Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Berge Equilibrium: A Game-Theoretic Framework for the Golden Rule of Ethics

Part of the book series: Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications ((SDGTFA))

  • 407 Accesses

Abstract

Game theory is a mathematical framework for strategy analysis and design as well as for optimal decision-making under conflict and behavioral uncertainty. On the one hand, game theory plays a key role for modern economics; on the other, it suggests possible approaches and solutions for complex strategic problems in various fields of human activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Originates from The Bible, Acts 20:35: “In all things I have shown you that by working hard in this way we must help the weak and remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how he himself said, ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive.”’

  2. 2.

    Give equal shares to all. Daniel Defoe appears to be the first to have used this phrase in The Life and Strange Adventures of Robinson Crusoe (1719): “He declar’d he had reserv’d nothing from the Men, and went Share and Share alike with them in every Bit they eat.”

  3. 3.

    People should accept the way other people live and behave, especially if they do things in a different way.

  4. 4.

    A fragment from Ruslan and Lyudmila, a poem by Aleksandr S. Pushkin, (1799–1837), a Russian poet, novelist, dramatist, and short-story writer. Considered as the greatest poet and founder of modern Russian literature.

References

  1. Gorelik, V.A., Gorelov, M.A., and Kononenko, A.F., Analiz konfliktnykh situatsii v sistemakh upravleniya (Analysis of Conflict Situations in Control Systems), Moscow: Radio i Svyaz’, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Smirnova, L.V., and Gorbatov, A.S., Mathematical Foundations of the Golden Rule. II. Dynamic Case, Mat. Teor. Igr Prilozh., 2016, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 27–62.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Salukvadze, M.E., Mnogoshagovye pozitsionnye konflikty i ikh prilozheniya (Multistage Positional Conflicts and Their Applications), Moscow–Tbilisi: Intelekti, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Salukvadze, M.E., Nekotorye igrovye zadachi upravleniya i ikh prilozheniya (Some Game-Theoretic Problems of Control and Their Applications), Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kudryavtsev, K.N., Coordinated Solutions in Multiagent Information Environment, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. Dissertation (Phys.-Math.), South-Ural Fed. Univ., Chelyabinsk, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kudryavtsev, K.N. and Stabulit, I.S., Strongly-Guaranteed Equilibrium in One Spatial Competition Problem, Tr. XVI Mezhd. Konf. “Sistemy komp’yuternoy matematiki i ikh prilozheniya” (Proc. XVI Int. Conf. “Systems of Computer Mathematics and Their Applications”), Smolensk: Gos. Univ., 2015, vol. 16, pp. 181–183.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lavrov, P.L., Sotsial’naya revolyutsiya i zadachi nravstvennosti. Tom 1 (Social Revolution and Ethical Tasks. Vol. 1), Moscow: Mysl’, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Malkin, I.G., Teoriya ustoychivosti dvizheniya (Theory of Motion Stability), Moscow: Nauka, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muschick, E. and Müller, P., Metody prinyatiya tekhnicheskikh reshenii (Methods of Technical Decision-Making), Moscow: Mir, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pecherskii, S.L. and Belyaeva, A.A., Teoriya igr dlya ekonomistov. Vvodnyy kurs (Game Theory for Economists. An Introductory Course), St. Petersburg: Evrop. Univ., 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pisarchuk, N.N., Vvedenie v teoriyu igr (Introduction to Game Theory), Minsk: Belorus. Gos. Univ., 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Podinovskii, V.V., General Zero-Sum Two-Person Games, Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Matem. Fiz., 1981, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1140–1153.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Podinovskii, V.V., The Principle of Guaranteed Result for Partial Preference Relations, Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Matem. Fiz., 1979, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1436–1450.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Podinovskii, V.V. and Noghin, V.D., Pareto-optimal’nye resheniya mnogokriterial’nykh zadach (Pareto Optimal Solutions of Multicriteria Problems), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Russko–anglo–nemetskii tolkovyi slovar’ po biznesu (Russian–English–German Glossary on Business Science), Kuznetsova, N.N., Novikova, E.V., Plekhanov, S.V., and Chekmezov, N.A., Eds., Moscow: Gorizont, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smol’yakov, E.R., Teoriya konfliktnykh ravnovesii (Theory of Conflict Equilibria), Moscow: URSS, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fischer, S., Dornbusch, R., and Schmalensee, R., Economics, McGraw-Hill, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shubik, M., The Present and Past of Game Theory, Mat. Teor. Igr Prilozh., 2012, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 93–116.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Entsiklopediya matematiki. Tom 1–5. (Encyclopeadia of Mathematics. Vols. 1–5), Moscow: Sovetsk. Entsiklop., 1977–1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A century of mathematics in America 1988–1989, vol. 1–3, ed. AMS (vol. 1. P. 382).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Archibald, R.C., A Semicentennial History of American Mathematical Society. 1888–1938 (2 vols.), 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Berge, C., Théorie générale des jeux ánpersonnes games, Paris: Gauthier Villars, 1957. (Russian translation: Berge, C., Obshchaya teoriya igr neskol’kikh lits, Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 1961).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Bertrand, J., Caleul des probabilities, Paris, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bertrand, J., Book review of theorie mathematique de la richesse sociale and of recherches sur les principles mathematiques de la theorie des richesses, Journal de Savants, 1883, vol. 67, pp. 499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Borel, E., Sur les systemes de formes lineares a determinant symetrique gauche et la theorie generale du jeu, Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences, 1927, vol. 184, pp. 52–53.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Cournot, A., Principes de la theorie des richeses, Paris, 1863.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cournot, A., Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie de richesses, Paris, 1838.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Geoffrion, A.M., Proper Efficiency and the Theory of Vector Maximization, J. Math. Anal. and Appl., 1968, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 618–630.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Lung, R.I., Gaskó, N., and Dumitrescu, D., Characterization and Detection of 𝜖-Berge-Zhukovskii Equilibria, PLoS ONE, 2015, vol. 10, no. 7: e0131983. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0131983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Megen, F., Born, P., and Tijs, S., A Preference Concept for Multicriteria Game, Mathematical Methods of OR, 1999, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nash, J.F., Non-Cooperative Games, Ann. Math., 1951, vol. 54, pp. 286–295.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Nash, J.F., Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games, Proc. Nat. Academ. Sci. USA, 1950, vol. 36, pp. 48–49.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Nessah, R., Larbani, M., and Tazdait, T., A Note on Berge Equilibrium, Applied Mathematics Letters, 2007, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 926–932.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton Univ. Press, 1944.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Pottier, A. and Nessah, R., Berge-Vaisman and Nash Equilibria: Transformation of Games, International Game Theory Review, 2014, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 1450009.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Shubik, M., Review of C. Berge “General theory of n-person games,” Econometrica, 1961, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Steuer, R., Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Tanaka, T., Two Types of Minimax Theorems for Vector-Valued Functions, J. Optimiz. Theory and Appl., 1991, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 321–334.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Vaisbord, E.M. and Zhukovskiy, V.I., Introduction to Multi Player Differential Games and Their Applications, New York: Gordon and Breach, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wald, A., Statistical Decision Functions, New York: Wiley, 1950.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Lyapunov Functions in Differential Games, London and New York: Taylor and Francis, 2003.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Larbani, M., Alliance in Three Person Games, Dostizhen. Matem. Mekhan., 2017, vol. 22, no. 1 (29), pp. 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering Sciences and Information Technology, Georgian National Academy of Sciences, Tbilisi, Georgia

    Mindia E. Salukvadze

  2. Department of Optimal Control Faculty of Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

    Vladislav I. Zhukovskiy

Authors
  1. Mindia E. Salukvadze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vladislav I. Zhukovskiy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

E. Salukvadze, M., I. Zhukovskiy, V. (2020). Conclusion. In: The Berge Equilibrium: A Game-Theoretic Framework for the Golden Rule of Ethics. Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25546-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation