C. and Stillman, D. (2002). When Generations Collide. Who They Are. Why They Clash. How to Solve the Generational Puzzle at Work. New York: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, A. (2015). Teen, social media and technology overview 2015. Washington: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, M. (2015) The triumph of occupy wall street. The Atlantic, 10 Jun 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C., & Tulgan, B. (2006). Managing the generation mix: From urgency to opportunity (2nd ed.). Amherst, MA: HRD Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, M. E. (1979). The People Puzzle: Understanding yourself and others. Reston, VA: Reston.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlynn, A. P. (2010). Millennials—the “always connected” generation. The Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education,20(22), 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology,25(2), 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., & Krook, M. L. (2009). One of Us: Multilevel models examining the impact of descriptive representation on civic engagement. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP09-030, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paecher, C. (2013). Young women online: collaboratively constructing identities. Pedagogy, Culture & Society,21(1), 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescents: Implications for empirical research. Journal of Adolescent Health,53(4), 431–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2012). The rise of intermarriage: Rates, characteristics vary by race and gender. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/16/the-rise-of-intermarriage/.

  • Pew Research Center. (2015). Comparing Millennials to other generations. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/02/24/interactive-graphic-demographic-portrait-of-four-generations/.

  • Pinder-Grover, T. & Groscurth, C. R. (2009). Principles for teaching the millennial generation: Innovative practices of U-M faculty (CRLT Occasional Paper No. 26). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Research on Learning and Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy,6(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, T., & Rainer, J. (2011). The Millennials: Connecting to the largest generation. Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raines, C. (2002). Managing Millennials. Retrieved from http://www.generationsatwork.com/articles_millenials.php.

  • Roberts, J. W. (2011). Little brother is watching and recording you: Social control in a deviant group. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. ATT 1497185).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenberg, J., Modi, K., & Salmond, K. (2013). The State of girls: Unfinished business. New York: Girl Scouts Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skenazy, L. (2009). Free-range kids: Giving our children the freedom we had without going nuts with worry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, D. & Griffis, H. (2008). A Review of Millennial Generation Characteristics and Military Workforce Implications. Arlington, VA: Center for Naval Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2015). Mixed unions in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Retrieved from https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-010-x/99-010-x2011003_3-eng.cfm.

  • Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation (3rd ed.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, A., & Lyons, D. S. (2008). Millennials in the workplace. Halifax, NS: Knightsbridge Robertson Surrette. Retrieved from http://www.kbrs.ca/insights/millennials-workplace.

  • Sykes, C. J. (1995). Dumbing down our kids: Why American children feel good about themselves but can’t read, write, or add. New York: St Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, L. (2010). Who are the Millennials? DRDC CORA Technical Memorandum 2010-284. Ottawa, ON: Defence R&D Canada—Centre for Operational Research and Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (2016). The next America: Boomers, Millennials, and the looming generational showdown. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trzesniewski, K. H., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Rethinking “generation me”: A study of cohort effects from 1976–2006. Perspectives on Psychological Science,5(1), 58–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled–and more miserable than ever before. New York: Atria Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Freeman, E. C. (2012). Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966–2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,102(5), 1045–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vézina, M., & Crompton, S. (2012). Volunteering in Canada. (Component of Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 11-008-X, Canadian Social Trends). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-x/2012001/article/11638-eng.pdf.

  • Wang, J., Nansel, T. R., & Iannotti, R. J. (2011). Cyber bullying and traditional bullying: Differential association with depression. Journal of Adolescent Health,48(4), 415–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, A. (2001). Recruiting the next generation: A study of attitudes, values, and beliefs (Master thesis). Retrived from http://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/10862.

  • Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (1999). Generations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in your workplace. New York: AMA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Okros .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Okros, A. (2020). Identity and Social Skills. In: Harnessing the Potential of Digital Post-Millennials in the Future Workplace. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25726-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics