Skip to main content

The Multiple Agencies of Metropolitan Institutions: Is There Convergence?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance

Abstract

This chapter examines the multiple agencies of institutions that drive processes of metropolitan change. The institutional context of metropolitan planning and development largely determines the opportunities and constraints that condition and sets the rules for metropolitan actors to partake in such processes. While intrinsically linked to the genius loci, national and/or regional governments continue to play key roles in setting agendas and shaping debates about the future of metropolitan regions, e.g. through enabling or blocking institutional, legal or fiscal tools. At the same time, there is an increasing influence of private and non-governmental actors attempting to influence metropolitan development agenda and processes. This chapter focuses on the rationales behind the motivations and strategies of different actors with a stake in metropolitan policymaking. To shed light on the policy contexts where collaboration and competition take place, the chapter delves into the interplay between local governments and an array of public, private and non-governmental stakeholders holding capacity to cater to metropolitan growth and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 2012, 82% of deputies of the assemblée nationale and 77% of senators held at least one other elected office. The proportion of parliamentarians at the head of a local executive (mayor or chairman of a county or regional council) was 45% for the deputies and 48% for senators. These figures make France an exception in Europe. In Italy, 16% of parliamentarians hold at least one other elected office, 15% in Spain, 13% in Great Britain and 10% in Germany. In January 2014, the French parliament adopted a law prohibiting the combination of local executive functions with a deputy or senator’s post. This law came into force on 31 March 2017.

References

  • Baraize, F., & Négrier, E. (Eds.). (2001). L’invention Politique de l’Agglomération. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, J. (2006). Geographic scale and functional scope in metropolitan governance reform: Theory and evidence from Germany. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(2), 121–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bölling, L., & Sieverts, T. (2004). Mitten am Rand: Auf dem Weg von der Vorstadt über die Zwischenstadt zur Regionalen Stadtlandschaft. Wuppertal: Müller and Busmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, P., Breuillard, M., Fraser, C., & Paris, D. (Eds.). (2007). Spatial planning systems of Britain and France: A comparative analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2004). Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe, 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 447–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlabac, O., Medir, L., Tomàs, M., & Lackowska, M. (2018). Metropolitan challenges and reform pressures across Europe—the perspectives of city mayors. Local Government Studies, 44(2), 229–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demazière, C. (2017). Des métropoles incompletes: Points communs et différences des institutions métropolitaines en Angleterre et en France [Incomplete cities: Commonalities and institutional differences between metropolitan areas in England and France]. Pouvoirs Locaux, 111, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demazière, C. (2018). Strategic spatial planning in a situation of fragmented local government: The case of France. disP The Planning Review, 54(2), 56–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurocities. (2013). Metropolitan areas in action. Brussels: Eurocities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedeli, V. (2017). Metropolitan governance and metropolitan cities in Italy: Outdated solutions for processes of urban regionalisation? Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, B. (2003). The Frankfurt Rhine-Main region. In W. Salet, A. Thornley, & A. Kreukels (Eds.), Metropolitan governance and spatial planning: Comparative case studies of European city-regions (pp. 125–144). London: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, D. (2000). Ecological modernisation, regional economic development and regional development agencies. Geoforum, 31(1), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R., Wolmann, H., Connolly, D., Pearson, L., & McManmon, R. (2010). Globalization and leadership in American cities. In P. Kantor, & D. Judd (Eds.), American urban politics in a global age (pp. 47–63). New York: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., & Growe, A. (2014). From places to flows? Planning for the new ‘regional world’ in Germany. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban politics in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B, 71(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyler, M., Freytag, T., & Mager, C. (2006). Advantageous fragmentation? Reimagining metropolitan governance and spatial planning in Rhine-Main. Built Environment, 32(2), 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulst, R., & van Montfort, A. (2011). Institutional features of inter-municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, R., & Siegl, C. (2017). The global city comes home: Internalised globalisation in Frankfurt Rhine-Main. In R. Keil, P. Hamel, J.-A. Boudreau, & S. Kipfer (Eds.), Governing cities through regions: Canadian and European perspectives (pp. 259–282). Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, H., Wünnemann, M., & Roost, F. (2017). Post-suburban revitalization? Redevelopment of suburban business centres in the Frankfurt/Rhine-Main region. Journal of Urban Design, 22(2), 249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1993). Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-Fordist political wconomy. Studies in Political Economy, 40(1), 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, A. E. G., Goetz, A., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2014). City-regionalism as a politics of collective provision: Regional transport infrastructure in Denver, USA. Urban Studies, 51(11), 2444–2465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jouve, B., & Lefèvre, C. (Eds.). (1999). Villes, métropoles: Les nouveaux territoires du politique [Cities, metropolises: The new territories of the politics]. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackowska, M. (2011). Frankfurt/Rhine-Main: Governance without coordination? In H. Heinelt, E. Razin, & K. Zimmermann (Eds.), Metropolitan governance: Different paths in contrasting contexts: Germany and Israel, Campus (pp. 79–114). Frankfurt am Main: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Galès, P. (1988). Grande-Bretagne: Le gouvernement contre les villes [Great Britain: The government against cities]. Annales de la Recherche Urbaine, 38(1), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefèvre, C., & Weir, M. (2010). Building metropolitan institutions. In K. Mossberger, S. Clarke, & P. John (Eds.), Urban politics (pp. 624–641). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majoor, S., & Salet, W. (2008). The enlargement of local power in trans-scalar strategies of planning: Recent tendencies in two European cases. GeoJournal, 72(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2013). Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city. Urban Geography, 34(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, D., Belina, B., Petzold, T., Pohl, L., & Schipper, S. (2016). Social protest and its policing in the ‘heart of the European crisis regime’: The case of Blockupy in Frankfurt, Germany. Political Geography, 55(1), 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelles, J. (2013). Cooperation and capacity? Exploring the sources and limits of city-region governance partnerships. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(4), 1349–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). OECD Outlook: France. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, D., & Baert, T. (2011). Lille 2004 and the role of culture in the regeneration of Lille Métropole. Town Planning Review, 82(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinson, G., & Morel Journel, C. (2016). The neoliberal city—theory, evidence, debates. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savini, F. (2013). The governability of national spatial planning: Light instruments and logics of governmental action in strategic urban development. Urban Studies, 50(8), 1592–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, S. (2014). The financial crisis and the hegemony of urban neoliberalism: Lessons from Frankfurt am Main. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), 236–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E., & Kaika, M. (2000). The environment of the city or… the urbanisation of nature. In G. Bridge, & S. Watson (Eds.), A companion to the city (pp. 51–67). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomàs, M. (2016). Building narratives of city-regions: The case of Barcelona. In R. Keil, P. Hamel, J-A. Boudreau, & S. Kipfer (Eds.), Governing cities through regions: Canadian and European perspectives (pp. 319–335). Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomàs, M. (2020). Metropolitan revolution or metropolitan evolution? The (dis)continuities in metropolitan institutional reforms. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 25–39). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. (2009). Regions, megaregions, and sustainability. Regional Studies, 43(6), 863–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, K. (2014). Democratic metropolitan governance: Experiences in five German metropolitan regions. Urban Research & Practice, 7(2), 182–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, K. (2017). Re-scaling of metropolitan governance in Germany. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, K. (2020). What is at stake for metropolitan regions and their governance institutions? In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 59–74). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, K., & Heinelt, H. (2012). Metropolitan governance in Deutschland: Regieren in Ballungsräumen und neue Formen politischen Steuerung [Metropolitan governance in Germany: Governing in metropolitan areas and new forms of political governance]. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Demazière .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Demazière, C. (2020). The Multiple Agencies of Metropolitan Institutions: Is There Convergence?. In: Zimmermann, K., Galland, D., Harrison, J. (eds) Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25632-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics