Abstract
Over 330 correctional institutions in the United States and globally have implemented a prison animal program , with the most popular being dog-training programs. This chapter will examine the different types of dog programs in correctional facilities and how program structure and implementation has varied. Broadly speaking, there are two types of dog-training programs: those that train shelter dogs for adoption and those that train dogs to work as service animals. There are a smaller number of more specialized rehabilitation and training programs, too (e.g., kenneling, grooming, and private training for owned dogs; collaboration with veterinary medicine programs to restore dogs to health, and fostering programs for purebred rescue groups). The common structure of these different programs will be discussed, as well as the extent of the implementation. Next, the chapter will explore the different variations of dog rehabilitation and training programs. Dog programs differ in structure and implementation and tend to do so in accordance with the demographics and needs of their canine and human participants, as well as according to the structure and ethos of the correctional facility in question. Program size, duration, admittance criteria, daily activities, required certifications , housing arrangements, and program completion criteria all vary by program. Furthermore, the intended purpose of the programs themselves can be quite different across programs; some programs focus primarily on the outcomes of the dogs, making their training the priority of the program, while others stress the importance of rehabilitating the inmates and providing them with educational and vocational resources. These variations have several implications for dog program researchers and practitioners. This chapter will conclude with a discussion of these implications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Angola in particular has received a lot of criticism for its prison farm and harsh conditions (Center for Land Use Interpretation, n.d.).
- 2.
TNR programs aim to help reduce the number of feral cats in a community by trapping them, neutering/spaying them, and returning them to their original environments. In some TNR programs, when a cat is deemed adoptable, they are adopted into the community instead of returned back to their environment.
- 3.
The Parenting, Prison, and Pups program is a multi-modal program that also incorporates parenting skills training alongside therapy dogs.
References
Bachi, K. (2013). Equine-facilitated prison-based programs within the context of prison-based animal programs: State of the science review. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52(1), 46–74.
Beetz, A., Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Julius, H., & Kotrschal, K. (2012). Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: The possible role of oxytocin. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–15.
Button, A. (2007). “Freedom from themselves”: Gendered mechanisms of control, power, and resistance in prison dog training programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University.
Cooke, B. J. (2017). Altruism prison programmes in America: A platform for transformation. In E. van Ginneken & E. Hart (Eds.), New perspectives on desistance theoretical and empirical developments (pp. 139–162). London: Palgrave.
Cooke, B. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). The perceived effects of dog-training programmes in correctional settings. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 16(3), 171–183.
Cooke, B. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2016). A systematic review and meta-analyses on the effects of prison-based dog-training programs on recidivism and psychological factors. The Prison Journal, 96(6), 854–876.
Currie, N. (2008). A case study of incarcerated males participating in a canine training program. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kansas State University.
Davis, K. (2007). Perspectives of youth in an animal-centered correctional vocational program: A qualitative evaluation of Project Pooch. Unpublished master’s thesis, Portland State University.
Deaton, C. (2005). Humanizing prisons with animals: A closer look at “cell dogs” and horse programs in correctional institutions. Journal of Correctional Education, 46–62.
Fawcett, N., & Gullone, E. (2001). Cute and cuddly and a whole lot more? A call for empirical investigation into the therapeutic benefits of human–animal interaction for children. Behaviour Change, 18(02), 124–133.
Florida Department of Corrections. (2013). Want to Know More About Our Inmate Dog Training Programs? Retrieved December 10, 2013 from http://www.dc.state.fl.us/apps/utopia/learn.html
Furst, G. (2006). Prison-based animal programs: A national survey. The Prison Journal, 86(4), 407–430. Retrieved July 28, 2019 from: https://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/publications/fsw/pet/pet-eng.shtml
Furst, G. (2011). Animals programs in prison: A comprehensive assessment. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
Grommon, E., Carson, D. C., & Kenney, L. (2018). An experimental trial of a dog-training program in a juvenile detention center. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9346-2
Harbolt, T., & Ward, T. H. (2001). Teaming incarcerated youth with shelter dogs for a second chance. Society and Animals, 9(2), 177–182.
Jasperson, R. A. (2010). Animal-assisted therapy with female inmates with mental illness: A case example from a pilot program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49(6), 417–433.
Lai, J. (1998). Pet facilitated therapy in correctional institutions. Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada, Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Women. Retrieved July 28, 2019 from: https://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/publications/fsw/pet/pet-eng.shtml
Moeller, C., King, N., Burr, V., Gibbs, G. R., & Gomersall, T. (2018). Nature-based interventions in institutional and organisational settings: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 28(3), 293–305.
North Carolina Department of Public Safety. (2013). North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Prisons Facility Listings by Region. Retrieved March 1, 2019 from http://www.doc.state.nc.us/dop/OfficialDOP.RegionMap.pdf.
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. (2013). Field Operations. Retrieved December 10, 2013 from: http://www.drc.ohio.gov/web/prisprog.htm
Puppies Behind Bars. (n.d.). Puppies behind bars: Puppies behind bars trains inmates to raise puppies to become service dogs for the disabled and explosive detection canines for law enforcement. Retrieved March 10, 2019 from http://www.puppiesbehindbars.com/
Strimple, E. O. (2003). A history of prison inmate-animal interaction programs. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(1), 70–78.
Winters, R. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of prison farm programs. Corrections.com. Retrieved from http://www.corrections.com/news/article/33907-evaluating-the-effectiveness-of-prison-farm-programs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooke, B.J. (2019). Exploring Types of Programs: Dog Rescue, Rehabilitation and Training. In: Jalongo, M. (eds) Prison Dog Programs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25618-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25618-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25617-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25618-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)