Skip to main content

Behavioral Operations and Behavioral Operational Research: Similarities and Differences in Competences and Capabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Behavioral Operational Research

Abstract

Gino and Pisano (2008) suggest “behavioural operations is the study of attributes of human behaviour and cognition that impact the design, management, and improvement of operating systems, and the study of the interaction between such attributes and operating systems and processes.” On the other hand, “Behavioural operational research is defined as the study of behavioural aspects related to the use of operational research methods in modelling, problem solving and decision support” (Hämäläinen et al. 2013). These two emergent streams in their respective fields have many aspects in common but they also focus on different issues using dissimilar approaches. This chapter evaluates practices, bodies of knowledge, and methodological approaches in behavioral operations to extract a set of lessons that can be incorporated to behavioral operational research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arango-Aramburo, S., van Ackere, A., & Larsen, E. R. (2016). Simulation and laboratory experiments: Exploring self-organizing behavior in a collective choice model. In M. Kunc, J. Malpass, & L. White (Eds.), Behavioral Operational Research: Theory, Methodology and Practice (pp. 87–104). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bendoly, E., Croson, R., Goncalves, P., & Schultz, K. (2010). Bodies of knowledge for research in behavioral operations. Production and Operations Management, 19(4), 434–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendoly, E., Donohue, K., & Schultz, K. (2006). Behavioral operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 737–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendoly, E., & Schultz, K. (Eds.). (2006). Incorporating behavioral theory in OM empirical models. Journal of Operations Management, 24(6), 735–863 (Special issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., Schultz, K., Siemsen, E., & Yeo, M. L. (2013). Behavioral operations: The state of the field. Journal of Operations Management, 31(1–2), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, L. A., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (2016). Engaging with behavioral operational research: On methods, actors and praxis. In M. Kunc, J. Malpass, & L. White (Eds.), Behavioral Operational Research: Theory, Methodology and Practice (pp. 3–25). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gary, M. S., Kunc, M., Morecroft, J. D., & Rockart, S. F. (2008). System dynamics and strategy. System Dynamics Review, 24(4), 407–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Pisano, G. (2008). Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(4), 676–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greasley, A., & Owen, C. (2016). Behavior in models: A framework for representing human behavior. In M. Kunc, J. Malpass, & L. White (Eds.), Behavioral Operational Research: Theory, Methodology and Practice (pp. 47–63). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, R. P., Luoma, J., & Saarinen, E. (2013). On the importance of behavioral operational research: The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(3), 623–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huh, K. K., & Kunc, M. (2016). Supporting strategy: Behavioral influences on resource conceptualization processes. In M. Kunc, J. Malpass, & L. White (Eds.), Behavioral Operational Research: Theory, Methodology and Practice (pp. 337–356). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Katok, E. (2011). Using laboratory experiments to build better operations management models. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information, and Operations Management, 5(1), 1–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2016). Behavior with models: The role of psychological heuristics in operational research. In M. Kunc, J. Malpass, & L. White (Eds.), Behavioral Operational Research: Theory, Methodology and Practice (pp. 27–46). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Katsikopoulos, K. V., & Gigerenzer, G. (2013). Behavioral operations management: A blind spot and a research program. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazakov, R., & Kunc, M. (2016). Foreseeing the dynamics of strategy: An anticipatory systems perspective. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 29(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunc, M. (2016). System dynamics: A behavioral modeling method. In Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 53–64). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunc, M., Harper, P. R., & Katsikopoulos, K. (2018). A review of implementation of behavioural aspects in the application of OR in healthcare. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1489355.

  • Kunc, M., Malpass, J., & White, L. (Eds.). (2016). Behavioral Operational Research: Theory, Methodology and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loch, C., & Wu, Y. (2007). Behavioral operations management. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information, and Operations Management, 1(3), 121–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, B. B., Hill, A. V., & Donohue, K. L. (2013). Individual differences in the newsvendor problem: Behavior and cognitive reflection. Journal of Operations Management, 31(1–2), 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, J. P., Kunc, M., & O’Brien, F. (2017). Supporting strategy using system dynamics. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(3), 1081–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (2016). Behavior beyond the model. In M. Kunc, J. Malpass, & L. White (Eds.), Behavioral Operational Research: Theory, Methodology and Practice (pp. 68–84). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kunc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kunc, M. (2020). Behavioral Operations and Behavioral Operational Research: Similarities and Differences in Competences and Capabilities. In: White, L., Kunc, M., Burger, K., Malpass, J. (eds) Behavioral Operational Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25405-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics