Skip to main content

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Indications and Results

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
  • 940 Accesses

Abstract

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is controversial but has nevertheless become standard of care in some centres. The debate is whether the potential benefit for NACT in CRLM is adjuvant or a downsizing effect and consequently how best to measure this: should the endpoint of studies be survival or response and operability? To date a benefit in progression-free survival but not overall survival has been demonstrated in randomised controlled trials. There remain unanswered questions regarding patient selection, scheduling and treatment regimen. There are no accepted predictive biomarkers to guide personalisation of therapy, and patient selection is based upon prognostic rather than predictive criteria. In this chapter we review the evidence for and against NACT, explore the role of biological therapies and provide a summary of current international guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kanas GP, et al. Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors. Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:283–301.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. de Jong MC, et al. Rates and patterns of recurrence following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: an international multi-institutional analysis of 1669 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):440–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sorbye H, et al. Predictive factors for the benefit of perioperative FOLFOX for resectable liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients (EORTC Intergroup Trial 40983). Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):534–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Creasy JM, et al. Actual 10-year survival after hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases: what factors preclude cure? Surgery. 2018;163:1238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. John SK, et al. Prognostic factors and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastasis in the era of preoperative chemotherapy: an 11-year single-centre study. Dig Surg. 2013;30(4–6):293–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sasaki K, et al. Pre-hepatectomy carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels among patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases: do CEA levels still have prognostic implications? HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(12):1000–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Strowitzki MJ, et al. Influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on resection of primary colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116(2):149–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ayez N, et al. The use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases: clinical risk score as possible discriminator. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(7):859–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tol J, Nagtegaal ID, Punt CJ. BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(1):98–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thibodeau SN, Bren G, Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science. 1993;260(5109):816–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sepulveda AR, et al. Molecular biomarkers for the evaluation of colorectal cancer: guideline from the American society for clinical pathology, college of American pathologists, association for molecular pathology, and the American society of clinical oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(13):1453–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Passot G, et al. Prognostic factors after resection of colorectal liver metastases following preoperative second-line chemotherapy: impact of RAS mutations. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(9):1378–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stremitzer S, et al. KRAS status and outcome of liver resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bevacizumab. Br J Surg. 2012;99(11):1575–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tarantino I, et al. Elevated preoperative CEA is associated with worse survival in stage I–III rectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fong Y, et al. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):309–18; discussion 318-21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Konopke R, et al. Prognostic factors and evaluation of a clinical score for predicting survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Liver Int. 2009;29(1):89–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stremitzer S, et al. CEA change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bevacizumab and clinical outcome in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(4):1315–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Adam R, et al. LiverMetSurvey: analysis of clinicopathologic factors associated with the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy in 2,122 patients with colorectal liver metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18_suppl):3521.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Creasy JM, et al. The impact of primary tumor location on long-term survival in patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(2):431–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu D, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nordlinger B, et al. Surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver. A prognostic scoring system to improve case selection, based on 1568 patients. Association Française de Chirurgie. Cancer. 1996;77(7):1254–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagashima I, et al. Proposal of criteria to select candidates with colorectal liver metastases for hepatic resection: comparison of our scoring system to the positive number of risk factors. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(39):6305–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wimmer K, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on clinical risk scores and survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(1):236–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schreckenbach T, et al. The clinical relevance of the Fong and the Nordlinger scores in the era of effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastasis. Surg Today. 2015;45(12):1527–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. D’Alterio C, et al. CXCR4-CXCL12-CXCR7, TLR2-TLR4, and PD-1/PD-L1 in colorectal cancer liver metastases from neoadjuvant-treated patients. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5(12):e1254313.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ribic CM, et al. Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(3):247–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mosakhani N, et al. MicroRNA profiling predicts survival in anti-EGFR treated chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients with wild-type KRAS and BRAF. Cancer Genet. 2012;205(11):545–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pugh S, et al. Association between miR-31-3p expression and cetuximab efficacy in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a post-hoc analysis of the New EPOC trial. Oncotarget. 2017;8(55):93856–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim CY, et al. ERCC1 as a predictive marker for FOLFOX chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting. Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(3):92–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Geva R, et al. The predictive role of ERCC1 status in oxaliplatin based neoadjuvant therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) to the liver. Cancer Investig. 2015;33(4):89–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lorenzon L, et al. Tumor regression grades, K-RAS mutational profile and c-MET in colorectal liver metastases. Pathol Res Pract. 2017;213(8):1002–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fernández-Aceñero MJ, et al. PLK-1 expression is associated with histopathological response to neoadjuvant therapy of hepatic metastasis of colorectal carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2016;22(2):377–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Serrablo A, et al. Impact of novel histopathological factors on the outcomes of liver surgery for colorectal cancer metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(9):1268–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Stift J, et al. Microscopic biliary and perineural invasion and clinical outcome after neoadjuvant bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and liver resection in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(1):139–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nordlinger B, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9617):1007–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nordlinger B, et al. Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(12):1208–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. André T, et al. Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(19):3109–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. André T, et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2343–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Portier G, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid compared with surgery alone after resection of colorectal liver metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):4976–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ychou M, et al. A randomized phase III study comparing adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with FOLFIRI in patients following complete resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(12):1964–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Primrose J, et al. Systemic chemotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis: the New EPOC randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(6):601–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pugh SA, et al. Patterns of progression, treatment of progressive disease and post-progression survival in the New EPOC study. Br J Cancer. 2016;115(4):420–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Jonker DJ, et al. Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2040–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Alberts SR, et al. Effect of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with or without cetuximab on survival among patients with resected stage III colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307(13):1383–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hurwitz H, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2335–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kerr RS, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in patients with colorectal cancer (QUASAR 2): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(11):1543–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wong R, et al. A multicentre study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab as perioperative treatment of patients with poor-risk colorectal liver-only metastases not selected for upfront resection. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(9):2042–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mukai T, et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab for colorectal liver metastasis (N-SOG 05 trial). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017;47(7):597–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cui CH, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) plus targeted agents versus NCT alone in colorectal liver metastases patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2015;6(41):44005–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Kataoka M, et al. The COMET open-label phase II study of neoadjuvant FOLFOX or XELOX treatment combined with molecular targeting monoclonal antibodies in patients with resectable liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(2):546–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bergeat D, et al. Preoperative bevacizumab and surgery for colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score analysis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2017;402(1):57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Cabart M, et al. Bevacizumab efficacy is influenced by primary tumor resection in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in a retrospective multicenter study. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016;15(4):e165–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lim C, et al. Bevacizumab improves survival in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases provided the primary tumor is resected first. Clin Transl Oncol. 2018;20:1274.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Jones RP, et al. PARAGON II – a single arm multicentre phase II study of neoadjuvant therapy using irinotecan bead in patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(12):1866–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ayez N, et al. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone in high-risk patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases: the CHARISMA randomized multicenter clinical trial. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Liu W, et al. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(24):37277–87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Sabanathan D, Eslick GD, Shannon J. Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus molecular targeted therapy in colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016;15(4):e141–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ciliberto D, et al. Role of systemic chemotherapy in the management of resected or resectable colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oncol Rep. 2012;27(6):1849–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang ZM, et al. Peri-operative chemotherapy for patients with resectable colorectal hepatic metastasis: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(9):1197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Araujo RL, Gönen M, Herman P. Chemotherapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases who underwent curative resection improves long-term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(9):3070–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Khoo E, et al. Systematic review of systemic adjuvant, neoadjuvant and perioperative chemotherapy for resectable colorectal-liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(6):485–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Van Cutsem E, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1386–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Naxerova K, et al. Origins of lymphatic and distant metastases in human colorectal cancer. Science. 2017;357(6346):55–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Guinney J, et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2015;21(11):1350–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Bridgewater .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ryan, A., Bridgewater, J. (2020). Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Indications and Results. In: Correia, M., Choti, M., Rocha, F., Wakabayashi, G. (eds) Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25486-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25486-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25485-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25486-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics