Abstract
Considerable effort to manually configure the user’s context and too coarse-grained activity recognition results often make it difficult to set up and run an assistive system. This chapter is the result of our experience with the Human Behavior Monitoring and Support (HBMS) assistive system, which monitors user’s activities of daily life and supports the user in carrying out these activities based on his own behavior model. To achieve the required context awareness, we join assistive systems with the semantic web to (1) simplify the construction of a personalized context model and to (2) improve the system’s activity recognition capabilities. We show how to semantically describe devices and web applications including their functionalities and user instructions and how to represent these descriptions in the web. The advantages of this semantic markup approach for the application of HBMS-System and beyond are discussed. Moreover, we show how personalized and adaptive HBMS user clients and the power of the context model of HBMS-System can be used to bridge an existing activity recognition gap.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See, e.g., http://sdo-schemaorgae.appspot.com/TechArticle.
References
Al Machot F, Mayr HC, Michael J (2014) Behavior modeling and reasoning for ambient support: HCM-L modeler. In: Hutchison D et al (eds) Modern advances in applied intelligence. International conference on industrial engineering and other applications of applied intelligent systems, IEA/AIE 2014, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, proceedings, Part II. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 388–397
Arning K, Ziefle M (2015) “Get that camera out of my house!” Conjoint measurement of preferences for video-based healthcare monitoring systems in private and public places. In: Geissbühler A et al (eds) Inclusive smart cities and e-health. 13th international conference on smart homes and health telematics, ICOST 2015, Geneva, Switzerland, LNCS 9102. Springer, Cham, pp 152–164
Chan LM, Zeng ML (2006) Metadata interoperability and standardization-a study of methodology part I: achieving interoperability at the schema level. D-LIB Mag 12(6)
Chen L, Hoey J, Nugent CD, Cook DJ, Yu Z (2012) Sensor-based activity recognition. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, and Cybern-Part C 42(6):790–808
Chen L, Nugent CD, Okeyo G (2014) An ontology-based hybrid approach to activity modeling for smart homes. IEEE Trans Hum-Mach Syst (THMS) 44(1):92–105
Chen L, Nugent CD, Wang H (2012) A knowledge-driven approach to activity recognition in smart homes. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 24(6):961–974
Daniele L, Solanki M, den Hartog F, Roes J (2016) Interoperability for smart appliances in the IoT world. In: Groth P et al (eds) The semantic web—ISWC 2016, LNCS 9982, Springer, pp 21–29
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) (2019) URL: goo.gl/gy4P9Q. Last access: 11.3.2019
eClassOWL—The Web Ontology for Products and Services (2007) URL: goo.gl/OgEJFg. Last access: 11.3.2019
FaBiO (2016) The FRBR-aligned Bibliographic Ontology. URL: goo.gl/CW9QfL. Last access: 9.5.2017
Friend of a Friend (FOAF) (2015) URL: goo.gl/PH5YBR. Last access: 11.3.2019
Friesser J (2019) Semantische Aufbereitung von Benutzeroberflächen von Webapplikationen für die aktive Assistenz mit HBMS, diploma thesis
Geisberger E, Broy M (eds) (2012) agendaCPS: Integrierte Forschungsagenda Cyber-physical systems, vol 1. Springer
Guizzardi G, Falbo R, Guizzardi RS (2008) Grounding software domain ontologies in the unified foundational ontology (UFO): the case of the ODE software process ontology. In: M Lencastre et al (eds) 11th Ib. WS on RE and SW Environments, pp 127–140
Hepp M (2008) GoodRelations: an ontology for describing products and services offers on the web. In: Gangemi A, Euzenat J (eds) Knowledge engineering: practice and patterns, vol 5268. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 329–346
Hisham A (2015) Dublin core versus Schema.org: a head-to-head metadata comparison. URL: goo.gl/btkd91. Last access: 11.3.2019
IoT-O (2017) a core domain Internet of things ontology. URL: goo.gl/CH1cdX. Last access: 11.3.2019
Jovanovic J, Bagheri E (2016) Electronic commerce meets the semantic web. IT Prof 18(4):56–65
Kharlamov E et al (2016) Capturing industrial information models with ontologies and constraints. In: Groth P et al (eds) The semantic web—ISWC 2016, LNCS 9982, Springer, pp 325–343
Kofod-Petersen A, Cassens J (2006) Using activity theory to model context awareness. In: Roth-Berghofer TR, Schulz S, Leake DB (eds) Modeling and retrieval of context. MRC Workshop 2005, Edinburgh, UK, revised selected papers, LNCS 3946. Springer, Berlin, pp. 1–17
Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI) (2018) URL: goo.gl/APM6lE. Last access: 8.3.2019
Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV) (2019) URL: goo.gl/JWhNDU. Last access: 11.3.2019
Mayr HC, Al Machot F, Michael J, Morak G, Ranasinghe S, Shekhovtsov V, Steinberger C (2016) HCM-L: domain-specific modeling for active and assisted living. In: Karagiannis D, Mayr HC, Mylopoulos JP (eds) Domain-specific conceptual modeling. Concepts, methods and tools, vol 5. Springer, Cham, pp 527–552
Mayr HC, Michael J, Ranasinghe S, Shekhovtsov VA, Steinberger C (2017) Model centered architecture. In: Cabot J et al (eds) Conceptual modeling perspectives. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 85–104
Michael J, Mayr HC (2013) Conceptual modeling for ambient assistance. In: Ng W, Storey VC, Trujillo J (eds) Conceptual modeling—ER 2013. 32th International conference on conceptual modeling. Hong-Kong, China, LNCS 8217. Springer, pp 403–413
Michael J, Koschmider A, Mannhardt F, Baracaldo N, Rumpe B (2019) User-centered and privacy-driven process mining system design. To appear in CAiSE Forum
Michael J, Steinberger C (2017) Context modelling for active assistance. In: Proceedings of the ER Forum 2017 and the ER 2017 demo track co-located with ER 2017, CEUR workshop proceedings (CEUR-WS.org), pp 221–234
Michael J, Steinberger C, Shekhovtsov VA, Al Machot F, Ranasinghe S, Morak G (2018) The HBMS story. Enterprise modelling and information systems architectures. Int J Concept Model 13:345–370
Ni Q, García Hernando AB, Pau de la Cruz I (2015) The elderly’s independent living in smart homes: a characterization of activities and sensing infrastructure survey to facilitate services development, Sensors 15(5):11312–11362
Object Management Group OMG (2016) Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core, URL: http://bit.ly/OMG-MOF, Version 2.5.1. Last accessed 11.3.2019
Open Graph Protocol (OGP) (2014) URL: goo.gl/5lKfLM. Last access: 11.3.2019
OWL Representation of ISO 19115 (Geographic Information-Metadata) (2014) URL: goo.gl/ygbQZ7. Last access: 11.3.2019
Provoc—Product Vocabulary (2016) URL: goo.gl/HGm3u1. Last access: 11.3.2019
Rafferty J, Nugent CD, Liu J, Chen L (2017) From activity recognition to intention recognition for assisted living within smart homes. IEEE Tr. Hum-Mach Syst 47(3):368–379
Seydoux N, Drira K, Hernandez N, Monteil T (2016) IoT-O, a core-domain IoT ontology to represent connected devices networks. In: Blomqvist E et al (eds) European knowledge acquisition workshop (EKAW 2016): knowledge engineering and knowledge management, Springer, pp 561–576
Shekhovtsov VA, Ranasinghe S, Mayr HC, Michael J (2018) Domain specific models as system links. In: Woo C, Lu J, Li Z, Ling TW, Li G, Lee ML (eds) Advances in conceptual modeling. ER 2018, Xian, China. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 330–340
Smart Appliances REFerences (SAREF) Ontology (2013) URL: goo.gl/Y93h64. Last access: 11.3.2019
Stavrakantonakis I, Fensel A, Fensel D (2014) Matching web entities with potential actions. In: SEMANTiCS 2014—posters & demos track. CEUR
Steinberger C, Michael J (2017) Semantic mark-up of operating instructions. Tech. Report. URL: http://bit.ly/semanticMarkup. Last access: 11.3.2019
Steinberger C, Michael J (2018) Towards cognitive assisted living 3.0. In: IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PerCom workshops), Athens. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 687–692
Strube G (ed) (1996) Wörterbuch der Kognitionswissenschaft. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart
Svátek V, Růžička M (2003) Step-by-step mark-up of medical guideline documents. Int J Med Inf 702(3):329–335
Vitvar T, Kopecký J, Viskova J, Fensel D (2008) WSMO-lite annotations for web services. In: Bechhofer S (ed) The semantic web: research and applications. 5th European semantic web conference, ESWC 2008, Tenerife, Spain. Springer, Berlin, pp 674–689
WSMO-Lite Ontology (2013) URL: goo.gl/5y5uxo. Last access: 11.3.2019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steinberger, C., Michael, J. (2020). Using Semantic Markup to Boost Context Awareness for Assistive Systems. In: Chen, F., García-Betances, R., Chen, L., Cabrera-Umpiérrez, M., Nugent, C. (eds) Smart Assisted Living. Computer Communications and Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25590-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25590-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25589-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25590-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)