Skip to main content

New Approaches to the Solution of Noncooperative Games and Multicriteria Choice Problems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Berge Equilibrium: A Game-Theoretic Framework for the Golden Rule of Ethics

Abstract

This chapter considers three new approaches to important problems of mathematical game theory and multicriteria choice, which are described in four sections (5.1–5.4). The first approach ensures payoff increase with simultaneous risk reduction in the Savage–Niehans sense in multicriteria choice problems (Sect. 5.1) and noncooperative games (Sect. 5.2). The second approach allows to stabilize coalitional structures in cooperative games without side payments under uncertainty (Sect. 5.3). The third approach serves to integrate the selfish Nash equilibrium with the altruistic Berge equilibrium. Note that the investigations in Sects. 5.2–5.4 involve a special Germeier convolution of criteria and calculation of its saddle point in mixed strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Edgar Watson Howe, (1853–1937), was an American editor, novelist, and essayist.

  2. 2.

    German “Those who risk win.” This is an analog of the English proverb “Nothing ventured, nothing gained.”

  3. 3.

    French “Put oneself at risk.”

  4. 4.

    This Latin phrase expresses a main postulate of realism: universals exist in reality and independently from consciousness.

  5. 5.

    Latin “Words instruct, illustrations lead.”

  6. 6.

    Cases 1 and 2 will be considered with Pareto optimality, and case 3 with Proposition 5.1.1.

  7. 7.

    An English translation of a statement from [26].

  8. 8.

    Laura Elizabeth Ingalls Wilder (1867–1957) was an American writer known for the Little House on the Prairie series of children’s books.

  9. 9.

    Latin “To inform.”

  10. 10.

    Latin “When two do the same thing, it is not the same thing.” This phrase belongs to Terence, Latin in full Publius Terentius Afer, (195–159? B.C.), after Plautus the greatest Roman comic dramatist. See The Brothers V. 3.

  11. 11.

    Latin “All determination is negation.” This phrase belongs to Benedict de Spinoza, (1632–1677), a Dutch Jewish philosopher.

  12. 12.

    This Latin word combination identifies a starting point, an origin, a source, the heart of the matter.

  13. 13.

    French “All that is needed.”

  14. 14.

    French “That just goes to show!”

  15. 15.

    French “Complaining that the bride is too beautiful.” In our book, the advantages of Proposition 5.2.4 have exceeded all expectations.

  16. 16.

    Latin “Of all things that can be known and all kind of other things.” The first part of this phrase (de omni re scibili, meaning “of all things that can be known”) was the motto of pompous young lad and famous Italian philosopher Pico della Mirandola, who thought this was a fitting description of his encyclopedic knowledge. The second part (et quibusdam aliis, meaning “and even certain other things”) was ironically appended by pompous old and famous French philosopher Voltaire, who was somewhat under the impression he was any less full of himself.

  17. 17.

    French “At the end after all.”

  18. 18.

    French “To be continued.”

  19. 19.

    Claude Elwood Shannon, (1916–2001), was an American mathematician and electrical engineer who laid the theoretical foundations for digital circuits and information theory.

  20. 20.

    The Old Testament, Leviticus 19:9–18.

  21. 21.

    French “Every one is the architect of his own fortune.”

  22. 22.

    Robert Burns, (1759–1796), was a national poet of Scotland, who wrote lyrics and songs in Scots and in English.

  23. 23.

    Ursula K. Le Guin, original name Ursula Kroeber, (1929–2018), was an American writer best known for tales of science fiction and fantasy.

References

  1. Bardin, A.E., Risks and Regrets of Players in Games, Tr. III Mezhd. Konf. (Proc. III Int. Conf.), 2010, Orekhovo-Zuevo: Mosk. Gos. Oblast. Gumanit. Inst., pp. 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bardin, A.E., Risks and Regrets of Producers in the Market Model with Import under Uncontrollable Factors, Tr. III Mezhd. Konf. (Proc. III Int. Conf.), 2010, Orekhovo-Zuevo: Mosk. Gos. Oblast. Gumanit. Inst., pp. 277–281.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vaisman, K.S., Berge Equilibrium, Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.) Dissertation, St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg. Gos. Univ., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vaisman, K.S. and Zhukovskiy, V.I., Specifics of Zero-Sum Games with Vector Payoff Function, in Mnogokriterial’nye sistemy pri neopredelennosti (Multicriteria Systems under Uncertainty), Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk. Univ., 1988, pp. 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vaisman, K.S., Berge Equilibrium, in Lineino-kvadratichnye differentsial’nye igry (Linear-Quadratic Differential Games), Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Chikrii, A.A., Eds., Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1994, pp. 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ventsel’, E.S., Issledovanie operatsii (Operations Research), Moscow: Znanie, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vorobiev, N.N., Osnovy teorii igr. Beskoalitsionnye igry (Fundamentals of Game Theory. Noncooperative Games), Moscow: Nauka, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Poisk, 2004, nos. 34–35, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gantmacher, F.R., The Theory of Matrices. Vols. 1 and 2, New York: Chelsea Publishing, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Germeier, Yu. B., Vvedenie v teoriyu issledovaniya operatsii (Introduction to Operations Research), Moscow: Nauka, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glicksberg, I.L., A Further Generalization of the Kakutani Fixed Point Theorem, with Application to Nash Equilibrium Points, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 1952, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 170–174.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunford, N. and Schwartz, J.T., Linear Operators, New York: Interscience, 1958. Translated under the title Lineinye operatory. Obshchaya teoriya, Moscow: Inostrannaya Literatura, 1962, vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dmitruk, A.V., Vypuklyi analiz. Elementarnyi vvodnyi kurs (Convex Analysis. An Elementary Introductory Course), Moscow: Makspress, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Konflikty i riski (Conflicts and Risks), Moscow: Ross. Zaochn. Inst. Tekstil. Legk. Promysh., 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Vvedenie v differentsial’nye igry pri neopredelennosti. Ravnovesie ugroz i kontrugroz (Introduction to Differential Games under Uncertainty. Equilibrium in Threats and Counter-Threats), Moscow: URSS, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Vvedenie v differentsial’nye igry pri neopredelennosti. Ravnovesie po Berzhu–Vaismanu (Introduction to Differential Games under Uncertainty. Berge–Vaisman Equilibrium), Moscow: URSS, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Riski pri konfliktnykh situatsiyakh (Risks in Conflict Situations), Moscow: URSS, LENAND, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Bel’skikh, Yu.A., Nash and Berge Equilibria in a Two-Player Linear-Quadratic Game, Tr. XIII Mezhd. Nauchno-Praktich. Konf. “Otechestvennaya nauka v epokhu izmenenii: postulaty proshlogo i teorii novogo vremeni” (Proc. XIII Int. Scientific-Practical Conf. “National Science in the Era of Change: Postulates of Past and Theories of New Time”), St. Petersburg, National Association of Scientists, 2015, vol. 13, pp. 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Zhiteneva, Yu.M., Bertrand Difference–Differential Game Model in the Framework of Berge Equilibrium, Analiz, Modelirovanie, Upravlenie, Razvitie Sotsial’no-Ekonomicheskikh Sistem: Tr. IX Mezhd. Shkoly-Simpoziuma (AMUR-2015) (Analysis, Modeling, Management, Development of Socio-economic Systems: Proc. IX Int. School-Symposium (AMMD-2015)), Krymskii Fed. Univ., Simferopol, 2015, pp. 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Zhukovskaya, L.V., Risk v mnogokriterial’nykh i konfliktnykh sistemakh pri neopredelennosti (Risk in Multicriteria Choice and Conflict Systems under Uncertainty), Moscow: URSS, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Kudryavtsev, K.N., Pareto-Optimal Nash Equilibrium: Sufficient Conditions and Existence in Mixed Strategies, Automation and Remote Control, 2016, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1500–1510.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Kudryavtsev, K.N., Uravnoveshivanie konfliktov i prilozheniya (Equilibrating Conflicts and Applications), Moscow: URSS, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Kudryavtsev, K.N., and Smirnova, L.V., Garantirovannye resheniya konfliktov i prilozheniya (Guaranteed Solutions of Conflicts and Applications), Moscow: URSS, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Kudryavtsev, K.N., Equilibrating Conflicts under Uncertainty. I. Analogue of a Saddle-Point, Mat. Teor. Igr Prilozh., 2013, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 27–44.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Kudryavtsev, K.N., Equilibrating Conflicts under Uncertainty. II. Analogue of a Maximin, Mat. Teor. Igr Prilozh., 2013, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 3–45.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Kudryavtsev, K.N., The Existence of Guaranteed Imputation in Counter-Strategies, Spectral and Evolution problems: Proc. 17th Crimean Autumn Mathematical School-Symposium, Simferopol, 2007, vol. 17, pp. 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Makarkina, T.V., Samsonov, S.P., and Gorbatov, A.S., Berge Equilibrium for a Price Competition Model in a Duopoly Market, Tr. XII Mezhd. Nauchno-Praktich. Konf. “Otechestvennaya nauka v epokhu izmenenii: postulaty proshlogo i teorii novogo vremeni” (Proc. XII Int. Scientific-Practical Conf. “National Science in the Era of Change: Postulates of Past and Theories of New Time”), Yekaterinburg, National Association of Scientists, 2015, vol. 7, pp. 94–98.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Salukvadze, M.E., Riski i iskhody v mnogokriterial’nykh zadachakh upravleniya (Risks and Outcomes in Multicriteria Control Problems), Tbilisi: Intelekti, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Sachkov, S.N., About an Uncommon yet Benevolent Method of Conflict Resolution, Aktual. Voprosy Razvitiya Innovats. Deyatel’n. Nov. Tysyachelet., 2014, no. 10(14), pp. 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Smirnova, L.V., The Existence of Guaranteed Equilibrium, in Analiz, modelirovanie, upravlenie, razvitie (Analysis, Modeling, Management, Development), Vernadskii Gos. Univ., Sevastopol, 2012, pp. 159–163.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Tynyanskii, N.T., Ravnovesnye upravleniya mnogokriterial’nykh dinamicheskikh sistem (Equilibrium Control of Multicriteria Dynamic Systems), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Chikrii, A.A., and Soldatova, N.G., The Berge Equilibrium in the Conflicts under Uncertainty, XII Vserossiiskoe soveshchanie po problemam upravleniya (VSPU-2014) (Proc. XII All-Russian Meeting on Control Problems (AMCP-2014)), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Upravlen., 2014, pp. 8290–8302.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Chikrii, A.A., and Soldatova, N.G., Existence of Berge Equilibrium in Conflicts under Uncertainty, Automation and Remote Control, 2016, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 640–655.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Chikrii, A.A., and Soldatova, N.G., Diversification Problem of Deposits, in Analiz, modelirovanie, upravlenie, razvitie (Analysis, Modeling, Management, Development), Vernadskii Gos. Univ., Sevastopol, 2015, pp. 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Chikrii, A.A., On Discrete Conflict-Controlled Processes Described by Grunvald-Letnikov Fractional Systems, Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 2015, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kapitonenko, V.V., Finansovaya matematika i ee prilozheniya (Financial Mathematics and Its Applications), Moscow: Prior, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Karlin, S., Mathematical Methods and Theory in Games, Programming and Economics, London-Paris: Pergamon Press, 1959.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Kolesnik, G.V., Teoriya igr (Game Theory), Moscow: Librokom, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Krasovskii, N.N. and Subbotin, A.I., Pozitsionnye differentsial’nye igry (Positional Differential Games), Moscow: Nauka, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kudryavtsev, K.N. and Stabulit, I.S., Pareto-Guaranteed Equilibrium in 2D Hotelling Duopoly, Vestn. Yuzhno-Ural. Gos. Univ. Ser. Mat. Modelir. Programmir., 2012, vol. 14, no. 40, pp. 173–177.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H., Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey, Dover Books on Mathematics, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Lyusternik, L.A. and Sobolev, V.I., Elementy funktsional’nogo analiza (Elements of Functional Analysis), Moscow: Nauka, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Morozov, V.V., Sukharev, A.G., and Fedorov, V.V., Issledovanie operatsii v zadachakh i uprazhneniyakh (Operations Research in Problems and Exercises), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Knight, F.H., Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Podinovskii, V.V. and Noghin, V.D., Pareto-optimal’nye resheniya mnogokriterial’nykh zadach (Pareto Optimal Solutions of Multicriteria Problems), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ras, A., Davaite melochit’sya (Let Us Split Hairs), Moscow: Ripol Klassik, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rogov, M.A., Risk–menedzhment (Risk Management), Moscow: Finansy i Statistika, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Utkin, E.A., Risk-menedzhment (Risk Management), Moscow: Ekmos, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hille, E. and Phillips, R.S., Functional Analysis and Semi-Groups, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 31, Providence: Am. Math. Soc., 1957. Translated under the title Funktsional’nyi analiz i polugruppy, Moscow: Inostrannaya Literatura, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tsvetkova, E.V. and Arlyukova, I.O., Riski v ekonomicheskoi deyatel’nosti (Risks in Economic Activity), St.-Petersburg: Inst. Vneshneekon. Svyav. Ekon. Prav., 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cheremnykh, Yu.N., Mikroekonomika. Prodvinutyi uroven’ (Microeconomics: Advance Level), Moscow: Info-M, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cherkasov, V.V., Delovoi risk v predprinimatel’skoi deyatel’nosti (Business Risk in Entrepreneurship), Kiev: Libra, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Shakhov, V.V., Vvedenie v strakhovanie. Ekonomicheskii aspekt (Introduction to Insurance. Economic Aspect), Moscow: Finansy i Statistika, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Shikin, E.V., Ot igr k igram (From Games to Games), Moscow: URSS, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Arrow, K.J., Hurwicz, L., and Uzawa, H., Studies in Linear and Non-linear Programming, Stanford Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford Univ. Press, 1958.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Basar, T. and Olsder, G.J., Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory, London: Academic Press, 1982.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Bellman, R., On the Application of Dynamic Programming to Variational Problems Arising in Mathematical Economics, Proc. Symposium in Calculus of Variations and Applications, New York: McGraw–Hill, 1956, pp. 115–138.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Berge, C., Théorie générale des jeux ánpersonnes games, Paris: Gauthier Villars, 1957. (Russian translation: Berge, C., Obshchaya teoriya igr neskol’kikh lits, Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 1961).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Blackwell, O., An Analog of the Minimax Theorem for Vector-Payoffs, Pacific J. Math., 1956, no. 6, pp. 1–8.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Bertrand, J., Review of theory mathematique de la richesse sociale recherches sur les principes mathematique de la theorie des richesses, Journal des Savants, 1883, vol. 68, pp. 449–508.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Borel, E., La théorie du jeu et les equations intégrales a noyau symétrique, Compes Rendus de l’Académic des Sciences, 1921, vol. 173, pp. 1304–1308.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Borel, E., Sur les jeux an interviennent l’hasard et l’abilité des joueurs, in Théorie des probabilite’s, Paris, 1924, pp. 204–224.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Borel, E., Sur les systemes de formes lineares a determinant symetrique gauche et la theorie generale du jeu, Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences, 1927, vol. 184, pp. 52–53.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Bohnenblust, H.F. and Karlin, S., On a Theorem of Ville, in Contributions to the Theory of Games, Princeton: University Press, 1953, pp. 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Born, P., Tijs, S., and van der Aarssen, J., Pareto–Equilibrium in Multi-Objective Games, Methods of Operations Research, 1988, vol. 60, pp. 302–312.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Borwein, J., Proper Efficient Points for Maximization with Respect to Cones, SIAM J. Control and Optimiz., 1977, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 57–63.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Case, J.H. and Kimeldorf, G., On Nash Equilibrium Points and Games of Imperfect Information, J. Optimiz. Theory and Appl., 1972, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 302–323.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Chan, W.L. and Lau, W.T., Vector Saddle-Point and Distributed Parameter Differential Games, Comput. and Math. Appl., 1989, vol. 18, nos. 1–3, pp. 195–207.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Colman, A.M., Körner, T.W., Musy, O., and Tazdaït, T., Mutual Support in Games: Some Properties of Berge Equilibria, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2011, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 166–175.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Corly, H.N., Games with Vector Payoffs, J. Optimiz. Theory and Appl., 1985, vol. 47, pp. 491–498.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. Deghdak, M. and Florenzano, M., On the Existence of Berge‘s Strong Equilibrium, International Game Theory Review, 2011, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 325–340.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. Ferro, F., Minimax Theorem for Vector-Valued Functions. Part 2, Dic. Mat. Univ. Genova, 1989, vol. 101, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hurwicz, L., Optimality Criteria for Decision Making under Ignorance, Cowles Commission Discussion Paper, Statistics, 1951, no. 370.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lin, J.G., Maximal Vectors and Multi-Objective Optimization, J. Optimiz. Theory and Appl., 1976, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 41–68.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Li, Z.F. and Wang, S.Y., A Type of Minimax Inequality for Vector-Valued Mappings, J. Math. Anal. and Appl., 1998, vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 68–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  76. Nash, J.F., Non-Cooperative Games, Ann. Math., 1951, vol. 54, pp. 286–295.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Nash, J.F., Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games, Proc. Nat. Academ. Sci. USA, 1950, vol. 36, pp. 48–49.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Von Neumann, J., Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftspiele, Math. Ann., 1928, vol. 100, pp. 295–320.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  79. Pareto, V., Manuel d’économie politique, Paris: Geard, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Savage, L.Y., The Theory of Statistical Decision, J. American Statistic Association, 1951, no. 46, pp. 55–67.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. Vaisman, K.S., The Berge Equilibrium for Linear–Quadratic Differential Game, The 3-rd Intern. Workshop on Multiple Criteria Problems under Uncertainty, Orekhovo-Zuevo, Russia, 1994, p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Vaisman, K.S. and Zhukovskiy, V.I., The Berge Equilibrium under Uncertainty, The 3-rd Intern. Workshop on Multiple Criteria Problems under Uncertainty, Orekhovo-Zuevo, Russia, 1994, pp. 97–98.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wald, A., Contribution to the Theory of Statistical Estimation and Testing Hypothesis, Annuals Math. Statist., 1939, vol. 10, pp. 299–326.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Zhukovskiy, V.I., Some Problems of Non-Antagonistic Differential Games, in Mathematical Methods in Operations Research, Institute of Mathematics with Union of Bulgarian Mathematicians, Rousse, 1985, pp. 103–195.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Salukvadze, M.E., The Vector-Valued Maximin, New York: Academic Press, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhukovskiy, V.I. and Larbani, M., Berge Equilibrium in Normal Form Static Games: A Literature Review, Izv. Inst. Matem. Inform. Udmurt. Gos. Univ., 2017, vol. 49, no. 1 (29), pp. 80–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

E. Salukvadze, M., I. Zhukovskiy, V. (2020). New Approaches to the Solution of Noncooperative Games and Multicriteria Choice Problems. In: The Berge Equilibrium: A Game-Theoretic Framework for the Golden Rule of Ethics. Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25546-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics