Skip to main content

Optimal Controller Parameter Tuning from Multi/Many-objective Optimization Algorithms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Intelligence and Optimization Methods for Control Engineering

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 150))

Abstract

Controller performance is evaluated with the properties of steady-state and transient response of the system at the time domain. The compensators and conventional controllers like PID are designed, so that the desired performance is reached only by adjusting the controller parameters; this adjustment mechanism is called tuning. Even many approaches are proposed for tuning; still, it remains one of the problems of control theory due to the imperfect modeling, disturbance, and problem complexity. At this stage, optimization algorithms have helped the researchers to find these parameters via designing objective function concerning the time response characteristics of the system. As the expectations (for example, steady-state error, overshoot, rise time, settling time) related to the system performance are increased in number, the number of objectives is also increased. As a result, multi-objective optimization algorithms have applied to solve these problems. In this chapter, a set of benchmark tuning problems is defined as the test—benchmark—problems. Then, by using the multi- and many-objective optimization algorithms, the performance of the controlled system with respect to the Pareto approximate set is compared with each other. The multi/many-objective optimization algorithms evaluated in this chapter are as follows: Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOEAD), Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO), Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2), Approximation-guided Evolutionary Algorithm II (AGE-II), and Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm (RVEA).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jagatheesan, K., Anand, B.: Automatic generation control of three area hydro-thermal power systems with electric and mechanic governor. In: Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, pp. 18–20 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laghari, J., Mokhlis, H., Bakar, A.B.H.A., Mohammad, H.: Comparative studies on load frequency control for isolated distribution network connected with mini hydro. In: Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, pp. 211–216 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ziegler, J.G., Nichols, N.B.: Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans. ASME 64, 759–768 (1942)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, G.H., Coon, G.A.: Theoretical consideration of retarded control. Trans. ASME 75, 827–834 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rivera, D.E., Morari, M., Skogestad, S.: Internal model control 4. PID controller design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 25, 252 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ram, P., Jha, A.N.: Automatic generation control of interconnected hydro thermal system in regulated environment considering generation rate constraints. In: International Conference on Industrial electronics, Control and Robotics, pp. 148–159 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khuntia, S.R., Panda, S.: A novel approach for automatic generation control of a multi-area power systems. In: Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, pp. 1182–1187 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, M.K., Naresh, R., Gupta, D.K.: Optimal tuning of temporary droop governor of hydro power plant using genetic algorithm. In: International Conference on Energy Efficient technologies for Sustainability, pp. 1132–1137 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nanda, J., Mishra, S., Mishra, P.G., Sajith, K.V.: A novel classical controller for automatic generation control in thermal and hydrothermal systems. In: International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems, pp. 1–6 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: 1995 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks Proceedings, vols. 1–6, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eberhart, R.C., Shi, Y.H.: Particle swarm optimization: Developments, applications and resources. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vols. 1 and 2, pp. 81–86 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Man, K.F., Tang, K.S., Kwong, S.: Genetic algorithms: concepts and applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 43, 519–534 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Storn, R., Price, K.: Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Glob. Optim. 11, 341–359 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dangor, M., Dahunsi, O.A., Pedro, J.O., Ali, M.M.: Evolutionary algorithm-based PID controller tuning for nonlinear quarter-car electrohydraulic vehicle suspensions. In: Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 78, pp. 2795–2810, Dec 2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-Pour, H., Saryazdi, S.: GSA: a gravitational search algorithm. Inf. Sci. 179, 2232–2248 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tseng, C.-S., Chen, B.-S.: Multiobjective PID control design in uncertain robotic systems using neural network elimination scheme. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Hum. 31(6), 632–644 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Takahashi, R.H.C., Peres, P.L.D., Ferreira, P.A.V.: Multiobjective H2/H1 guaranteed cost PID design. IEEE Control Syst. 17(5), 37–47 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tang, K.S., Man, K.F., Chen, G., Kwong, S.: An optimal fuzzy PID controller. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 48(4), 757–765 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liua, G.P., Daley, S.: Optimal-tuning PID control for industrial systems. Control Eng. Pract. 9(11), 1185–1194 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ayalaa, H.V.H., Coelho, L.S.: Tuning of PID controller based on a multiobjective genetic algorithm applied to a robotic manipulator. Expert Syst. Appl. 49(10), 8968–8974 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Panda, S.: Multi-objective PID controller tuning for a FACTS-based damping stabilizer using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 33(7), 1296–1308 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2 Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm. Technical Report 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Coello Coello, C.A., Lechuga, M.S.: MOPSO: a proposal for multiple objective particle swarm optimization. In: CEC, pp. 1051–1056 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Coello Coello, C.A., Pulido, G.T., Lechuga, M.S.: Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 8(3), 256–279 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodrigez, C.E.R., Bideaux, C., Guillouet, S.E., Gorret, N., Roux, G., Jouve, C.M., Lara, C.A.A.: Multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) of lipid accumulation in Fed-batch cultures. In: 24th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, pp. 979–984 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(6), 712–731 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wagner, M., Neumann, F.: A fast approximation-guided evolutionary multi-objective algorithm. In: Evolutionary Computation Group Technical Document, pp. 1–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng, R., Jin, Y., Olhofer, M., Sendhof, B.: A reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 20(5), 773–791 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schott, J.R.: Fault tolerant design using single and multicriteria genetic algorithm optimization. M.S. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Tolga Altinoz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Altinoz, O.T. (2019). Optimal Controller Parameter Tuning from Multi/Many-objective Optimization Algorithms. In: Blondin, M., Pardalos, P., Sanchis Sáez, J. (eds) Computational Intelligence and Optimization Methods for Control Engineering. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 150. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25446-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics