Skip to main content

Independent Core Observer Model Research Program Assumption Codex

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 948))

Abstract

This document contains taxonomical assumptions, as well as the assumption theories and models used as the basis for all ICOM related research as well as key references to be used as the basis for and foundation of continued research as well as supporting any one that might attempt to find fault with our fundamentals in the hope that they do find flaw in or otherwise better inform the ICOM research program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Camp J (2016) Decisions are emotional, not logical: the neuroscience behind decision making. http://bigthink.com/experts-corner/decisions-are-emotional-not-logical-the-neuroscience-behind-decision-making. Accessed June 2016

  2. Chalmers D (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Conscious Stud 2(3):200–219. http://consc.net/papers/facing.pdf

  3. Damasio A (2005) Descartes’ error: emotion reason and the human brain. Penguin Books. ISBN 014303622X

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dienes Z, Seth A (2010) Measuring any conscious content versus measuring the relevant conscious content: comment on Sandberg et al. Conscious Cogn 19:1079–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dienes Z, Seth A (2012) The conscious and unconscious, University of Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gregory (2004) Qualia: What it is like to have an experience, NYU. https://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/faculty/block/papers/qualiagregory.pdf

  7. Kelley D (2016) Critical nature of emotions in artificial general intelligence – key nature of AGI behavior and behavioral tuning in the independent core observer model architecture based system, IEET

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kurzweil R (2001) The law of accelerating returns. http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns

  9. Leahu L, Schwenk S, Sengers P. Subjective objectivity: negotiating emotional meaning, Cornell University. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~lleahu/DISBIO.pdf

  10. Merriam-Webster (2017) Definition of consciousness. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/consciousness

  11. Overgaard M (2010) Measuring consciousness - bridging the mind-brain gap, Hammel Neurocenter Research Unit

    Google Scholar 

  12. Porter III H (2016) A methodology for the assessment of AI consciousness. In: Proceedings of the 9th conference on artificial general intelligence, Portland State University Portland

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rescorla M (2016) The computational theory of mind. Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computational-mind/

  14. Sandberg K, Bibby B, Timmermans B, Cleeremans A, Overgaard M (2011) Measuring consciousness: task accuracy and awareness as sigmoid functions of stimulus duration. Conscious Cogn 20:1659–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seth A (2008) Theories and measures of consciousness develop together. Conscious Cogn 17:986–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Kelley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kelley, D.J. (2020). Independent Core Observer Model Research Program Assumption Codex. In: Samsonovich, A. (eds) Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2019. BICA 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 948. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25719-4_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics