Abstract
Traffic management on the internet might lead to discriminatory practices, in case network operators block or degrade online services that compete with their own services. Such practices jeopardize the open character of the internet and stifle competition on the net. In the EU, the European Commission acknowledged in 2009 its commitment in preserving the open and neutral character of the internet, and vowed to enshrine net neutrality as a policy objective and a regulatory principle. Consequently, Regulation 2015/2120 was adopted aiming to safeguard equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic on the provision of internet access services and related users’ rights. Providers of internet services are allowed, however, to apply reasonable traffic management in accordance with objectively justified technical requirements. The situation is different in the U.S., where the rules on net neutrality, that were adopted by the Federal Communications Commission in 2015, were repealed in December 2017. However, several U.S. states have introduced state legislation to ensure net neutrality, and this has been challenged before the courts. Contentious issues related to net neutrality appear additionally on the introduction of the 5G mobile network standard.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Savin (2013), p. 5.
- 2.
E-Commerce Directive, Article 4.
- 3.
See Oxman (1999).
- 4.
See Murray (2013), p. 16.
- 5.
- 6.
See LSE Media Policy Project Blog (2011).
- 7.
See Wu (2003).
- 8.
See Murray (2013), p. 25.
- 9.
Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, OJ L 108/33, 24.4.2002.
- 10.
Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services, and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union, OJ L 301/1.
- 11.
Ibid, Recital. 3.
- 12.
Ibid, Recital 2.
- 13.
Ibid, Recital 6.
- 14.
See, i.e., European Commission - Fact Sheet, Roaming charges and open Internet: Questions and answers, 30 June 2015.
- 15.
Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
- 16.
BEREC (2012).
- 17.
See Frieden (2007).
- 18.
FCC, Restoring Internet Freedom.
- 19.
See Trump’s plan to overturn net neutrality rules to face ‘a tsunami of resistance’, Rushe (2017).
- 20.
Coren (2017).
- 21.
Sasko (2017).
- 22.
See, i.e., Shepardson (2018).
- 23.
Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services, OJ L 337/37, 18.12.200.
- 24.
Regulation (EC) No 544/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 on roaming on public mobile telephone networks within the Community and Directive 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, OJ L 167/12, 29.6.2009.
- 25.
Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services as amended by Directive 2009/136 OJ L 108/51.
- 26.
See Kroes (2010).
- 27.
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council laying down measures concerning the European Single Market for Electronic Communications and to achieve a connected continent COM (2013) 627 final.
- 28.
Regulation 2015/2120, Recital 3.
- 29.
Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union, OJ L 310/1, 26.11.2015.
- 30.
Ibid.
- 31.
Marcus (2016), p. 270.
- 32.
See Article 288 TFEU.
- 33.
Regulation 2015/2120, Recital 6.
- 34.
Ibid, Recital 4.
- 35.
Ibid, Recital 5.
- 36.
Ibid, Recital 7.
- 37.
Ibid, Recital 8.
- 38.
Ibid, Recital 9.
- 39.
European Commission - Fact Sheet. Roaming charges and open Internet: questions and answers, Brussels, 30 June 2015.
- 40.
Regulation 2015/2120, Article 3(5)(2).
- 41.
See Epicenter works, Penalties for Net Neutrality Infringements in the EU, https://en.epicenter.works/document/1255.
- 42.
EETT (2017).
- 43.
EETT (2018).
- 44.
BEREC (2018).
- 45.
EDRI (2018).
References
BEREC (2012) A view of traffic management and other practices resulting in restrictions to the open internet in Europe, 20 May 2012
BEREC (2018) BEREC Work Programme 2019, BoR (18) 174, 4 October 2018
Coren M (2017) Trump’s plan to overturn net neutrality rules to face ‘a tsunami of resistance’. https://qz.com/1027755/net-neutrality-google-and-amazon-are-fighting-to-save-internet-s-that-trump-says-are-killing-business
EDRI (2018) Net neutrality vs. 5G: what to expect from the upcoming EU review? https://edri.org/net-neutrality-vs-5g-what-to-expect-from-the-upcoming-eu-review/?fbclid=IwAR1J4oFbkHHR8Y2gOAF4o1omJFXTuOQqvd1wwdn331kEh3EvzgnxPZRbuGY
EETT (2017) EETT Annual Report to the European Commission and the European Regulators’ Body for Electronic Communications (BEREC) on the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 on access to the open Internet. http://www.eett.gr/opencms/export/sites/default/EETT/Electronic_Communications/Telecoms/NetNeutrality/AnnualReport/NN_report_2016-2017_EETT.pdf
EETT (2018) National Regulation on Open Internet, 876/7B. https://www.eett.gr/opencms/export/sites/default/admin/downloads/telec/apofaseis_eett/kanonistikes_apofaseis_eett/AP876-007B.pdf
European Commission - Fact Sheet. Roaming charges and open Internet: questions and answers, Brussels, 30 June 2015
FCC, Restoring Internet Freedom. https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/open-internet
Frieden R (2007) Internet 3.0: identifying problems and solutions to the network neutrality debate. Int J Commun 1:461–492
https://www.phillymag.com/business/2017/12/18/comcast-net-neutrality-repeal
Kroes N (2010) Net neutrality in Europe, Address at the ARCEP Conference, Paris, 13th April 2010. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-10-153_en.pdf
LSE Media Policy Project Blog (2011) Net-neutrality: the first amendment of the internet. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2011/03/30/net-neutrality-the-first-amendment-of-the-internet/
Marcus JS (2016) Net neutrality rules in Europe: comparisons to those in the U.S. Colo Technol Law J 14(2):270
Murray A (2013) Information technology law. The law and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Nunizato D (2009) Virtual freedom: net neutrality and free speech in the internet age. Stanford University Press
Oxman J (1999) The FCC and the unregulation of the internet, OPP Working Paper No. 31. https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.pdf
Rushe D (2017) Trump’s plan to overturn net neutrality rules to face ‘a tsunami of resistance’. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/26/trump-overturn-net-neutrality-rules-resistance
Sasko C (2017) What the FCC’s net neutrality decision means for Comcast (and you). https://www.phillymag.com/business/2017/12/18/comcast-net-neutrality-repeal
Savin A (2013) EU internet law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK, Northampton MA, USA
Shepardson D (2018) California will not enforce state net neutrality law pending appeal. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-internet/california-will-not-enforce-state-net-neutrality-law-pending-appeal-idUSKCN1N02KU
Wu T (2003) Network neutrality, broadband discrimination. J Telecommun High Technol Law 2:141
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iglezakis, I. (2020). Net Neutrality: Chances and Challenges in the Information Age. In: Synodinou, TE., Jougleux, P., Markou, C., Prastitou, T. (eds) EU Internet Law in the Digital Era. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25579-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25579-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25578-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25579-4
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)